dark light

mirza2003

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 116 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2024546
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Mirza2003, Everything is related actually. Though I agree with you that this is Indian Navy News and Discussion, but why so abusive?

    sorry about outburst, but it is very easy now day to blame center for everything,did I chosed them alone no everybody is part of center.

    I am Sikh, I can say center is supporting south,all eggs in one basket of south why no research center in Punjab why no new ofb factory in punjab how many heavy industry center start in north,list is nowhere near end Evan every war north bear the burnt

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2024578
    mirza2003
    Participant

    ahh south cry foul north cry foul east cry foul west cry foul,because it is political problem not people’s, just bomb the whole lot, simple that way everything solve.

    shut up the hell up! Please. do your what you come here to do this not political thread and stop blaming own people blame politics choose wisely.

    in reply to: Quadbike Indian Air Force Thread Part 18 #2294552
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Nothing new from China.

    😮

    +1
    typical copy cat

    in reply to: Quadbike Indian Air Force Thread Part 18 #2294739
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Funny … from Chinese links we get clearer images of Indian aircraft than from Indian blogs ! :diablo:

    Lifted from shiv aroor’s blog livefist
    http://livefist.blogspot.in/

    in reply to: Indian Su-30 – not completely reliable? #2295220
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Trident

    You have hit the nail on the head.

    There are aerospace journos, and there are aerospace journos.
    Richard Aboulafia on Russian Military equipment and Asian airforces dont “mix very well”. There are a multitude of chaps on this forúm who are vastly more reliable than Aboulafia on these particular matters.

    Aboulafia has India phobia in actual.
    Sometime back he did not like Indian airport./
    I had one word F*&^ Aboulafia:dev2:

    in reply to: Quadbike Indian Air Force Thread Part 18 #2339286
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Because single engine aircraft are barred from taking part in fly-past & display because of an earlier accident involving Mirage-2000 during Republic Day. The brave pilot died in crash.

    http://www.warbirds.in/Crashes/Photos/1989-10-08Bakshi.jpg
    Wg Cdr Ramesh Bakshi

    http://www.warbirds.in/Crashes/Images/19891008Mir.jpg
    Spectators view as Mirage 2000 KF-102 explodes after hitting the ground. Wg Cdr Ramesh Bakshi , CO 7 Sqn was killed in the incident. Pic Copyright Arun Sharma

    http://www.warbirds.in/Crashes/crdetails.php?crno=224

    please go through the LINK page
    accident happen on 8oct an airforce day at palam airport IMHO
    slip of tongue or. :O
    No aircraft ever crash during republic day parade

    in reply to: Quadbike Indian Air Force Thread Part 18 #2356853
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Great pics dude, i just wish you had a bigger Tele lens.:)

    I just start this as hobby and using Nikon s6000 Basic Digital camera.
    my target is big DSLR camera with good lens but for now…

    in reply to: Quadbike Indian Air Force Thread Part 18 #2356864
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Hey guy check out today’s flypast of 26 Jan. Republic day parade.
    Pics taken by me

    http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/710/dscn1914j.jpg
    http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/4636/dscn1892v.jpg
    http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/5265/dscn1899g.jpg
    http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/2430/dscn1903u.jpg
    http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/1024/dscn1905w.jpg
    http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/2003/dscn1908bl.jpg
    http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/1558/dscn1909v.jpg
    http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/2146/dscn1910z.jpg

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2384856
    mirza2003
    Participant

    I was interested too but couldn’t find any credible source for this engagement apart from some random blogs.

    Most likely it’s one of the legends born out of fog of war.

    On the contrary the only news source I found was about PAF engaging IAF, as below.

    I appreciate that there won’t be an independent source to confirm this, but has anyone seen any official/credible source from Indian side? Anything in the press etc?

    PAF engages Indian Air Force

    9th July, 1999, APP, Dawn/PNS

    ISLAMABAD: In what was a classic pre-dawn interception, air defence interceptors of the Pakistan Air Force, comprising of two PAF F-7MP fighter jets, intercepted and engaged intruding Indian Air Force (IAF) fighter jets which crossed the Line of Control in Jammu & Kashmir and violated Pakistan’s airspace by several kilometres. The IAF fighters were believed to be two MiG-27ML ground-attack aircraft and two Mirage 2000H fighters providng top cover. The event took place in the early hours of Thursday, 8 July 1999, at approximately 2:30 a.m. (0230 hours) PST.

    According to sources, PAF F-7MP fighters were supported by two F-16 Fighting Falcons providing back-up which conducted electronic jamming of the intruder IAF ‘bandits’. The F-16s were scrambled whereas the F-7MPs were already on Combat Air Patrol (CAP) duty when the incursion occured.

    The PAF F-7MP air defence interceptors were immediately vectored by GCI towards the intruding ‘bandits’ within seconds of their crossing into Pakistan airspace. The PAF fighters intercepted the Indian fighters and ‘locked’ on them with their missiles. In fighter terms, this is an invitation for a dogfight. However, the IAF fighters refused to engage in return and instead fled straight back into the airspace of Indian-held Kashmir in what PAF pilots perceived was sheer panic. “It was not a very orderly or dignified exit”, remarked a PAF officer.

    According to PAF sources, even the Dynamic Launch Zone (DLZ) perimetres had been met for launching of the air-to-air missiles which means that the PAF pilots had gotten the AAM tone indicating the bandits were well within shoot-down range of the PAF fighters. A missile tone is achieved when the missile’s infrared heat-seeker or its radar has picked up the hostile aircraft. “It looks as if we gave them a fright”, says a PAF officer, “Their RWR signal would have been blasting off in the cockpits as our interceptors tracked them”. If the missiles were short-range heat-seeking missiles, then this would imply that the distance between the PAF and the IAF fighters was less than 10 kilometres – “Too close for comfort”, as the PAF officer remarked.

    PAF fighters did not shoot down the Indian fighters even though they were within range of the air-to-air missiles of the PAF fighters. The Indian fighters were perilously close to the Line of Control and their wreckage may have fallen inside Indian-held Kashmir territory which, going by their track record, would have given the Indian authorities the opportunity to blame the PAF for the intrusion.

    According to the PAF Rules of Engagement (ROE), three conditions have to be met in peacetime before an enemy aircraft can be shot down: (i) the enemy aircraft must violate Pakistan’s airspace; (ii) it must be a combat aircraft and (iii) its wreckage must fall inside Pakistani territory. ‘Peacetime’ in the context of India and Pakistan means when no war has been declared.

    In this instance, the third criterion may not have been met as the IAF fighters were too close to the LoC and their wreckage may have fallen on either side of the LoC.

    “All the intruder Indian fighters fled when our air defence fighters locked on them”, said a PAF officer.

    A second intrusion occured seven and a half hours later, at approximately 10:00 a.m. (1000 hours) PST, when two IAF fighter jets violated Pakistan’s airspace in the Mushkoh-Olding sector in Jammu & Kashmir. Two F-7MPs were immediately scrambled from a forward PAF air base to intercept the two intruders. However, the IAF jets sensing the PAF fighters fast approaching them, turned back and fled into Indian-held Kashmir before the PAF interceptors could get a missile lock-on them.

    In both cases, the IAF intruders had taken off from Srinagar air base, according to PAF GCI controllers.

    It is pertinent to mention here that earlier this year, on 27 May 1999, two intruder Indian Air Force MiGs – a MiG-27ML and a MiG-21bis – were shot down by the Pakistan Army using Anza-II SAMs after the IAF jets had violated Pakistan’s airspace in the Jammu & Kashmir region. The wreckage of both the Indian aircraft fell 10-12 kilometres inside Pakistani territory near Hamzi Ghund. One Indian pilot, Flt. Lt. K. Nachiketa, was captured whereas the other pilot, Sqn. Ldr. Ajay Ahuja, was killed. Sqn. Ldr. Ahuja’s body was returned to India with full military honours and Flt. Lt. Nachiketa was released shortly afterwards.

    Typical Pakistan style.

    we let Pakistan go very lightly:mad: than must be punished than or now

    in reply to: attack helicopters compared #2324893
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Reading this topic I tried to make a complete list of all attack helicopters including some recent prototypes:

    AW129 family
    Tiger family
    AH-1 family
    AH-64 family
    Mi-24/35/Superhind
    Mi-28
    Rooivalk
    Ka-50/52
    LCH
    WZ-10

    Some armed observation helicopters which have the looks of an attack helo:

    Shahed 285 (status unknown)
    OH-1
    Ansat 2RC (status unknown)

    The list of armed transports is much larger, so only a few:

    AH-60L Arpia
    MD-500/530
    OH-58D
    MI-8/17/171 Hip-E
    KA-29
    Socat
    Panther
    Bo-105
    Gazelle
    W-3
    Lynx

    The list of armed transports
    Dhruv WSI

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2321066
    mirza2003
    Participant

    256nautical miles is maximum range IMHO.

    Because as per PDF file there is * given which tell it it depend on unit configuration.

    So Anrudha can do the same thing in (if) upgraded up to best configuration

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2351946
    mirza2003
    Participant

    because those 3 are improvements of aircraft conceived in the 1970s :diablo:
    the two winners are aircraft conceived in the 1980s to counter those aircraft in the 1970s.

    if it makes you feel better, it simply means that IAF chose the less obsolete aircraft.

    Flaming

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2356461
    mirza2003
    Participant
    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2316427
    mirza2003
    Participant

    WOW wow!!

    Libya is now a live ground testing facility for new weapons :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2335725
    mirza2003
    Participant

    Best thing to do would be to get the top down view of the aircraft understand what shadow it forms

    You just dropped a request!

    soon your wish fulfill by someone who daily posting(planting) new pics.for us as fodder.

    but real test lies in capabilities of this model(yes it is until it flies).

    Is china can really stuff the ability of true 5th generation :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 116 total)