In my “old” dslr, a Kodak KDC-520C ( a digital Eos-1n) I use severall 246 cards. I can shoot around 130 pics on each of them. In my 10D I am using a 512 card. You can decide either to shoot in RAW or in JPG. As I go for the best quality I only shoot in RAW. This means that I can shoot some 40 photo’s on a 256 card. However, in stead of buying lots of cards, I have bought a Xdrive. This is a small device (size of a package of cigarettes), with a 30 GB harddisk in it. When my CF card is full, I put it in the Xdrive, it transfers all its photo’s to the Xdrive, and I can use the CF card again. Bought it very cheap by powersinnumbers in Australia. This sound far away, but I had it in Holland in 4 days time. Works perfect. I also bought a 512 card with them, for around 40% of what I have to pay here for it. I am going to look for their adress.
BW Roger
A 10D, the same one I use(d) (I say used as mine broke down after 400 shots and is now already 5 weeks with Canon. I understood they have send it to Japan as they couldn’t “heal” it in Europe. Strange problem as the camera only worked with the AF out. As soon as AF was on, it went on “error 99”). You are going to like digital shooting, it makes taking photographs so much more satifying. BW Roger
“
“Digital is a go go”
What are going to buy? BW Roger
Not a big help I am afraid, as I don’t print normally. Last week I printed some big ones 20 by 30 and 30 by 40 as a test, just to see the difference betweeen slide/negative and digital. On all occasions, the print from the digital (Eos 10D) ws the best. Super sharp, good colours and absolutely no grain. they looked as if they came from a large format camera. To be honest, both slide and colour negative prints were made of 100 ISO film, while I shot the digital on 400 ISO, so if I put the DSLR on 100 ISO, the result must be even better.
One of the main drawbacks of printing yourself is the extreme high cost of the ink. So unless you can get them for free (the ink cartreges) I suggest to shoot digital, then give the shots some “cleaning up” (dust removing, sharpenning) and burn them on a CD. Then bring that CD to your local photoshop and asked them to print them for you. The result are good, and cheap prints (much more cheaper than on yopur own printer).
Here in Holland some photoshops have a small digital (Sony) lab. Here you can put your CF card in a machine, the images apear on a screen and you can print them yourself. Price for a 30 by 40 in Holland is around 3 P.St.
If you want to print on your own machine, buy a printer where there are seperate containers for each colour, so you only have to refill the empty ones. A friend of mine has a Canon printer that can print great pictures up to 30 by 40 cm.
Enclosed shot was taken with a 100 – 400 MM lens which on my DSLR became a 160 – 650 mm or so. I took the machine with 650 mm.
BW Roger
There is no reason to wait untill something “better” will emerge in a year time. 6Mp is already an overkill for most. I bought a 6MP Canon DSLR a few weeks ago, and up to 30 by 40 cm prints, it wins from my slide prints, and is far superior to print/negative film. With a 6 MP camera you can photograph for years to come. Don’t forget that if you wait for an 8 or 10 MP one, this only is an advantage if you print 60 by 80 or so. The disadvantages are that you need a heavy computer also, and lots of CF cards.
In january I bought a digital DSLR, after shooting 27 years on slides. Since, 95% of what I photographed I did on digital, with only 13 rolls of slide so far.
Given the fact that shooting digital is cheaper (you can select only the good shots, so you can shoot what you want and select later), the smaller sensor enlarges your telezoom by 60 % ( so suddenly your 75-300 becomes a 110- 500), and you can “play” with your iso, depending on time and weather/light. all advantages that makes taking shots with a DSLR so much more fun. However, DSLR’s are so “sharp” that indeed if you work on cheap “glass”, they can be very unforgiving as all the “mistakes” in the lens will hit you hard. But setting your iso settings to eg 200 or 400, and working on a lenssetting of F8, the effect will be good aswell. BW Roger
The Beverly without doubt? Props rule over jets as far as I am concerned, and let’s fce it, there are still Vulcan’s enough around. BW Roger
I’ll go there Thursday evening Alastair, and I shall make some photographs. I’ll mail them to you, together with an adress. I’ll check out who is going to do the restauration, as he will be the best contact. Thanks for you help and interest in the project. You can have a look at their site, the MG-2 isn’t there (yet), but it gives an idea. http://www.crash40-45.nl
Best wishes, Roger
Caught cheating 1
Caught cheating 1
Stuka ! BW Roger
Why go for dishwater if you can get Champagne???:D 😀 😀 Guess I don’t have to call you then Damien when I have a vacent seat during the A to A session ( as always not joking) ?? :p :p :p
BW Roger
I have tears in my eyes! Remember it, as it isn’t there anymore. Destroyed by preserving it 😡 BW Roger
Connie 99% , DC-2 100%.
That’s all I can say. I have very good hopes. BW Roger
YES!!!!