dark light

BlackArcher

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 3,242 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2201056
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    It has a lot to do with being able to scale up Tejas assembly quickly. HAL now states that it wants to be an integrator, like Boeing and wants to out-source the bulk of the production to private sector companies in order to be able to ramp up to 20-25 Tejas fighters per year.

    local-production-of-us-f-16-f/a-18-not-attractive-hal-chairman-suvarna-raju

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2201061
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Of course, the case against Gripen could come down to Tejas as well… why on earth would anyone buy Tejas if you are already building a better aircraft in the exact same weight class? A Gripen NG would beat Tejas in essentially every single way, unless you count satisfying Indian nationalism among the criteria…

    At least an F-16 would slot in between Tejas and India’s heavier aircraft.

    And what would be the price point for a Gripen NG built in India, in your opinion?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2201448
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Indian interest in a single engine fighter serves another purpose. It keeps those manufacturers away from entertaining any PAF interest (when one takes the volume into into consideration). But yes, the realisation of this project does not bode well for Tejas…a pity indeed.

    I doubt the PAF was seriously considering any of the manufacturers the IAF is talking to. They could not afford the 8 F-16 Block 52s without aid, remember? That sale almost had gone through had it not been for Pakistan refusing to pay for the F-16s on their own. And if the F-16 was too expensive then no other fighter in the list is going to be affordable in any serious numbers.

    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Do you really think that is true in terms of air-frame performance? Does the Tejas have the agility, the climb rate, the ITR/STR to compete on equal grounds with such a high performance air-fame like the MIG-29?

    I have no doubt it comes closer than the MiG-21 does, in both performance and sensor systems, but….

    Well, the ITR will likely match that of the MiG-29 from what we’ve seen in airshow performances as well as from the fact that the IAF’s original ASR for the LCA drew (as hard to meet as it was) the ITR and STR from the best of what both the Mirage-2000 and MiG-29 had to offer. the Tejas met the ITR requirement (which was supposedly to match the Mirage-2000’s specs), but fell slightly short on the STR, which is something that is being optimized.

    We know that the MiG-29 has a higher T/W ratio than the Tejas Mk1 and will likely out turn it in a guns-only dogfight, if the Tejas pilot gets into a turning fight. So, I don’t expect the Tejas to be able to out-turn a MiG-29 a slower speeds, which is one of the best in the business when it comes to that. I’m quite certain that in the coming years, the IAF Tejas squadrons will develop tactical doctrines to tackle such high performance fighters like the MiG-29 and Mirage-2000 and also the TVC equipped MKI.

    It’s a no-brainer when compared to the MiG-21. The FCS that allows carefree handling alone puts it in a different league than the MiG-21 where a lot of the pilot’s attention went into not exceeding limits.

    BlackArcher
    Participant

    How is that possible? even if you discount the initial cost difference between Mig-21 and LCA. The operating cost of LCA would be significantly higher given the advanced equipment installed, which requires on-going maintenance.

    Wasn’t Mig-21 meant to be cheap and cheerful low end fighter?

    Cost to operate and cost to maintain are different. Besides which, maintenance schedules for the newer generation fighters are such that the MTBO allows for greater usage and lower downtimes. Component failure rates will also generally be better and spares should be easier to procure than for the out of production MiG-21s. And when I said footprint, I meant that the Tejas was designed to be able to use the existing facilities that were set up for MiG-21s at forward airbases, such as the hardened shelters.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2011778
    BlackArcher
    Participant
    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2011782
    BlackArcher
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2202022
    BlackArcher
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2202024
    BlackArcher
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2202030
    BlackArcher
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2202033
    BlackArcher
    Participant
    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2202348
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    First pic of the Astra in IAF livery, if I’m not mistaken.

    Likely just a dummy that’s on display. the Astra hasn’t yet been inducted into the IAF, nor has the Brahmos ALCM which is mounted on the centerline hard point.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2202366
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    IAF combat aircraft and helis on static display and flypasts at the Air Force Day parade

    Su-30MKI with Brahmos, R-77BVR missile, Astra BVR missile, R-73 WVR missile and FAB 250 bombs

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14492518_1285743454822435_2230366019281944666_n.jpg?oh=ff40c8a58f762f99aeb52afc4b7b570f&oe=58A42F03

    Mi-17V5

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14633012_1285743398155774_1120859492819025626_n.jpg?oh=47d28a0968b5f973d1d4ba28d111c396&oe=58A5820A

    Sarang display team with Dhruv ALH

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14517362_1285743954822385_891426754530502248_n.jpg?oh=9852c8e931d8e5f43195418657bdeed0&oe=58A0A703

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14650697_1285742591489188_1449935430348652533_n.jpg?oh=850edf630296142e4a8e5a07835f26f4&oe=586868B2

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14563320_1285742698155844_4743022491523468464_n.jpg?oh=db64d461f2eca4f37291acc3666428aa&oe=589F82BC
    Surya Kiran display team with the Hawk

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14657362_1285742554822525_2358043070803961526_n.jpg?oh=89a9b393f08f7a899b8af1f39096fffa&oe=5861E336

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14568249_1285743691489078_5753378049327539277_n.jpg?oh=e9dada752a8724a2c3121ad5854b6e16&oe=58A7408D

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14568077_1285742941489153_6478048806913063546_n.jpg?oh=8221eae8e5ef47d8a5e272531f5d908f&oe=586E301C

    Tejas

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14523126_1285743358155778_3504964121201634516_n.jpg?oh=9b09d660f690fc4910c60cd32545b88c&oe=58688770

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14523234_1285743208155793_2626107598115738735_n.jpg?oh=b1f5eb08cde81566d5bae94b0e5c0c74&oe=5862A11D

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14485171_1285742571489190_1182201442126456984_n.jpg?oh=04b0f67614ec5e8e1965677e624481c5&oe=58A68465

    Pilatus PC-7 Mk2
    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14650755_1285742861489161_2054664106425734273_n.jpg?oh=24ab1b419edf6433b58b775ca8dad471&oe=586319BC

    C-130J

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14656397_1285742461489201_1255893222934955852_n.jpg?oh=652a454a4984f968fbd29b9ccc646960&oe=58A12D14

    C-17 escorted by Su-30MKIs

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14581446_1285743334822447_1648068658309514810_n.jpg?oh=60047e7fffe0ef32d315730df2e952eb&oe=589E4841

    Dhruv Mk3

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14600930_1285743464822434_1112184067436042158_n.jpg?oh=bf5dc8fd1f2a544aca40b126095eeb29&oe=586D15A8

    Mirage-2000I

    https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14604839_1285743508155763_2794540784364496157_n.jpg?oh=c971bcdaee4ef4c65933801aeb6ba4e0&oe=586DD206

    in reply to: Did Gripen emerge as the king of the Eurocanards? #2202656
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    You make a fair point. I guess I really meant ‘French marketing’ when I said that. Although based on TWR (0.95) and short-arm canard arrangement I doubt the Gripen NG will get past M1.1 on supercruise. As a rule of thumb, dry thrust must be considerably greater than empty weight, for decent supercruise.

    Dry Thrust/Empty Weight
    Gripen NG – 0.92
    Rafale C – 1.02
    Typhoon – 1.13
    F-22 – 1.11

    https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/gripenng_holanda_specs_2009.jpg

    This is old data. Check the Gripen E brochure that was posted earlier on this thread. The Empty Weight is now shown as 8000 kg. The T/W ratio considering dry thrust and empty weight will be significantly worse considering the actual Empty Weight.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2202786
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Jaguar IM with the Harpoon AShM. This is the first time that a clear shot has been taken. There was an earlier pic of it carrying the Harpoon but this is way clearer.

    https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14642309_1285063894890391_7206868792959440704_n.jpg?oh=48fe5aa1993773f255b36fd26460add0&oe=5862B2CD

    First proper photo of an IAF Jaguar IM with the Harpoon anti-ship missile straight from ASTE.

    The Harpoon will replace the older Sea Eagle missile in service with IAF’s Jaguar IM fleet.

    credits:Tarmak007

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 3,242 total)