dark light

savage-rabbit

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 306 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-100 vs. MiG-19 #2660765
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Isn’t J-6 a Mig-19?

    Yes, they are mostly similar. Alot of the J/F-6 production run was of low quality when compared with the MiG-19 due to the dispruptive effects of civil strife in China. The last J/F-6 variants were of much better quality and improved on many of the MiG-19s flaws. There is also a renosed variant of the J/F-6 known as the A/Q-5 which is still in service.

    in reply to: Croatia #2661820
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Mi-24 have not fly since ’99 and they will be scarped.

    That’s what I heard too, due to ” … the deteriorated condidtion of the airframes.”. Is it true that the surplus MiG-21bis are to be sold off? I also saw some speculations in the Croat press that Italy or Hugary would take responsibility for Croat airspace and that the MiG-21s are slated for scrapping in 2006?

    in reply to: Croatia #2661950
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Can someone answer my original question about whether or not Croatia is still training new Mig-21 pilots?

    Also, is any other country involved in training Croatian pilots?

    Also, if the Mi-24 fleet is soon to be retired, will anything replace them?

    The last I knew the Croat air force had some 8xMiG-21Bis and 4xMiG-21UM refurbished (zerotimed?) as well as subjected to a limited upgrade to the Communications, IFF and Navigation systems by Aerostary in Romania. Of course that was 8-12 months ago. I’d actually like to get some current information on Croat plans vis a vi the MiG-21 myself. It seems to me that unless something has radically changed for the Croat AF since this delivery took place in 2004 we can conclude that they intend to continue operating the MiG-21 in which case they must be training new pilots. The reason for the MiG-21 upgrade is that the Croat MOD seems to be anticipating that Nato will empose upon them that they secure their own airspace in which case they must have something, and the reduced MiG-21 upgrade by Aerostar was the bare minimum reqired for the MiG to fulfill this role. There is an interesting article here (sorry 🙁 googe cache only) that explains the fiscal realities facing the Corat AF and why people speculating on Croatia buying a few dozen F-16s or Gripens in the near future are dreaming. 😀 Admittedly the text is two years old but it echoes what I have been hearing from Croatian aircraft buffs quite recently.

    in reply to: Croatia #2662257
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Say, can anybody tell me where I can buy this interesting book I found on the balkan website Hawk 75 mentioned or who publishes it? My serbocroatian is a bit rusty 😀

    http://www.yuairwar.com/images/HRZnaslovnica.jpg

    in reply to: Afghans want their aircrafts back from Pakistan #2607588
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Maybe donate a few F-7Ps!?

    Not a bad idea except the F-7MP is Chinese. Would that go down well with Uncle Sam? As far as Washington is concerned Afghanistan is now in its “sphere of influence”…

    in reply to: The First Hungarian GRIPEN rolls out. #2607722
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    I wish Asia could get a few but too Thailand could offer nothing but frozen chicken.

    Eh? I’ve heard about fighters being paid for in palmoil coffee and sugar but chickens?

    in reply to: Interesting website #2608521
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Thanks.This is a very usefull site!

    Dude! I second that.

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2608542
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Okay seeing as I started this thread I think I should try to adjudicate. I did not compare the capabilities of these two aircraft in relation to each other or any other type. I don’t even think that is quantifiable though on the face of it the F22 should come out on top. I was talking about the cost of the Typhoon and comparing that to the cost of the F22 and trying as hard as I might to find out the real costs using yourselves as fellow aviation nuts to help me find out what the real costs are because I am interested.

    I am not interested in anti British, anti American, anti Russian or anti whatever BS because some small minded idiot has a cross to bear and a chip on his/her shoulder, a bias point of view and thinks that the Brits or the Yanks or the Ruskies or anybody else can’t build a decent fighter plane worth a damn (scuse the Americanism).

    I’m talking about costs so for christs sake get a grip and, if you have a mind, tell me what you know, what you think you know or what you have read about it and try to keep the arguing to a minimum and try to come to some kind of consensus. It matters not one jot to the sales prospects of these machines based on somebody’s opinion of the people who built it.

    Thanks

    Phil

    I don’t give a hoot a about American/European/Russian bashing. The whole point of that DERA simulation seems to have been assess the potential of the F-22 and the Typhoon relative to the same hypothetical opponent. As far as I can tell it was a classic benchmark comparisons. That boils down to finding out how much better is the exchange rate for the F-22 vs the benchmark when compared with the exchange rate for the Typhoon vs the benchmark. I short how much better is the F-22 than the Typhoon. This translates diectly into establishing a monetary yardstick for calculating bang for buck simple enough for Senators/Members of Parilament to use. As it turned out the exchange rate for the F-22 was twice that for the Typhoon so if you can get (just for the sake of argument) three Typhoons for the price of one F-22 you would tend to be paying more than you have to for the F-22 wouldn’t you since your three Typhoons will do more killing than your single F-22 for the same amount of money. If not congratualtions you got a bargain in your F-22. That’s how the beancounters will do the math, that’s how they will present it to the senators/members-of-parliament. Neither beancounters nor politicians are all that interested in the finer points of military theory, just the bottom line. Simple economics for Senators/MPs.

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2608576
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    There never was any Raptor vs Typhoon simulation, and I have never alluded to such simulations. However, they had done real tests against the Eagles, and probably simulated tests against the Flanker. What I had initiallly argued (and my point all along) was that the tests done by the Brits was probably based on their best guess of the Raptor’s capabilities at that time, and not based on any concrete data given by the US. Following that, I said that I preferred to judge the Raptor based on tests done by the USAF on the Raptor…

    What you are then saying is that USAF simulations would be more accurate? That presupposes that the USAF data on the Typhoon is by default more accurate than British/Eruopean data on the F-22 which I find rather doubtful. The Typhoon is not a super stealth design but given the degree of composite materials its airframe uses it is not exactly trivial to model or at least not quite as easy to model as an older metal heavy design would be. Keep in mind also that pitting both the Typhoon and the F-22 against the same aircraft is actually comparing them, though in a roudabout way using an imagined Su-35 as a benchmark. The accuracy of hte Su-35 approximation did not matter in that context, simply how well each aircraft did when competing with the benchmark.

    in reply to: Mig-21 pics of ALL user countries #2608584
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Q: Which is the most advanced version of Mig-21/F/J series ? In terms of

    Avionics and …

    MiG-21 ‘Bison’

    …Manoeuvrebelity?..

    F-7PG/J-7G

    More pictures:
    Iraqi oddfellows, an F-7M and a MiG-21Bis, both in a sorry state:

    in reply to: Mig-21 pics of ALL user countries #2608744
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    I don’t think so… Unless you’re also counting the F-7 as a Mig-21, it is operated by only a few countries, ie Pakistan and Zimbabwe.

    What else would the J/F-7 be other than a Chinese MiG-21? A novel type of electric toaster? 😀

    As for operators:

    Albania
    Pakistan
    Bangladesh
    Egypt
    Iraq
    Iran
    Sudan
    Tanzania
    Burma
    Sri Lanka
    Zimbabwe
    North Korea
    Yemen

    And and of course the PRC

    That’s 14 J/F-7 user nations, curent and past, did I forget anybody????

    As for Soviet built MiGs:
    An upgraded Egyptian MiG-21MF
    A Ugandan MiG-21Sparka
    There are also some pictures of Ugandan single seaters here:
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/724023/L/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/724024/L/

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2608995
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Strange. I would think the USAF more than capable of conducting such analysis on their own. They would have already analysed sonthing like this to death long before the Brits did their simulation.

    The assumption wold be they got similar information inexchange for their own simulations. Of cours if these simlultaions are are based on approximated data like you say they are really fairly worthless. Keep in mind that US simulations would be just as inaccurate without similar data on the Typhoon, knowing is aways better than guessing even in the USA. Let´s just wait for the outcome of the first real Aircraft to Aricraft engagement simulations, they are bound to happen within the next what, three years? We will see soon enough how cost effective the Typhoon is Vs the F-22 when that data rolls in. Until then of cours computer simulations are all we have, like it or not. That being said I´m still not going to swallow a killrate of 20:1 for the F-22 vs the Typhoon that some of the more outrageous US F-22 groupies are claiming.

    Going by your reasoning they might as well give data to the Germans and anyone else that goes along to Red Flag. Horrors! What happens if the Frenchies are participating in Red Flag too? I’m sorry, but I believe the brits just approximated the information they had then on the Raptor and went ahead with the simulation. I would rather believe a simulation which the USAF did on their own, or better, info from the IOT&E. The IOT&E had a very interesting scenario, BTW – Attacking an enemy AEW&C platform, guarded by 4 F-15s, IIRC.

    I was just pointing out that information exhange was not compeletely unthinkable. I´m hoping that Europe and the US are still allies even if certain European and American leaders are behaving like a bunch of teenage girls. As for the French they will get their own data on the efficienccy of the F-22 stealth system as soon a they get to send some of their Rafales againt the F-22. Rest assured the French just like the Germans and the Britsh wil otfit their aircraft with recording eqipment to thoroughly analyze F-22 stealth performance vs. their fighters radars, passive IR sensors etc. The entire world is already working on ways to take the teeth out of stealth. Alot of the F-22s value for money rating rest sqarely on how hard it will be to neutralize stealth technology

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2609096
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    “If the US trusts anybody with F-22 data it would be the British.” Agreed, but then the US wouldn’t just give away the data on its weapon systems unless the Brits had a need to know, ie they are both involved in utilising/developing the system.

    For all we know the US it self was just as interested in the results of the simulation as the British and their partners in the Typhoon program. In that case they might be willing to share certain general details that still don’t compromise the F-22 all that much. For this simulation to be realistic the US would not have to share anything more than what the Europeans will find out, at the latest, when they analyze the sensor data on the F-22 that they will collect when the Typhoon and the F-22 face each other for the first time during Maple Flag or some other exercise.

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2610085
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Savage-Rabbit:

    I’d take those ratios with a grain of salt.

    A lot depends on the capabilities of the F/A-22 as a complete weapons system, and I doubt anyone is privy to much of that information yet.

    Of course and I tried to make that point. Just getting the F-22s radar echo profile wrong, ie. how efficient you assume stealth to be, would make a huge difference. That being said the DERA was a UK-MOD entity wasn’t it? You would expect their information to be more accurate than other peoples. If the US trusts anybody with F-22 data it would be the British.

    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    I think the K.I.S.S. principle is the right one for airframes and engines as it would save alot of development time and money and hopefully result in a cheaper aircraft.

    But with the latest sensors (radars, designators, etc) and weapons (AMRAAM, JDAM, etc) whether a aircraft was designed as a fighter or bomber is pretty much irrelevant.

    For example the original Harrier was transformed a from basic ground attack machine to a world class interceptor with the addition of Blue Vixen radar and AMRAAM missiles.
    While the F-14 Tomcat interceptor became a very capable precision bomber when fitted with a designator and LGBs.

    There are and always will be air forces whose entire annual budget is what the USAF sinks into one or two F-22 Raptors and whose governments are not willing to take defense aid from some superpower. For an air force like that the arguments of the ‘The Light-weight fighter mafia’ make perfect sense because a Hawk 200, FC-1, Mako etc. is:

    1) What they can afford.
    2) All they need.
    3) Just as good or better than what the neighbor has.

    Anybody wondering why such a force is not buying F-35s by the dozen at $40 mill a piece is wasting his/her time.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 306 total)