dark light

pluto77189

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 533 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #353731
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Free trade is fine. When you have oppression, then it’s ugly. for
    instance, coffee growers are often paid next to nothing, while th
    econsumer in the West pays high proces for the beans. Who’s to
    blame???

    Often, people blame the “giant, western corperations”, that refuse to
    pay fair prices. Well, they’re only part to blame. In South america,
    many of the local growers dont’ sell to large companies, they sell to local
    dealers, who have a monopoly on the local sales. they force the
    growers to sell them at too-low prices. In turn , they sell to the Western
    companies at low prices.

    The companies are nto doign anything “bad” directly, but they enable the
    process by buying. If they don’t buy, they go out of buisness.

    The real problem are the corrupt dealers that price fix the cost of
    coffee. Corrupt governemnts in these countries don’t help, and the
    buying companies have NO financial reason to do anything… so the
    poor farmers lose out.

    some companies realize the problem, and are now making a killing on
    fair trade coffee. Ironically, these coffees that pay the farmers fair prices
    are considered premium, and ends up being more profitable than the
    cheap stuff! So, the market, supply and demand, etc. has made it
    MORE profitable for retailers and coffee companies in the US to deal in
    fair trade coffee. Of course, the majority of their profits come from the
    cheap stuff that takes advantade of poor growers situations, but that’ll
    change. Have faith in the market.

    in reply to: Free trade: For, against, indifferent? your thoughts #1944214
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Free trade is fine. When you have oppression, then it’s ugly. for
    instance, coffee growers are often paid next to nothing, while th
    econsumer in the West pays high proces for the beans. Who’s to
    blame???

    Often, people blame the “giant, western corperations”, that refuse to
    pay fair prices. Well, they’re only part to blame. In South america,
    many of the local growers dont’ sell to large companies, they sell to local
    dealers, who have a monopoly on the local sales. they force the
    growers to sell them at too-low prices. In turn , they sell to the Western
    companies at low prices.

    The companies are nto doign anything “bad” directly, but they enable the
    process by buying. If they don’t buy, they go out of buisness.

    The real problem are the corrupt dealers that price fix the cost of
    coffee. Corrupt governemnts in these countries don’t help, and the
    buying companies have NO financial reason to do anything… so the
    poor farmers lose out.

    some companies realize the problem, and are now making a killing on
    fair trade coffee. Ironically, these coffees that pay the farmers fair prices
    are considered premium, and ends up being more profitable than the
    cheap stuff! So, the market, supply and demand, etc. has made it
    MORE profitable for retailers and coffee companies in the US to deal in
    fair trade coffee. Of course, the majority of their profits come from the
    cheap stuff that takes advantade of poor growers situations, but that’ll
    change. Have faith in the market.

    in reply to: v-22 #2584998
    pluto77189
    Participant

    I’m telling you guys – pics and videos don’t do this thing justice. We get
    helicopters flying all over the place at my parent’s house – everythign the
    US Army and Marine Corps fly, flies over our house: From little birds,
    to Kiowas, to apache’s, Cobras Chinooks, blackhawks and whatever
    the really big ones are… and Osprey’s.

    You hear them from miles away. And you can see them for a long
    time. Loud and slow. Typical helicopter stuff.

    Ospreys, on the other hand, are more like planes. You hear a turbine
    sound for a few seconds, see the osprey for a few, and it’s gone in no
    time. Totally different story. It is not a helicopter, nor could it be
    replaced by one.

    This thing is capable of carrying out missions that we can’t do
    otherwise. It enables us to accomplish things that we can’t do right now,
    which will open up many oppurtunities in warfare. Saying that it’ll never
    save as many lives as have been lost is foolish.

    I think they should mount a large turret ( maybe 30mm) on the thing, so
    it can fire in a wide arc, off to the side, maybe like an AC-130. That
    would be useful. Fly in, drop off the guys, and take off, able to do
    covering fire while circling above.

    in reply to: F-35A production PICS!! #2585524
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Does the nose wheel rotate when it retracts? That could explain it. While more complex, that could keep the nose wheel from taking up so much internal space.

    And the f-35’s a nice looking aircraft. A lttle pudgy, but that’s what happens when you put all the stores on the inside. Think about cramming 2 missles and 2 2,000 pound bombs and fuel tanks. For what’s in it, it’s a very clean package.

    And the F-22’s about the sharpest looking plane in the sky!

    in reply to: General Discussion #355800
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Absolutly – people have come to believe hollow point bullets are these
    evil, super lethal bullets. In fact, they are safer for the average person to
    us. They tend to impart more energy on the target, reducing
    overpenetration and potential “shoot through” injuries. they are also
    more likely to fragment, further reducing collateral risks. Most of all,
    they have greater knock down power, and are more damaging to the
    human target. If you’re pointing a gun at someone, let alone pulling the
    trigger, you better have a good enough reason to do so. That being
    said, you want to kill them as effectivly as possibly, and hollow points
    are better for the job.

    Also making their rounds are “saftey slugs”, which are plastic bullets
    filled with many small shot. They will not overpenetrate, and shatter
    (almost) harmlessly if they strike a hard surface.

    Frangible ammo is also similar, though instead of a mass of small balls of
    shot, it’s a dense metal that fragments on impact.

    All of these are much safer to use in urban areas, and they are all much
    more effective at knocking down a target.

    We’ve got a different train of thought over here in the US. We dont’
    want our cops to be put into a situation where they are unable to do
    anything. Different place, different culture, different criminals.

    Hard to imagine a police officer without at least a sidearm.

    but then, over there, I bet it’s just as hard to imagine taking a trip to a
    gun show, and walking out with an AR-15, SKS, M-14, or a FAL, a
    few thousand rounds of ammo, and die, caps, and powder to reload the
    brass…

    in reply to: Should police carry guns? #1945072
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Absolutly – people have come to believe hollow point bullets are these
    evil, super lethal bullets. In fact, they are safer for the average person to
    us. They tend to impart more energy on the target, reducing
    overpenetration and potential “shoot through” injuries. they are also
    more likely to fragment, further reducing collateral risks. Most of all,
    they have greater knock down power, and are more damaging to the
    human target. If you’re pointing a gun at someone, let alone pulling the
    trigger, you better have a good enough reason to do so. That being
    said, you want to kill them as effectivly as possibly, and hollow points
    are better for the job.

    Also making their rounds are “saftey slugs”, which are plastic bullets
    filled with many small shot. They will not overpenetrate, and shatter
    (almost) harmlessly if they strike a hard surface.

    Frangible ammo is also similar, though instead of a mass of small balls of
    shot, it’s a dense metal that fragments on impact.

    All of these are much safer to use in urban areas, and they are all much
    more effective at knocking down a target.

    We’ve got a different train of thought over here in the US. We dont’
    want our cops to be put into a situation where they are unable to do
    anything. Different place, different culture, different criminals.

    Hard to imagine a police officer without at least a sidearm.

    but then, over there, I bet it’s just as hard to imagine taking a trip to a
    gun show, and walking out with an AR-15, SKS, M-14, or a FAL, a
    few thousand rounds of ammo, and die, caps, and powder to reload the
    brass…

    in reply to: General Discussion #358372
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Braveheart was one of the greatest films ever. Action, romance,
    violence, great hero, great villian… pretty ladies. Horses getting
    impaled, people who really really deserve something bad happening to
    them getting it.

    Great movie.

    And that’s it.

    It’s a movie inspired by actual historical events.

    I could see how an englishman could be predisposed to hating it, being
    that Edward I is portrayed as a real evil SOB.

    Watch the DVD, with the commentary. Mel Gibson points out a lot of
    the stuff that’s made up. Very interesting.

    in reply to: Help Settle an Arguement #1946215
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Braveheart was one of the greatest films ever. Action, romance,
    violence, great hero, great villian… pretty ladies. Horses getting
    impaled, people who really really deserve something bad happening to
    them getting it.

    Great movie.

    And that’s it.

    It’s a movie inspired by actual historical events.

    I could see how an englishman could be predisposed to hating it, being
    that Edward I is portrayed as a real evil SOB.

    Watch the DVD, with the commentary. Mel Gibson points out a lot of
    the stuff that’s made up. Very interesting.

    in reply to: Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests #2593843
    pluto77189
    Participant

    It’s all about checks and balances. Just as it is possible to make a tank impervious to anti tank rounds, it’ll be possible to make a vehcile impervious to lasers.

    Of course, a tank with enough armor to take a 120mm hit is going to be so slow, it’ll HAVE to be able to take multiple 120mm hits!

    Similarly, a vehicle equipped with a device that can reflect laser radiation (or even direct it back) is going to compromise in other areas. I can tell you mirrors don’t do much for stealthieness, and tend to make it easy to visually spot a target.

    things balance out.

    Lasers will have countermeasures, of course, but that’s all part of the game. FORCE them to develop and implement countermeasures that compromise their development and/or implementation of other technologies.

    A tank can have armor that works best against HEAT, but not so well against APFSDS. Dield a new type of weapon, make the enemy expend resources to counter it.

    Whe nlasers are fielded, other nations wil have to develop counters. Will it be complete? of course not. I see ablative coatings on sensative areas, especially in aircraft, reflective surfaces with ablative coatings around sensative areas on soft skinned vehicles, etc.

    Lasers probabyl won’t take out tanks, unless they take out optics and such.

    in reply to: War with Iran, are we there yet? :( #2594876
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Only problem is that Iran has talked of the destruction of Isreal, and any of its neighbors that assist it.

    Then, they talk about building nukes…

    This is exactly like a story one of my friend’s fathers told me. He’s a big guy (6’4″, 300+ pounds), but really mellow. He was confronted by a man, at a truck stop, who wanted to get into a fight. After my friend’s dad refused, the man exclaimed “That’s it! I’m going to my truck to get my Gun!”

    As you can imagine, he never made it.

    Iran is doing the same thing to Isreal, an dto the world, even. They’re messing with bigger, stronger nations, and then, after threatening us, are boasting that they’re going to build nukes – so they can REALLY kill us all…

    If you were confronted with a guy like that , would you just LET him get his gun?

    in reply to: General Discussion #361120
    pluto77189
    Participant

    First of all, please mind your tongue when you call 3rd world countries “hell hole”. Even though one would say that your view is understood i dont think you suggest even in a minute way that suddenly civilisations can stop reading and watching the media of any country. Although i do support the media on this issue and respect there freedom of speech and expression, as i said before the first paper to publish these was possibly not experienced enough and did not know what they risked of fueling. As i said again before, they were in there full rights to publish it but they should have seen the other end of the stick. As much as the reaction on this issue was sickening i still suggest you stop labelling the third world as a hell hole, just thank your lucky stars you were born in the “western civilisation”.

    Ah, Lighten up. You have the same sense of humor as the people rioting in the streets, threatening genocide of innocents because of a cartoon.

    “Third world hellhole” is intended as an ironic statement. If they HATE western civilization so much, why are they HERE? Obviously they see benifits of “our” culture and society, otherwise, they would have remained in their home countries. If they disparage Western civilization so much, and yet flock to it, their homeland MUST have been really bad!

    These groups rioting are pretty much scum of the earth, and obviously not representitive of even the local population. When you’re oppressed, miserable and forbidden to speak out against your opressive dictator, you seize every oppurtunity to erupt in rage and frustration, no matter who/what it’s directed at.

    It sickens me, and I hope it serves as a wake up call to people about how there are people that want to destroy our civilization. however, it’s really just a few thousand crazy idiots, running wild, and not a major revolution. What needs to be assured, is that it DOES NOt become anything bigger. then we’re in for a nasty situation.

    in reply to: Danish cartoons – attack on Islam or free speech? #1947661
    pluto77189
    Participant

    First of all, please mind your tongue when you call 3rd world countries “hell hole”. Even though one would say that your view is understood i dont think you suggest even in a minute way that suddenly civilisations can stop reading and watching the media of any country. Although i do support the media on this issue and respect there freedom of speech and expression, as i said before the first paper to publish these was possibly not experienced enough and did not know what they risked of fueling. As i said again before, they were in there full rights to publish it but they should have seen the other end of the stick. As much as the reaction on this issue was sickening i still suggest you stop labelling the third world as a hell hole, just thank your lucky stars you were born in the “western civilisation”.

    Ah, Lighten up. You have the same sense of humor as the people rioting in the streets, threatening genocide of innocents because of a cartoon.

    “Third world hellhole” is intended as an ironic statement. If they HATE western civilization so much, why are they HERE? Obviously they see benifits of “our” culture and society, otherwise, they would have remained in their home countries. If they disparage Western civilization so much, and yet flock to it, their homeland MUST have been really bad!

    These groups rioting are pretty much scum of the earth, and obviously not representitive of even the local population. When you’re oppressed, miserable and forbidden to speak out against your opressive dictator, you seize every oppurtunity to erupt in rage and frustration, no matter who/what it’s directed at.

    It sickens me, and I hope it serves as a wake up call to people about how there are people that want to destroy our civilization. however, it’s really just a few thousand crazy idiots, running wild, and not a major revolution. What needs to be assured, is that it DOES NOt become anything bigger. then we’re in for a nasty situation.

    in reply to: General Discussion #361276
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Hey, if SOME muslims have a problem with the ways of Western civilization – STAY in your 3rd world hellhole.

    If you want freedom and liberty in life, you have to, at the very least, tolerate some of the freedom and liberty of others. Drinking an occational beer, women in shorts, women in jobs, offensive cartoons, etc. Big freaking deal. I refuse to walk on eggshells just because a couple of religious nutcases (“nutters”) is threatening to estroy civilization over a freaking pen and ink drawing! Sure, we shoudl “be understanding and sensitive to their beliefs” – but this is a two way street. If we’re going to have a few muslims blowing stuff up and taking prosoners over an offensive cartoon, how can we integrate them into our society – we can’t.

    now, if you dont’ want freedom, and you dont’ want liberty…

    http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/rids/20060203/i/r1363645636.jpg?x=380&y=264&sig=zjydWIu1K148Tj_aqqakQw--

    and

    http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/rids/20060203/i/r399679231.jpg?x=363&y=345&sig=OC9w_9k8lFvGp7u2Ss4BbQ--

    Like THESE guys…

    stay away from western civilization. Don’t read our newspapers, ignore our scientific advances, and don’t come into our cities. You know, you’re perfectly welcome to take part in our civilization, as long as you understand and tolerate us. As it stands, this sort of behavior is unacceptable.

    in reply to: Danish cartoons – attack on Islam or free speech? #1947757
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Hey, if SOME muslims have a problem with the ways of Western civilization – STAY in your 3rd world hellhole.

    If you want freedom and liberty in life, you have to, at the very least, tolerate some of the freedom and liberty of others. Drinking an occational beer, women in shorts, women in jobs, offensive cartoons, etc. Big freaking deal. I refuse to walk on eggshells just because a couple of religious nutcases (“nutters”) is threatening to estroy civilization over a freaking pen and ink drawing! Sure, we shoudl “be understanding and sensitive to their beliefs” – but this is a two way street. If we’re going to have a few muslims blowing stuff up and taking prosoners over an offensive cartoon, how can we integrate them into our society – we can’t.

    now, if you dont’ want freedom, and you dont’ want liberty…

    http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/rids/20060203/i/r1363645636.jpg?x=380&y=264&sig=zjydWIu1K148Tj_aqqakQw--

    and

    http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/rids/20060203/i/r399679231.jpg?x=363&y=345&sig=OC9w_9k8lFvGp7u2Ss4BbQ--

    Like THESE guys…

    stay away from western civilization. Don’t read our newspapers, ignore our scientific advances, and don’t come into our cities. You know, you’re perfectly welcome to take part in our civilization, as long as you understand and tolerate us. As it stands, this sort of behavior is unacceptable.

    in reply to: General Discussion #362523
    pluto77189
    Participant

    All practical lasers are IR, unless they’re used for spotting. Outputting a
    visible beam is not as effecient, and results in a lower power beam.
    These 532nm green beam laseres are made from invisible beam IR
    lasers. They use a crystal to actually change the wavelength, squeezing it
    down to 532, a more visible light to us.

    The green beams we work on output less than 5mW, but average about
    3. What’s telling, is they use an IR diode that output’s over 10mW. by
    the time the wavelength is decreased, and a green beam produced, you
    lose over half the power output.

    I’m sure these crystals are more effecient, however.

    With IR lasers, you dont’ see it. The only indication of a beam is the
    pain in your retina, and the resulting damage. With a visible (green
    especially ) beam, it’s so bright, you will likely shut your eyes reflexivly
    even before the beam hits your retina.

    You can temporarily blind someone (the USAF likes the term “dazzle”)
    with a visible beam without doing any real damage – it’s just like being in
    a dark room, having dialated pupils, and someone turns the lights on –
    you’re blind for a second as your eyes are overloaded. High power IR
    lasers will just fry your retinas.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 533 total)