It has a lot to do with being able to scale up Tejas assembly quickly. HAL now states that it wants to be an integrator, like Boeing and wants to out-source the bulk of the production to private sector companies in order to be able to ramp up to 20-25 Tejas fighters per year.
local-production-of-us-f-16-f/a-18-not-attractive-hal-chairman-suvarna-raju
Of course, the case against Gripen could come down to Tejas as well… why on earth would anyone buy Tejas if you are already building a better aircraft in the exact same weight class? A Gripen NG would beat Tejas in essentially every single way, unless you count satisfying Indian nationalism among the criteria…
At least an F-16 would slot in between Tejas and India’s heavier aircraft.
And what would be the price point for a Gripen NG built in India, in your opinion?
Indian interest in a single engine fighter serves another purpose. It keeps those manufacturers away from entertaining any PAF interest (when one takes the volume into into consideration). But yes, the realisation of this project does not bode well for Tejas…a pity indeed.
I doubt the PAF was seriously considering any of the manufacturers the IAF is talking to. They could not afford the 8 F-16 Block 52s without aid, remember? That sale almost had gone through had it not been for Pakistan refusing to pay for the F-16s on their own. And if the F-16 was too expensive then no other fighter in the list is going to be affordable in any serious numbers.
Do you really think that is true in terms of air-frame performance? Does the Tejas have the agility, the climb rate, the ITR/STR to compete on equal grounds with such a high performance air-fame like the MIG-29?
I have no doubt it comes closer than the MiG-21 does, in both performance and sensor systems, but….
Well, the ITR will likely match that of the MiG-29 from what we’ve seen in airshow performances as well as from the fact that the IAF’s original ASR for the LCA drew (as hard to meet as it was) the ITR and STR from the best of what both the Mirage-2000 and MiG-29 had to offer. the Tejas met the ITR requirement (which was supposedly to match the Mirage-2000’s specs), but fell slightly short on the STR, which is something that is being optimized.
We know that the MiG-29 has a higher T/W ratio than the Tejas Mk1 and will likely out turn it in a guns-only dogfight, if the Tejas pilot gets into a turning fight. So, I don’t expect the Tejas to be able to out-turn a MiG-29 a slower speeds, which is one of the best in the business when it comes to that. I’m quite certain that in the coming years, the IAF Tejas squadrons will develop tactical doctrines to tackle such high performance fighters like the MiG-29 and Mirage-2000 and also the TVC equipped MKI.
It’s a no-brainer when compared to the MiG-21. The FCS that allows carefree handling alone puts it in a different league than the MiG-21 where a lot of the pilot’s attention went into not exceeding limits.
How is that possible? even if you discount the initial cost difference between Mig-21 and LCA. The operating cost of LCA would be significantly higher given the advanced equipment installed, which requires on-going maintenance.
Wasn’t Mig-21 meant to be cheap and cheerful low end fighter?
Cost to operate and cost to maintain are different. Besides which, maintenance schedules for the newer generation fighters are such that the MTBO allows for greater usage and lower downtimes. Component failure rates will also generally be better and spares should be easier to procure than for the out of production MiG-21s. And when I said footprint, I meant that the Tejas was designed to be able to use the existing facilities that were set up for MiG-21s at forward airbases, such as the hardened shelters.
First pic of the Astra in IAF livery, if I’m not mistaken.
Likely just a dummy that’s on display. the Astra hasn’t yet been inducted into the IAF, nor has the Brahmos ALCM which is mounted on the centerline hard point.
IAF combat aircraft and helis on static display and flypasts at the Air Force Day parade
Su-30MKI with Brahmos, R-77BVR missile, Astra BVR missile, R-73 WVR missile and FAB 250 bombs

Mi-17V5

Sarang display team with Dhruv ALH



Surya Kiran display team with the Hawk



Tejas



Pilatus PC-7 Mk2
C-130J

C-17 escorted by Su-30MKIs

Dhruv Mk3

Mirage-2000I

You make a fair point. I guess I really meant ‘French marketing’ when I said that. Although based on TWR (0.95) and short-arm canard arrangement I doubt the Gripen NG will get past M1.1 on supercruise. As a rule of thumb, dry thrust must be considerably greater than empty weight, for decent supercruise.
Dry Thrust/Empty Weight
Gripen NG – 0.92
Rafale C – 1.02
Typhoon – 1.13
F-22 – 1.11
This is old data. Check the Gripen E brochure that was posted earlier on this thread. The Empty Weight is now shown as 8000 kg. The T/W ratio considering dry thrust and empty weight will be significantly worse considering the actual Empty Weight.
Jaguar IM with the Harpoon AShM. This is the first time that a clear shot has been taken. There was an earlier pic of it carrying the Harpoon but this is way clearer.

First proper photo of an IAF Jaguar IM with the Harpoon anti-ship missile straight from ASTE.
The Harpoon will replace the older Sea Eagle missile in service with IAF’s Jaguar IM fleet.
credits:Tarmak007