India signs deal for 4 more P-8I Neptunes
India’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) signed a USD1 billion deal with Boeing on 27 July for four additional P-8I Neptune long-range maritime multi-mission aircraft for the Indian Navy (IN), official and industry sources said.
The aircraft, which are being acquired via a direct commercial sale with Boeing and the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) route with the US government for its weaponry, will supplement eight other P-8Is the IN acquired in 2009 for USD2.1 billion. All eight aircraft were delivered by 2015.
..With an operational range of 1,200 n miles each of the four new P-8Is will be equipped with Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems’ newly designed AN/APY-10 multi-mission maritime, littoral and overland surveillance radar capable of providing high-resolution images in land and sea modes.
They will also be armed with Harpoon Block II anti-ship missiles and Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems Mk 54 Mod 0 lightweight anti-submarine warfare torpedoes capable of being released from a height of about 6 km.
Official sources pointed out, however, that for now the new P-8Is, just like the previous eight, will not be delivered with secure and encrypted communication suites and electronic warfare (EW) systems.
The reason for this is that India has yet to sign two ‘foundational agreements’ that direct such transfers: the Communication Interoperability and Security Memorandum Agreement (CISMoA) and the Basic Exchange and Co-operation Agreement for Geo-Spatial Co-operation (BECA).
I was not sure at the beginning but now it seems quite clear.. much of that is India’s fault.. you are unable to operate pretty much any aircraft beyond the ~65% serviceability rate, not MiGs, not Sukhois, not Jags, not Hawks, nothing.. Good luck trying to blame others but whenever India is discussed, we always end up with bureaucracy, lack of planning, flawed contracts and delayed deliveries.
And frankly, I don’t give sh!t for a second whether you take offense to that.. I won’t call snow black just to satisfy your nationalistic jingoism..
Butt hurt, obviously. “overhaul does not equate to maintenance”.. lol..
whatever, one more worthless POS added to the ignore list.
paging Teer..I remember having read many of his posts on BRF that mentioned that the IN was facing a lot of teething issues with the MiG-29K fleet. Back then we didn’t have any authoritative source to back that up, but now I guess we do.
I have witnessed Indian corruption first hand. I also have seen how some companies handle their production and how well maintained their facilities are. Some good, some real bad.
So are you implying that corruption is an Indian phenomenon? Where are you from by the way? Some corruption free country is it? My guess is you won’t disclose it.
But answer me this, if the Russians and others who have used similar aircraft have not mentioned such issues, but India has, as well as having a history of using both east and west jets with spotty maintenance and serviceability, gives me a clearer picture. Calling a horse for what it is.
As Austin mentioned in an earlier post of his, the fact that organizations like the CAG exist, whose audit reports are made public is not something that all nations have. If you’re implying that the RuAF and RuN have glitch-free operations or that their serviceability for their fleets is very high, then post the proof of that. Not sure you’ll have any of that.
I don’t care if you want to complain thinking many of us are shifting blame to India. But you have not brought anything forward as I have went through this thread.
You’re doing that without ANY EVIDENCE that it is the IN’s fault !! Pure conjecture, based on stereotypical notions. Excuse me if I take offense to that.
I am a little confused, what is ALH exactly? Just Druhv?
17 air-frames made over two years, and ALL of them dumped?
I think they were referring to Technical Acceptance. Flaws must have existed which meant that they were not accepted until the issues seen during acceptance were resolved. Very different from dumping them, as in just putting them in storage or just retiring them. If one reads the audit report one might get a better idea.
I personally think you know diddly squat just about anything discussed here.. Next time, please get TF out of my way and don’t talk to me.. I will do the same..
Pot calling the kettle black..
I don’t take any pleasure in talking to you and I mostly ignore the stuff you write, at least those related to the IAF or IN. But you wade into topics that you haven’t the foggiest idea about, and then expect others not to engage you. Why not just keep quiet or ask in a manner that isn’t condescending or demeaning?
Mikoyan faces a few issues. Recently they at least obtained sokol plant. So that may fix a lot of issues. But being part of UAC doesn’t mean a whole lot really. Companies are still quite independent.
While I understand frustrations of Indian members, we need to be open about this issue. How come Indians face these issues while others do not? Common issue with other nations is lack of spare parts,same goes for India. But India has had bad luck with a lot of jets in the past, and well, corruption altogether (stealing parts as an example). If Russia was the one fully providing the maintenance, then they would fully be at fault, but…
Now add in that Russia fields the MiG-29K’s as well (20 of them) and we all have seen pics of their use. Why is it they are not seeing issues? Much like how Su-30MKI got flack yet many other countries use Irkutsk Su-30 aircraft with nowhere near the problems the Indians claim. Russia doesn’t hide the issues of their jets as they fully mentioned about issues of Su-35S and Su-34’s, etc. Hence why they are used extensively in Syrian cconflict. As well, they use Su-30SM and those have been extensively used in Syria.
Anyway, will be interesting to know outcome of this. I know Egypt is getting a ton of MiG-29M’s from Russia so if there is an issue with Mikoyan and its development of MiG-29, we will hear about it.
lol..more of the same- “it must be India’s fault”..read the audit report!! this is a Comptroller and Auditor General report that the IN has to respond to. To suggest that “parts are stolen” or corruption leads to all this is laughable!
And just because you see pics of RuN MiG-29Ks and KUBs means nothing. There are plenty of pics of IN MiG-29K and KUBs flying around INS Hansa and onboard the carrier INS Vikramaditya as well. That doesn’t inform you about availability or reliability issues. Until there are such audit reports made public that back up your assertion that the RuN faces no such issues, its pure conjecture, nothing else.
cross posting from the IN thread..

Calm down, will you? Asking a question does not equal to pointing fingers.. BTW, it did not escape me that you actually seem to have zero idea about the reasons either and simply want to accuse someone else, for all what’s worth… Next time, restrain from answering if that’s all you can provide..
I don’t have any idea about the exact reasons but nor do you. Yet, you go the extent of suggesting that India might be choosing “cheap maintenance practices” with zero evidence of that. I merely showed that India has been investing steadily in spares support for its Russian sourced fleet. Next time, restrain from making flame bait comments if you have no other evidence to back it up.
You said that there is no evidence that India has local maintenance set up for the MKI fleet and that was proven to be wrong, so now you take a new tack.
Overhaul does not equal maintenance.. And HAL does not equal IAF.. It doesn’t help squat that HAL are able to overhaul Sukhois (they actually make them, so that’s logical) if there’s spares shortage with IAF, logistics is failing or deals get protracted as we have seen many times..
Overhaul is deep maintenance. You tell us that a firm can carry out MRO activities and still doesn’t carry out maintenance? 😀 You know diddly squat about the exact reasons for the low availability, but hey those Indians must be skimping on spares just because you feel so.
Once again… In my response #42 I have asked whether the low serviceability of the MKI was related to the aircraft itself, to Irkut or rather to Indian maintaince contract.. I did not claim I knew what the reasons were..
I am not a Russian poster… And I am not looking for excuses rather than explanations.. which you have not provided beyond the typical finger pointing..
Nowhere have your sources shown a local maintenance facility for Su-30MKI.. That could be reflected in the readiness rates..
You don’t know the reasons for low serviceability and don’t know what capabilities India has invested in for maintaining its MKI fleet, yet you want to point fingers at India first. India is the only country other than Russia that can actually do deep maintenance and overhaul work on its Su-30MKIs.