dark light

Showtime 100

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 819 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: JF-17 v. Mirage 2000 #2516480
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    That is exactly my point… ๐Ÿ˜€

    What point?

    in reply to: JF-17 v. Mirage 2000 #2516488
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Well…considering that it is the principal BVRAAM of the worlds best airforce and also many others and the latest version having 50% more range…i would think Aim120 is really good…dont you?

    About the Blk52 F16…the APG68 radar is a good thing to have.What radar did they put on the JF17?

    A Chinese made radar! ๐Ÿ˜€

    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Which means we’ll actually see it in 2015 or so. Look how long it took for the first J-10 images to surface.

    J-10 takes many yrs to develop means China next generation will also be equally longtime to develop…???

    PRC 10yrs ago is not even 10th largest economy,so 10yrs later it shall also be in the same position? Who is the 4th largest economy now?

    Do u know what is called ” Progress” ?

    in reply to: JF-17 v. Mirage 2000 #2516529
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Nope i didnt forget…whats so special about SD10?Also consider radar,ECM etc. when you compare those planes.

    What so special abt F-16C/D Block 52 fitted with ABVRAAM?

    Showtime 100
    Participant

    IMO, the most straightforward and reliable way to track Chinese J-XXโ€™s progress is to track the development of Chinese turbofan engines designed to power the fighter.

    Because AVICIโ€™s open source has already declared they wonโ€™t compromise their next generation fighter or J-xx by using any legacy 3rd gen powerplant but 4th gen engine like WS-15. And I believe the development of such a powerplant is the hardest part for AVICI to conquer.

    Remember the J-11B prototype is also served as high altitude testbed for WS-10A turbofan? My guess is this time around, AVICI will play the same by utilizing the twin engine powered J-XX prototype as the high altitude testbed for WS-15.

    With the confirmed designation of WS-15, AVICI has probably finalized the design of the T/W 10 grade core engine and moved into next stage of model development. If so, the rules of 5 years model, 5 years certification applies, then the WS-15 could be certificated in 2015 or 2016 if everything goes smoothly. Of course high altitude test should be carried out well before the WS-15 certification, which means the J-XX 4th fighter prototype could probably take the maiden flight before 2015!

    I predict by 2010,we will see it 1st prototype of J-XX flying… ๐Ÿ˜€

    In fact,WS-15 development already started last year.

    in reply to: JF-17 v. Mirage 2000 #2516536
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Btw…Can the JF17 even compete with a Block 52 F16 with Amraam?

    U forget JF-17 can fire SD-10 ABVRAAM…

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2517573
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    From IDEAS 2006 – Pakistan:

    JF-17 Retractable In flight refueling probe:

    ??? How come never show in Zuhai but show in IDEAS 2006? Btw,I seems to sense that Chinese side has tone down on the promotion of FC-1…
    Engines will be the most problematic for JF-17.

    Showtime 100
    Participant

    To be exact, the news is appeared on 13 Sept, 2005 ( 1.htm)

    http://www.hyfcc.com/xinwen/gongzuo/25/

    But donโ€™t know how, the news only released to the public recently, maybe the domain only be accessible to public recently.

    No matter how the article does confirm the โ€œNew type of Turbofan engineโ€ (WS-15 ) will power future Chinese 4th Generation fighter jet ( Western standard).

    Any speculation on the expected thrust of WS-15? I believe will be at least more than 1,5000kg of thrust! ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2520144
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    i see what you mean. used Tu-22m3 is not only good option but only option. i think it is good enough to defend Nansha from Vietnamese and Philipinio

    Why do PRC need to defend from Vietnam and Philippines? I bet there wouldn’t even dare to get near PLAN..

    in reply to: Mi-17 firing Noor (C-802) missile #1805773
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    I’m surprised Iran never buy PRC JH-7A strike aircraft to increase their strike capabilites since they got plenty of c-802. Btw,anybody know their F-4 and Su-24 capable of operating the C-802?

    in reply to: China sub secretly stalked U.S. fleet #2078679
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    this release of info was meant to undermine the above visit of the commander of us navy’s pacific fleet to china by some who want a more aggressive posture against china.

    How aggresssive they want? Another 1921 Washington treaty? ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: China sub secretly stalked U.S. fleet #2078719
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    The Chinese sub purposely surface within 5 miles of the carrier fleet! More or less it is trying to prove a point to US fleet.

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2524880
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    I couldn’t get that link to work – can you tell me what scale that model is / manufacturer etc??

    Judge yrself!

    in reply to: China is buliding its Beidou Navigation Satellite System #2524898
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Translate from the Chinese character! “Beidou code one system”

    Pic of PLA troops using Beidou GPS system!

    Showtime 100
    Participant

    This really creases me up man ๐Ÿ˜€

    Time to run for the hills me thinks ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    Man.. they are using M-16. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 819 total)