I’ve got to wonder *why* exactly the F-35 on the heavy side of things compared to earlier specifications? If I recall, earlier figures listed a target maximum empty weight of 26,500 lbs for the F-35A and 30,000 lbs for the F-35B and F-35C.

In terms of dimensions the F-35 is smaller than the F-105, F-106, and other large single engine fighters, yet even the F-35A is a good deal heavier.

Indeed there are many more avionics in the F-35 than these ’60s era aircraft, but surely the use of a high percentage of composite materials makes up for that.

I trust that Lockheed will correct the problems encountered thus far in development, and from a materials perspective I don’t see why costs can’t be made comparable to the Super Hornet or other 4.5 generation aircraft. But if anything about the F-35 has me nervous it’s the sheer weight. With the powerful F135 engine and advancements in aircraft design, I fully believe the F-35 can meet performance specifications and compare well to the F-16 and F/A-18. But what about future growth? Won’t we want this aircraft carrying internal ECM systems at a later date for example?

May your words be true brother. F 35B&29Ks made for each other.

What makes you say that? Seems like an odd pairing?

So how are the critics taking the fact that the F-35B’s exhaust didn’t blast the crew overboard, cut a hole through the deck, and sink the ship?