dark light

Showtime 100

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 819 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan Air Force II #2425439
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    I have raised the issue of your abuse with the moderator and they will look into that. you may edit it but it’ll show in my quotes.

    as for the JF-17 being capable of 8.5G, its not- check these pics from IDEAS 2008. the placards were placed in front of the JF-17 and were prepared by none other than PAC Kamra. I’m sure they know better than some internet fanboy like you.

    there you go. the pictures don’t lie. either PAC Kamra is lying or you are. :rolleyes: I don’t for a minute have any doubts as to who is.

    and by bringing in the Tejas into this thread with your deliberate flaming, you’re inviting us to discuss that in detail. will bring much grief to Pakistani posters who want only PAF to be discussed here.

    http://www.pac.org.pk/amfsite-final/jf17.html

    Performance: max level speed ‘clean’ at altitude Mach 1.6 or 1,909 km/h (1,186 mph); service ceiling 15,240 m (50,000 ft); ferry range 2,037 km (1,266 miles); operational radius 1,352 km (840 miles); G-limit: +8.5

    I link to directly the website and I don’t just show pictures. :rolleyes:

    That picture u show is manipulated… Such trick to use.. shame on you! :diablo:

    I think I need to start showing youtube video of plane pulling tight turn and not just talk on paper and talk only.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force II #2425462
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Stop the talk and let us just wait for JF-17 induction soon and start pulling 8.5G

    I know some aircraft will break now for doing that part. :diablo:

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2425470
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    “Forget all that stuff about thrust and drag, lift and
    gravity; an airplane flies because of money.”
    – Anonymous

    Precisely, this is what Russian are lacking… They are hit badly by the financial crisis.

    Even u got the greatest talent and designer but when u lack money for their research, it’s useless..

    Look at their latest ICBM, so many test failure. U know why? They lack fund for more testing and haste into final stage test..

    Most of their stuff are just hot air! :diablo:

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2425804
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    My intention is not to argue WS-10 is to” give similar if not better performance the latest Russian engines” or not. Because, your real intention here is not that mocked one either.

    By keep mentioning WS-10 just developed to a level of design by US or Russia achieved in 1970s or 80s, every body here can see you actually are selling the WS-10 is out of date like what Type 59 being misled by your way of laying words.

    But a reality check finding you agree that even the latest model of F110’s TWR can not be better than 8, which essentially put the majority of big thrust fighter turbofan engine now available in the market in a class of technology level of 1980s, see your own difination of technology level just several posts ago:

    Of course that 1980s impression is just associated with WS-10. Once it comes to F110, even under manufactured today, the story is somehow different now, now your answer is a big YES, to the question whether an F110 is a up to date advanced engine or not, although the F110/F100 by your own words : “… will not pass the 8:1 thrust-weight-ratio related to their core-technology”, so where’s your 1980s technology now?

    Ws-10 even developed much later, still relevant to the 21st century reality of world today. How many F135/F119 are deployed? How many 117S’ are deployed as well? As maya mentioned, if you want to compare that frontline, China is in the intensive stage to develop Ws-15 TWR 10 engine with brand new core to address the new challenge. The 1st prototype of WS-15 probably is out for test in near future. When the majority of big thrust fighter engines like F110/F100/AL31 is dominated by 1970-80s technology core limits, even today, what’s wrong only you want to single out Ws-10 to label 1970/80S?

    Hahaha.. Sens, eat your own words! :diablo:

    Pinko has explain it nicely.

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2426200
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Lavi? The Israel properly even need to beg China to help them complete Lavi. 😉

    Lavi is just another smaller(less payload,less range, less thrust) inferior similiar type version of J-10.

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2412469
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Hmm, that ‘s almost $110mil per aircraft. Quite a lot for something Chinese, I’d bet on some military cargo transport?

    I seriously doubt any Chinese military cargo transport a piece will cost that much…

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2434095
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    NO BVR ? Do you know what radar/missile combos are selected. There was some report that MICA is being considered.

    First 50 batch are definitely KLJ-7 Chinese radar as stated in previous report.

    BVRAAM is definitely SD-10 or PL-11. No way Chinese will release the radar source code of the radar to be integrated with other foreign missile.

    So the No 111 which is shown here shall have the KLJ-7 intergrated inside.

    MICA is considered for the next batch after the 50s. So far, no concrete news for the radar. All is speculating at the moment.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2434131
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    No IFR, and most important no BVR…

    (Someone should tell the mr Gilani that his suit is a bit oversized.)

    Why so impatient? It just a matter of very short time to have these babies. 😉

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2434147
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    It’s a feat! 😎

    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Difference is radar/avionics/ecm and weapons. Pakistan is not buying ready to fly fighterjets but empty and still a lot to develop J10’s…

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=1491655&postcount=354

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2434248
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Originally Posted by Aviation Week

    Avic Open To Local Manufacturing Of L-15s

    Nov 19, 2009

    By Bradley Perrett

    Avic Defense, adopting an increasingly Western approach to military aircraft sales, says it is willing to allow foreign production of its latest export product, the L-15 Falcon supersonic trainer.

    The aircraft is likely to retain the key advantage of an aircraft from a developing country, however, since the manufacturer is also suggesting it will be cheaply priced.

    The L-15 is joining a crowded market as one of four trainers with the high flight performance needed for direct pilot transition to the most advanced fighters. Other players in the field are the Korea Aerospace T-50, Yakovlev Yak-130 and Alenia M-346.

    The M-346 is a derivative of the Yak-130, while the L-15 resembles the Russian aircraft and was developed with help from Yakovlev.

    Avic Defense’s trainer business, Hongdu Aviation of Nanchang, has already had considerable success in allowing a customer to set up a separate production line. Its JL-8 (or K-8) subsonic jet trainer has been assembled in Egypt as part of an order for 120.

    But the willingness of Avic Defense to allow foreign assembly of the L-15 is more surprising, since the company has not yet put the Falcon into large-scale production at home. Moreover, manufacturers in up-and-coming aircraft industries, far more than most Western competitors, are usually highly protective of their home production lines.

    “Because the L-15 has been developed and made in China, we are very competitive in price,” says Avic Defense President Wang Yawei, also asserting that the aircraft’s performance is at least comparable with that of its competitors.

    Five L-15s have been built so far, Wang told Aviation Week during an interview in the company’s offices in central Beijing. One of the five is slated to be at the Dubai Airshow to perform the type’s first foreign flight demonstration. Despite skepticism in some aerospace companies about the value of air-show flight displays, Avic Defense feels they can bring great success after its experience with the Egyptian order.

    Export sales may be particularly crucial for the L-15, since it is not assured of large-scale domestic sales. The Chinese air force could instead buy the JL-9, a massively modified derivative of the MiG-21, as its supersonic trainer.

    The JL-9, also called the FTC-2000, is a product of the Guizhou Aircraft subsidiary of Avic General Aircraft.

    Aerodynamically, the L-15 features prominent leading-edge extensions that help it to emulate the extreme maneuverability of the latest fighters. The flight control system is digitally commanded.

    As to the similarity to the Yak-130, “the development of the L-15 was primarily based on the results of domestic technology research,” says Wang.

    “[But] in seeking to catch up with the mainstream development of such advanced trainers, we proceeded with international cooperation in certain areas, benefiting from our long-term relationships. We cooperated with international partners on aerodynamic design and testing.”

    In the development of the latest-generation trainers, such cooperation has inevitably resulted in an interchange of ideas and the partners learning from each other, says Wang. “So the similar characteristics of these similar products simply reflect technological cooperation and the requirements of the market.”

    Avic Defense specializes in fighters, trainers, drones and missiles, although it also has considerable nonmilitary and even nonaeronautic activities. Its key factories are the combat aircraft plants at Chengdu and Shenyang, Hongdu Aircraft, the missile facilities at Luoyang and three maintenance businesses.

    The J-10 is the latest fighter from Chengdu to enter service, although a successor is close to flight testing (see p. 26).

    Despite reports of an imminent sale to Pakistan, Wang plays down the immediate potential of the J-10 (or Jian-10) as an export product, because Avic Defense is too busy filling domestic orders.

    “The J-10 is one of the major fighter aircraft for the Chinese air force,” he stresses. “The main responsibility of our facilities is to operate at full load to provide this advanced military aviation equipment to the Chinese air force. Whether the J-10 will be offered in the international market will be decided in the future.”

    China has agreed to sell 36 J-10s to Pakistan, the Financial Times and Pakistan’s Daily Times quote unnamed Pakistani officials as saying. Wang told Aviation Week he has not heard of such reports.

    For the moment, the company is promoting export sales of its FC-1 Xiaolong (or JF-17 Thunder), which it says is of the same technology generation as the J-10. The FC-1 has been jointly developed with Pakistan.

    Separately, details of Shenyang’s F-8T, the latest version of another Avic Defense product, have been revealed. The fighter, whose origins date back to the 1960s, now offers 15,400 lb. thrust, up 4% from the previously reported rating, and a multifunction X band pulse-Doppler radar with a detection range of 75 km. (40 nm.) for 3-sq.-meter targets.

    A brochure shows the aircraft with Avic Defense’s advanced PL-12 air-to-air missile. Weight is 10.4 metric tons empty, 15.2 tons at normal takeoff and 20 tons maximum.

    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/AVIC111909.xml&headline=Avic%20Open%20To%20Local%20Manufacturing%20Of%20L-15s

    Most likely J-10 to Pakistan will not materialise so soon. May take another 5 years to agreement, signing of paper or will never even happen. PAF short of cash is a major problem.

    in reply to: Chinese New Generation Fighter will fly soon….. #2434293
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Igor Grigoriyev, Commercial Director, NPO Saturn, interviewed Dec.’08
    c/o Igor’s blogspot:

    There is no prove again regarding the copy of engine. FWS-10 is clearly different from AL-31 engine as proven in previous post. So I do not understand what is term of copy. If it is such a big issue, why Saturn still supply engines to China?

    Addendum: China ordered a further 100 AL-31FNs 02/09 so that’s 254 AL-31FNs delivered/ordered to date. Hardly a ringing endorsement of the WS-10a, huh, Showtime?

    What’s wrong? AL-31FN is for J-10. J-11B definitely uses FWS-10. Both are producing hand in hand. It a win win situation for CHinese. If the Russian refuse to deliver or sell. It just a matter of time FWS-10a gets onto J-10.
    And yr article stated, China RESERVED THE RIGHT to put order in 2010. Why not comfirm the deal and must reserved the right? Clearly this is a back up plan for J-10 engine if domestic engine cannot meet the schedule.

    in reply to: Chinese New Generation Fighter will fly soon….. #2434746
    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Halleluja!! The Chinese manage to (just about) pirate the 28 year-old AL-31F- mind the flying corks everybody!!
    Now let’s see if they can pirate this 19 year-old babe in the next decade (back on ice?).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1erYvfTUFL8

    Maybe u are blind or to quick to post.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=1490170&postcount=65

    Pirated? U must be jealous of Chinese success. :rolleyes:

    If not, take back yr words.

    Showtime 100
    Participant

    China is not a democracy and because of that there will never be an official admission than J 10 was based on the Lavi. If some officer does that his head is going to roll. 😉

    That is a lame explanation. :rolleyes:

    What does communist and democracy got to do with J-10 based on Lavi, admisssion or not?

    I think u need to get yr head check.
    😉

    Showtime 100
    Participant

    Why the russians would say that? it is not logic that is only for pride or sell news there must be a good reason and i do not think is just to say lies.
    But of course if you do not want to believe it it is okay

    We need to talk on things based on facts! Pride can be a thing that makes them do that. Some Russian engineer just used assumption to jump to their conclusion.

    The Russian may also under the instruction of their superior to strain relation between US and Israel.

    The fact, it cannot be verify by Janes might be just a makeup story to sell their issue for that month. Actually no such Russian engineer make that comment. Pure rubbish!

    We need facts! U shall know the rules of the game! :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 819 total)