dark light

Showtime 100

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 819 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Status LCA #2671969
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Nice aircfraft,share a lot of similarities with Mirage 2000!

    in reply to: Fc-1 has US technology – a claim #2672700
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    I thought that the FC-1 was Chinese tech? 🙂

    We recently heard news reports talking about a Chinese radar being fitted to the fc-1, a smaller version of the j-10 radar has been mentioned. One wonders why an aircraft that a few months ago, was taunted as having such a big nose, would not get the same j-10 sized radar? Am I the only one who finds this confusing, why would u want to get a less capable radar if you can fit the original and more capable radar in the nose?

    China is wayy off the plasma stealth field.

    FC-1 is meant to be a budget fighter plane! Adding this bigger or better radar will raise the cost!

    in reply to: Russian military discontent with the Ka-50? #2672815
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    I think the Ka-50 lost a lot of points with the military after the crash which killed general Vorobyov. Just like the other crash of this type, the helo went down because the counter-rotating rotor blades actually hit each other thanks to negative G maneuvring.

    Doesn’t Ka-50 has ejection seat to save life? Or the general forget to put the plug?

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part 3 #2673652
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    The Q-5 is popular with the PLAAF. It is cheap, fast and dead reliable, the latter you can’t say much with regards to the Su-27s. For CAS, it would be a waste to use expensive jets like J-11 or even J-10s. Currently the PLAAF has no nothing or no successor to fill in the CAS role other than the Q-5. Fitted with modern avionics like laser target designators, the Fantan is getting a lease of new life.

    It’s limited payload and range will make it hard for further future upgraded.

    Maybe they make thing like FC-1 with less air performance but with increase payload.(FC-1 carry a pricetag of 15million-cheap)

    in reply to: Rumor Mill of The Day: JH-7 for Argintina??? #2673859
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Argentina has recovered some of its economic thanks to the strong buying of argentina arigculture product from PRC even before the billion dollar investment!

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part 3 #2674184
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    It looks a bit like an attempt to recycle the Q-5.

    A two seater version of Q-5! PLAF still wants to cling on hope on Q-5?

    in reply to: New speed record from X-43A: M9,8 #2675959
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    NASA’S X-43A Scramjet Breaks Speed Record
    November 16, 2004

    Release: 04-59

    Printer Friendly Version

    NASA’s X-43A research vehicle screamed into the record books again Tuesday, demonstrating an air-breathing engine can fly at nearly 10 times the speed of sound. Preliminary data from the scramjet-powered research vehicle show its revolutionary engine worked successfully at nearly Mach 9.8, or 7,000 mph, as it flew at about 110,000 feet.

    The high-risk, high-payoff flight, originally scheduled for Nov. 15, took place in restricted airspace over the Pacific Ocean northwest of Los Angeles. The flight was the last and fastest of three unpiloted flight tests in NASA’s Hyper-X Program. The program’s purpose is to explore an alternative to rocket power for space access vehicles.

    “This flight is a key milestone and a major step toward the future possibilities for producing boosters for sending large and critical payloads into space in a reliable, safe, inexpensive manner,” said NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe. “These developments will also help us advance the Vision for Space Exploration, while helping to advance commercial aviation technology,” Administrator O’Keefe said.

    Supersonic combustion ramjets (scramjets) promise more airplane-like operations for increased affordability, flexibility and safety in ultra high-speed flights within the atmosphere and for the first stage to Earth orbit. The scramjet advantage is once it is accelerated to about Mach 4 by a conventional jet engine or booster rocket, it can fly at hypersonic speeds, possibly as fast as Mach 15, without carrying heavy oxygen tanks, as rockets must.

    The design of the engine, which has no moving parts, compresses the air passing through it, so combustion can occur. Another advantage is scramjets can be throttled back and flown more like an airplane, unlike rockets, which tend to produce full thrust all the time.

    “The work of the Langley-Dryden team and our Vehicle Systems Program has been exceptional,” said NASA’s Associate Administrator for Aeronautics Research J. Victor Lebacqz. “This shows how much we can accomplish when we manage the risk and work together toward a common goal. NASA has made a tremendous contribution to the body of knowledge in aeronautics with the Hyper-X program, as well as making history.”

    The flight was postponed by one day when repair of an instrumentation problem with the X-43A caused a delay. When the preflight checklist was resumed, not enough time remained to meet the FAA launch deadline of 7 p.m. EST.

    Today, the X-43A, attached to its modified Pegasus rocket booster, took off from Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., tucked under the wing of the B-52B launch aircraft. The booster and X-43A were released from the B-52B at 40,000 feet and the booster’s engine ignited, taking the X-43A to its intended altitude and speed. The X-43A then separated from the booster and accelerated on scramjet power to a brief flight at nearly Mach 10.

    NASA’s Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va., and Dryden jointly conduct the Hyper-X Program. NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, Washington, manages it. ATK-GASL (formerly Microcraft, Inc.) at Tullahoma, Tenn., and Ronkonkoma, N.Y., built the X-43A aircraft and the scramjet engine, and Boeing Phantom Works, Huntington Beach, Calif., designed the thermal protection and onboard systems. The booster is a modified first stage of a Pegasus rocket built by Orbital Sciences Corp, Chandler, Ariz.

    For more information about the Hyper-X program and the flights of the X-43A, visit:

    http://www.nasa.gov/missions/research/x43-main.html

    For information about NASA and agency programs on the Web, visit:

    http://www.nasa.gov

    I heard the US wanted this technology to be utilised on their cruise missiles and warplane! Which means next time we will see a 10 mach tomahawk missiles flying around and there is no way u can intercept that!

    in reply to: Slightly OT – My model Il-38 #2677522
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    A bit of panel highlighting and weathering will make it fantastic!

    in reply to: French Shoot Down Ivory Coast Warplanes #2681091
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    The ivory coast r stupid enough to take on the french! The french r so convince of the terrible state of ivory coast airforce that they send only Mirage F-1 to support! One of the french least capable french warplane.

    in reply to: French Shoot Down Ivory Coast Warplanes #2682129
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Not always the easiest thing in the World to do, but I have been trying to keep tabs on what hardware has been finishing-up in Africa over the past few years.

    I had a quick look back through some stuff from earlier this year, and the Ivory Coast should have received the following fairly recently:

    2 x Su-25UB in 2003 from Belarus

    2 x MiG-23 in 2003 from Bulgaria

    2 x Mi-24 in 2003 from Bulgaria

    2 x Mi-24V in 2002 from Belarus

    2 x IAR 330 Pumas (VIP-configured & delivered aboard An-22 from Bucharest May 16th, 2003)

    2 x IAR 330 Pumas (SAR/multi-role configured)

    If anyone knows of anything else that’s headed in that direction, please let us know!

    Best regards

    Steve Rush ~ Touchdown-News

    They seems like to buy 2 for every single model.

    in reply to: French Shoot Down Ivory Coast Warplanes #2616248
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Then we will have a chance to see a dogfight of Mig-23 vs Mirage F-1 or Rafale! Provided Ivory coast can manage to get them on air.

    in reply to: Hamina Class #2067493
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    No sam fited,too small for any addtional equipment.Maybe portable stinger missiles?

    in reply to: Russian BB's of WWII #2067551
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Russian Battleships of WWII:
    They are all of WWI vintage Gangut class BBs.
    Oktyabrskaya Revolyutsiya (Gangut as built)
    Marat (Petropavlovsk as built)- this is the one Rudel badly damaged.
    Parizhskaya Komuna (Sevastopol as built)
    There is also the last one of the class, Frunze (Poltava as built), but it was comprehensively damaged in 1926 and was not repaired.
    HMS Royal Sovereign was also lent to the soviets in 1944 and renamed as Archangels.

    So basically Russian navy has no battleship in WWII.Even has,I think will be sunk by Nazi.

    in reply to: Interesting pic, what's the story? #2616835
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Maybe a rich man has make a scale 1:1 Mirage lll model and intended to transport to some destination for display!

    in reply to: New Chinese fighter planned #2616837
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Maybe they r trying to learn from US.US too got plenty of military aviation company producing plenty of variety of aircraft!

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 819 total)