dark light

Art-J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lovely American colour pics #958022
    Art-J
    Participant

    What’s the plane in the 6th photo down with the crowd around it? Early-model Mustang?

    Most probably. Distinctive canopy opening mechanism, the only well visible detail on the photo, would indicate an early Mustang indeed.

    in reply to: Propellor ID Please guys #967537
    Art-J
    Participant

    Cam assembly is a dead giveaway for Hamilton Standard Hydromatic design, but whether it’s an american prop or licence-built de Havilland one, I cannot tell. The remains of reduction gear, however, will probably be recognized by some of prop anoraks over here :D.

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #955437
    Art-J
    Participant

    Well, “you can’t teach old dog new tricks” as You Anglo-Saxon fellows sometimes say? Paul178 is entitled to have his skewed opinion on the subject (not unusual amongst combat veterans), and will most probably take it to his grave. Fair enough.
    I’d rather see, however, any history preservation institutions being run by people like Mr Pilkington. I think his post well describes what history preservation is all about.

    Art-J
    Participant

    Emile, while we’re at it, You might want to google for Curtiss XP-55 prototype :).

    in reply to: P40 Dennis Copping #971063
    Art-J
    Participant

    Dko, we may not accept this sorry state of affairs easily, however, as Andy pointed out above, from Egyptians point of view we also may shove our “moral obligations” up our… ehm… known locations. The Egyptians have much more serious problems over their heads now and, in the end, their good will (or lack thereof) is going to be THE most important factor in any attempts to bring the plane and pilot remainings home.

    in reply to: 69Yr,s today… #971196
    Art-J
    Participant

    Well, when the WWI ended people also though it was the “war which ended all wars” (although some, like marshal Foch, already felt that would not be the case). The “fighting for bright future” is a neatly-worded bulls..t which drives soldiers to do their job, always has been, always will (people have to be convinced they fight for “the right cause” to be successful at all). Yet, anyone with basic comprehension skills knows the utopian slogans are one thing, while the way the real world works is the other.

    Anyway, faced with a very confusing and kinda-philosophical original question above, I still don’t quite get what You’re up to, actually, and I feel I’m not the only one!

    Cheers.

    in reply to: Grumman Avenger with two highball bombs #982457
    Art-J
    Participant

    A-6E
    E-6A
    EA-6A

    …. and that’s under the new system…..

    (Yes, I know what they all mean – I’m just poking fun)….

    Ken

    Point taken! I’m not into “modern” machinery (actually had to google this E-6A thingy – very interesting!) but looks like the system might still be a bit… puzzling indeed :).

    Cheers – Art

    in reply to: Grumman Avenger with two highball bombs #983097
    Art-J
    Participant

    Thanks God they did it, because the previous system, especially during wartime (e.g. Mitchell being both B-25 and PBJ-1, or Liberator being both B-24 and PB4Y-1), was just getting silly and confusing.

    in reply to: Grumman Avenger with two highball bombs #983138
    Art-J
    Participant

    Since we kinda hijacked the thread anyway… I’d just like to remind, that A-26 becoming B-26 didn’t happen “for no good reason”, but was a result of 1947 complete overhaul of USAF designation system, including “A” for “attack” being dropped and consequently any big thing flying with bombs being renamed to “B” for “bomber”.

    Cheers – Art

    in reply to: colourized photo's #996196
    Art-J
    Participant

    Some nice artwork there, although the guy could have done his homework better – it is “SeIRan” and not “Serian” :eek:. I also have a bit mixed feelings about adding some well-known photos to this gallery, which were colour ones to begin with.

    The engine resemblance to German machinery is not coincidental, since Atsuta engine was indeed licence derivative of DB 601 series.

    in reply to: Making war interesting #968076
    Art-J
    Participant

    What’s the point of spending funds on making it flyable then? 😀

    in reply to: Malcolm Hoods #971776
    Art-J
    Participant

    I wonder what the story behind Malcolms on P-47s is then. I don’t have the scale plans here to compare fuselage geometry between Thunderbolt and Mustang, but with so few P-47s with blown hoods visible on old pictures, I always though these were rather field mods based on P-51 hood…

    in reply to: YF-17 Cobra photos #1002661
    Art-J
    Participant

    Always love the photos of the YF-17 where you can see through the slots in the strakes.
    What were Northrop trying to achieve aerodynamically with these?

    If You’re talking about fourth picture in the last but one row, it has a description below, claiming these slots were the form of boundary layer control. The ones on F-18s are pretty simple deal – If you manage to prevent boundary layer from entering engine inlet, you gotta dump it somewhere and small slots / outlets above are perfect for this. I’m curious though why they were so much longer on YF-17.

    in reply to: GoPro shots (B-24 and P-51 content) #944729
    Art-J
    Participant

    Oh My! so for $299(US) you get a camera and assorted mounts…collar cam of the the dog tearing up the yard, priceless. Imagine a cat chasing a pen laser?? oh the possibilities are endless.

    jim

    Be careful what You wish for, Jim :D:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded*&v=x0jdjRrzIyw

    in reply to: Total number of airworthy WWII aircraft? #953648
    Art-J
    Participant

    Whoa, a damn fine link. Seems to be a good place for a start! Bookmarked.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 33 total)