dark light

parleegee

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2519931
    parleegee
    Participant

    The Answer is no, an American Nimitz Class or Enterprise carrier can not pass through the Panama Canal….yet.

    Looks like a tactical error to built an oversize carrier. Back in the old days, all American battleships were design to slip through the Panama Canal, to avoid the extended transit around Cape Horn.

    in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2520021
    parleegee
    Participant

    Russian 650mm torpedoes can do 100 km at 30knots or 50 km at 50 knots and can carry 20 kt warhead. Does single 20 kt warhead is enogh against wartime CVBG (spread formation)? Also CVBG have couple of LA type subs protecting it.

    the Russian 650mm torpedo (TT-5) weighs about 4.5 tons (about twice standard 533mm torpedo) and it’s about 30 ft long (about 10 ft longer than standard 533mm torpedo). At 30km it probably can do 60 kt. It’s powered by a waterjet/pumpjet(probably to reduced noise). It’s guided by wake-homing sensor(difficult to counter-measured). It tracks down it target by following its wake, so target will have a difficult time to shake it off. Besides nuclear warhead, it can be armed with a thermobaric warhead( yes, there are thermobaric warhead that can function underwater)assuming China transfer the technology to its buddy Russia.

    in reply to: IRBIS and the detection of low RCS targets #2520652
    parleegee
    Participant

    Mig-35 with Phazotron Zhuk-AE AESA radar.

    http://www.oborona.ru/objectdata/UserDefinedUnitImpl/3007965/3007967.jpg

    Credit: coolieno99 @ CDF

    in reply to: IRBIS and the detection of low RCS targets #2520674
    parleegee
    Participant

    I wonder how far away you could detect a 20kw fighter radar.

    It seems like the primary role of Su-35/Irbis-E is to attack AWAC aircrafts.

    Su-35 Flies Again

    September 10, 2007:

    At the recent Russian MAKS 2007 air show in Moscow, the Russian Air Force showed off the first of two flyable prototypes of the Su-35 that are under construction. The first flight of this version of the Su-35 will take place before the end of the year. Nearly a year ago, Russia announced that its long promised Su-35 fighter, was back in development again. The Russians would only say that the Su-35 was undergoing flight testing.
    The Su35 is an enhanced Su-27, and has been in development for over a decade. At one point, it was called the Su-37, but the name was changed back to Su-35. A dozen or more Su-35 prototypes have been built, and apparently no two are identical. The Russians want to sell Su-35s to China, India and other foreign customers. Apparently Russia now has the half billion or so dollars it will take to get the Su-35 development moving again.

    The Su-35 is a 34 ton fighter that is more maneuverable than the original, 33 ton, Su-27, and has much better electronics. It can cruise at above the speed of sound. It also costs at least fifty percent more than the Su-27. That would be some $60 million, about what a top-of-the-line F-16 costs. The Su-27 was originally developed to match the F-15, which is larger than the single engine F-16. The larger size of the Su-27/35, allows designers to do a lot more with it in terms of modifications and enhancements.
    The aircraft shown at MAKS had a new type radar, lots of little structural changes, and a mock up of a Cold War era long-range air-to-air missile hanging from one wing. This missile is believed to be designed to take down U.S. AWACS aircraft.
    The Su-35 is not meant to be a rival for the F-22, because the Russian aircraft is not stealthy. But if the maneuverability and advanced electronics proposed Su-35 live up to the promises, the aircraft would be more than a match for every fighter out there except the F-22. If such an Su-35 was sold for well under $100 million each, there would be a lot of buyers

    Credit: sandyj @ CDF

    in reply to: IRBIS and the detection of low RCS targets #2521837
    parleegee
    Participant

    youtube video on IRBIS-E radar:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yELuKJFDM80&feature=related

    3 m2- 400 to 450 Km.
    0.01 m2- 90 to 115 Km.

    Most powerfull radar at the moment, it has an 20 Kw output.

    source: 2129261184 @ youtube

    in reply to: Could a "Joint Asiatic Fighter" be developed? #2523713
    parleegee
    Participant

    Besides the JF-17, another good example of close cooperation between Pakistan and China is the co-development of the Babur/DH-10 cruise missile.

    in reply to: Japanese Aerospace fading giant or reviving monster? #2538407
    parleegee
    Participant

    Photo of moon crater taken by Kaguya lunar orbiter terrain camera(stereoscopic):

    http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img/20071128_kaguya_tc02_04.jpg

    Source: jaxa.org

    in reply to: Mig-25 vs. SR-71 and XB-70 vs. T-4 #2545658
    parleegee
    Participant

    Youtube video on the Mig-31:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WIqKaBSu0U

    Credit: vizaar@youtube

    in reply to: Mig-25 vs. SR-71 and XB-70 vs. T-4 #2546236
    parleegee
    Participant

    Youtube videos on Sukhoi T-4. The Russians claimed it was the first aircraft to use Fly-By-Wire(FBW) controls.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC8_2OJGq_M&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15l2w-lTPFY&feature=related

    Sukhoi T-4, or “Aircraft 100”, or “Project 100”, or “Sotka” was a Soviet high speed reconnaissance and interceptor aircraft that did not proceed beyond the prototype stage. It is sometimes incorrectly named Su-100.The T-4 was made largely from titanium and stainless steel, and featured a primitive fly-by-wire control systems but also employed a mechanical system as a backup. The aircraft’s nose lowered to provide visibility during takeoff and landing. A periscope was used for forward viewing when the nose was retracted, and could be employed at speeds of up to 373 mph (600 km/h). Braking parachutes were used in addition to conventional wheel brakes.The first T-4, designated “101,” first flew on August 22, 1972. The test pilot was Vladimir Ilyushin, son of famed aircraft designer, Sergei Ilyushin. It has flown only ten times for a total of less than eleven hours. It is believed to have reached at least Mach 1.3 using four Kolesov RD36-41 engines. These engines each produced 16,000 kgf (35,300 lbf or 157 kN) thrust with afterburners. The aircraft was designed to achieve speeds of up to Mach 3.0, but the program was cancelled before the full performance of the aircraft could be determined.One T-4 survives today. Aircraft “101” is on display at the Monino Museum near Moscow. At least two additional prototypes (“102” and “103”) were under construction, but only aircraft “101” was completed and flown before the project was cancelled in 1974 or 1975. The other two prototypes were scrapped.
    General characteristics * Crew: 2 * Length: 44.5 m (146 ft) * Wingspan: 22.0 m (72 ft 2 in) * Height: 11.2 m (36 ft 9 in) * Wing area: 295.7 m² (3,183 ft²) * Empty weight: 55,600 kg (123,000 lb) * Max takeoff weight: 110,000 kg (243,000 lb) * Powerplant: 4× Kolesov RD-36-41 turbofans, 160 kN (35,000 lbf) each
    Performance (estimated) * Maximum speed: 3,200 km/h (1,700 knots, 2,000 mph) * Cruise speed: 3,000 km/h (1,900 mph) * Ferry range: 6,000 km (3,700 mi) * Service ceiling: 20,000-24,000 m (66,000-79,000 ft)

    Credit: zeoul001@youtube

    in reply to: Stealth vs Stealth #2547181
    parleegee
    Participant

    An Exocet/Harpoon class missile is rated as 0.1m2, …

    that’s very good for an object made of metal and not covered with RAM.
    If the cruise missile is liberally coated with multiple coatings of RAM, and constructed entirely of composite materials, thens it’s possible to reduce RCS to size of a gnat. The engine is already buried entirely in the fuselage, so compressor blade reflectivity is not a problem. Its flight profile of hugging the ground lend itself to stealhiness by hiding in radar clutter.

    in reply to: Stealth vs Stealth #2547296
    parleegee
    Participant

    will the f-22 at 70,000 ft able to detect a stealthy cruise missile flying at 100 ft Above Ground Level?

    in reply to: F35 or su35BM #2548094
    parleegee
    Participant

    F-35 detects emissions from SU-35BM at 500km.

    SU-35 cannot detect F-35 until range is less than 25km due to stealth.

    F-35 sets up ambush beyond the detection range of SU-35, launching AIM-120Ds at 80km.

    SU-35 pilot enjoys a nylon letdown.

    F-35 pilot continues mission destroying 8 ground targets using GBU-39s.

    F-35 pilot enjoys a Coke and sandwich back at the DFac.

    It’s basically a pointless thread. The Su-35 being shot down is actually the 3rd wave of attack. The 1st wave of ballistic missiles and 2nd wave of cruise missiles have already destroyed the F-35 base.

    in reply to: Su-27 vs Su-35(BM) #2548523
    parleegee
    Participant

    youtube video on Sukhoi Flanker. Most of it shows the canard-winglet(MKI type) version.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVl_f7g4NxY&feature=related

    in reply to: S-400 Battery Components #1791577
    parleegee
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian ATGMs? #1791626
    parleegee
    Participant

    I believe this is the latest Russian ATGM, the “Chrysanthemum”(a flower).:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9StN1oNNCA

    Hrisanteme (chrysanthemum) is new russian missle system wich may destroy any existent and next tanks even with “dynamic” (reactive)armor (over 1 meter).Besides its missles (the best ones nowadays!) have supersonic speed and also may eliminate concrete bunkers,buildings, low flying aircrafts and helicopters, storm-boats.3 such units may destroy over 14 tanks!2 pointing system – radio-locating (automaticaly detects and tracking target, tracking missile, 100-150GH) and lazar – provides attacking 2 targets in a time.
    ammunitions – 15 missiles (armour-piercing or high-explosive heads)
    Crew – 2
    Source: gromoslawski@youtube

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)