dark light

savage-rabbit

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 306 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Secondhand F-117's for the IDF? #2569904
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    …And anyway, what need does Israel have of the capabilities the F-117 provides?

    How about decapitation attacks and hits on targets deep inside countries like Syria? Israel hasn’t been afraid to mount such attacks in the past and stealth should open up a whole new world of possibilites. It would be a lot harder to track down an F-117 or F-35 than an F-15 or F-16. To intercept and track such aircraft you would need MiG-29s or Flankers with state-of-the-art missles, radars and IRTS as well as a combination of very modern AWACS and some system that locates stealth aircraft by their airframe radiation and communications/active-sensor signature (although that would be minimal). Having 24/7 satellite surveillance of all possilbe stealthfighter bases and of their approach routes to the various targets wouldn’t hurt either. Now from what I know none of the Arab nations have unrestricted access to spy satellites, the USA deliberately keeps Egypt’s air force a step behind that of Israel in terms of technology, Syria doesn’t appear to be able to afford to keep it’s fighter fleet or air defense network modernized at the same rate as Israel can and Iran’s air defences are also getting old. Basically the Israelis should be able to strike pretty much whatever they want if they acquire state-of-the-art stealth aircraft as long as the political fallout isn’t to great.

    in reply to: Damaged Jas-39 canard? #2571585
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    …I thought that so called 4th gen planes wouldn’t have.
    They suppose to design their parts and dies in such a way to avoid shapes like that although if in doesnt’ create any practical problem then it’s ok.

    Even 4th and 5th gen fighters sometimes fail to live up to their marketing hype just like all of humanities other technological acievements. šŸ˜€

    in reply to: Pics request : Nigerian aircraft #2571611
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Cthornburg,

    Nice finds! Any idea on the camo scheme of the Nigerian MiG 15 UTI ?

    I have better pictures of this particular aircraft as well as other early NAF MiGs in print. It was either natural metal or silver. Some of the MiG-15/17 fighters and trainers that I have seen in museums and that still seem to be wearing original camouflage seem to have been painted in a protective coating containing what looks like aluminum pigment. After the embarrassingly successful rocket attacks against their airfields by Biafran MFI-9s and T-6s had cost them a few MiG’s and at least one Il-28, the NAF camouflaged it’s aircraft and the MIG-17 fighters in particular. The scheme was an all over medium or dark green color.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #8, for Pictures and Discussion. #2571617
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    The MiG-21 off course- I think they’re undergoing structural upgrade and the work was done by the VPAF. I have more pictures.

    Ok, I had heard rumors about the VPAF aircraft recieving an upgrade similar to the Indian MiG-21 ‘Bison’ program. Major MiG-21/F-7 upgrades always interest me but this sounds more like a major overhaul. Have they upgraded the electronics?

    in reply to: Anybody still operationally flying…? #2572294
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Hunter

    According to my Hawker Hunter bible India retired the last Hunters in 2000, AFAIK they were the last operator. Some of the Swiss ones are still flying but with private owners (I wish I was that rich šŸ˜€ ). Chile has some ‘nominally’ operational Canberras, whatever that means. Argentina also had a few Canberras still flying as late as the Falklands war, don’t know their status though.

    in reply to: Pakistan AF #2572512
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    kursed. That ‘Ecureuil’ profile shot is cool.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #8, for Pictures and Discussion. #2572514
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    VPAF Officials checking out upgraded MiG.

    Which subgenus of MiG would that be, what did they upgrade and who did the work?

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574172
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    ..They’d rather have 2nd or 3rd rate weapons they can fully support unaided, than 1st rate weapons dependent on an outside supplier which might leave them in the lurch. Again. Last time, it cost them hundreds of thousands of dead, destroyed cities & years of economic struggle.

    That’s a sentiment I can understand. I’d rather buy Chinese F-7G or FC-1 or Russian fighters which I could get parts and weapons for through shady suppliers if the need arose than second hand F-16s where the flow of parts and weapons would stop the moment an opinion poll showed that American public opinion about arms sales to my country had changed. While I appreciate that they strive for self sufficiencly the Iranians will still have to seek out external sources for an aircraft to replace the F-14, they can’t develop an aircraft of that caliber them selves and those F-14s are getting old. As for the Saeqeh I don’t see it picking a fight with an F-16, F-18 or a Mirage 2000, never mind a Saudi Eurofighter or an American F-22, and the Azarakhsh seems to be vaporware so far. Another issue is that the Iranians don’t have any domestic production of IR guided missiles or BVR weapons that I am aware of. I suppose they could manage to develop a domestic IR guided missle, others have done that, but a BVR weapon? All in all I fail to see how they can avoid going to Russia or China to procure at least some of their aircraft inventory and that’s assuming those two will even sell to Iran. The best Iran can hope for is to be self sufficient in terms of trainers and a light fighter of approximately the same caliber as the FC-1.

    in reply to: Can someone confirm this??? Saeqeh enters service #2574593
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Well it probably does has some form of advantage, it is scaled up from the F-5
    making it similar to the Northrop F-17 which in itself is a scaled up F-5. If we ever do get a good structural and size drawing I would love to compare it to the Northrop F-17.

    Judging from the photographs at the top of this thread the Saeqeh isn’t all that much bigger than the F-5F chase plane. I’d say it looks more like a testbed than a production prototype.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574596
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    What China really needs is a local powerplant for the FC-1/JF-17 if they want it to be successful on the export market.

    What are the domestic candidates for powering the FC-1?

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574634
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Now the WS-10A is a funny old project :rolleyes:

    The core of the CFM56 was used as the template for WS-10A development, the core of the CFM56 is based on the F101-GE-102 which was developed for the B1-B. The GE F110 fighter engine is based on the F101 making it a sister engine to the WS-10A.

    The main problem for China has been getting the metals right and the program was stalled until the Russians helped.

    What a mess šŸ˜€ But will any Russian involvement with the WS-10A affect export? I know Chinese made Flankers can’t be exported due to clauses in the license agreement.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574673
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    The major barriers against any sales push with the J-10 is the Russian engine and the focus on forfilling local PLAAF needs. For the moment the FC-1/JF-17 will be the focus of any export sales.

    Won’t that cease to be an issue when the WS-10A matures? I thought that was the projected powerplant for the main production variants of the J-10. Or is the WS-10A a license built Russian design, I thought it was a Chinese design? Either way, barring any licensing issues, I would be quite surprised if the J-10 doesn’t see at least some exports to a few select customers within the next 5 years even if they take second place to PLAAF needs.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574696
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Sticking a second vertical tail surface on an F-5 does not count as a serious upgrade. :rolleyes:

    šŸ˜€ True, the Saeqeh isn’t very impressive. But I was thinking more along the lines of the various electronics upgrades, new RWR systems, IR and Radar countermeasures, improved radar performance, integration of Chinese IR missiles and other upgrades applied to the unshaven masses of IrAF frontline F-5E fighters. Mind you, these are ‘unconfirmed reports’ from the military press, but considering the Iranians kept the F-14 flying all this time (which is a major technological achievement without manufacturer support) the reports about major F-5E upgrades seem quite plausable.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574737
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Very true, the Iranian airforce just seems to get older and older without any serious attempt at upgrading the fleet but I would be surprised if any country would be willing to sell advanced combat equipment to Iran given the current international climate.

    True but if anybody will sell Iran large numbers of fighters it is China. What would the Americans and the EU do if China sold Iran a couple of hundred J-10s? Stop trading with the Chinese? Slap an embargo on them? That would of course have serious consequences for the western corporations that have sunk hundreds of billions of dollars and Euros into building electronics factories and facilities in China so I think the western reaction would be rather impotent. But this is all speculation. What I would like to know is if those rumors of Flanker sales to Iran true? One thing is for sure, the Iranians really need to replace an awful lot of aircraft within the next 10 years or so.

    P.S. The Iranians have made some serious and mostly successful attempts at upgrading their aircraft fleet. They have apparently had the most success with the F-5.

    in reply to: What is future of J-10? #2574765
    savage-rabbit
    Participant

    Until WS-10A is deployed in large numbers, there is no point to sell J-10.

    In the near future the only real candidate for J-10 is Pakistan. Most traditional Chinese customers are lucky if they could afford FC-1. I’m not sure J-10 passes Iranian standard, they really want F-14 replacement, not another light weight fighter. Egypt is an interesting case, but even that won’t happen any time soon.

    While I will agree that the Iranian Tomcats are in need of replacement they are not they only ones and although they are important assets they definitely don’t form the backbone of the IrAF. According to Scramble the Iranians have 6-7 squadrons of F-5E/Fs and at least another 7 squadrons of F-4D/Es of various marks needing replacement plus a motley collection of Mirages, Migs and Chengdu F-7s making up another 5 or so squadrons. Now, I don’t know how accurate those figures are, but if even if the Iranians have only 4-5 squadrons of F-5s and F-4s left it still sounds like the J-10 should suit them just fine to replace these types. Especially if they can license produce the J-10.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 306 total)