Bill Sweetman- Sting in the tail
My first reaction to photos of the Textron Airland Scorpion was not positive, I will admit. The tandem cockpit, twin canted vertical stabilizers and slender straight wing made it look too much like a Citation wearing a Super Hornet costume for Halloween.
From an operational viewpoint, it seemed to be at risk of falling between two stools: not that much more survivable than a light attack aircraft in the AT-6 or Tucano class, and, in a reconnaissance mission, able to carry the same kind of sensors as a special-mission King Air, but more expensive to buy and fly, and with one very busy weapon systems operator in the rear seat.
Before I went to Farnborough I ran those twin tails past some people I know who really design airplanes. The Scorpion passed this test: the fuselage was wide enough, I was told, to cause problems with body slipstream blanketing the tail at high angles of attack. Two tails could be lighter than the tall single fin that would be required to get some fin area above the body wake. (I’m looking at you, M-346.)
Next, it was a matter of venturing to the Textron display, located somewhere in Surrey, to talk to Textron Airland’s president Bill Anderson and chief engineer Dale Tutt.
In person, the Scorpion is quite big -– at 21,250 lb. max take-off weight it is about the size of the M-346 or a Citation Excel, it carries a 9,300 pound useful load, and it stands well clear of the ground. As a jet, it offers much greater speed and altitude capability than a King Air or AT-6, Anderson points out.
…..
fair point as the french would also pick up a service contract for M2K from the PAF looks like it could a good pay day for the French
but the biggest question is if Pakistan can afford it. French equipment, while reliable and capable, is also damn expensive and service contracts are also the same. IAF officers are on record stating that Mirage spares cost an arm and a leg but they’re delivered on time and quality issues don’t arise.
Introducing a new type, that too French, will cost a lot. New facilities, new ground infra, training, spares, weapons, all add up and it ain’t cheap. the US subsidizes Pakistani purchases, the Chinese offer generous credits, the French won’t do anything of that sort. IMO, it’ll be a costly decision to go for those unless the UAE decides it wants to “gift” these jet and their weapons.
Previously, Egypt and Libya were mentioned as the most likely customers for the UAE’s Mirages..wonder what happened to those negotiations.
How does Pakistan propose to fund the purchase of the UAE’s Mirage-2000-9s? Is the UAE proposing to donate these to the PAF?
The predicted date of FOC for LCA Tejas MK1: 2003 (The initial prediction) –> 2008 (2003) –> 2011 (2008) –> 2012 (2010) –> 2013 (2011) –> 2015 (2013) –> No early than 2016 (The newest prediction now)…… :angel:
HAL: “We are always ahead of our time for at least two years!!:eagerness:”
some of the capabilities that the IAF is insisting the LCA Mk1 have at the time of its FOC itself are capabilities that other aircraft don’t have even after having entered squadron service..for instance, the ability to fire BVR missiles or to have air-to-air refueling capability. Nevertheless, I’d wait to see a more official source for this, rather than some anonymous “source”. It’s a fact that many of the stories we see are actually plants made at the behest of vested interests.
Most likely shot down by pro Russian separatists. Obviously a mistake, but is this going to draw others directly into the conflict?