dark light

pluto77189

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 533 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #345967
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Hey, in LA, it probably could happen. Similar situtation in France,
    were the multiculturalist attitude seeks not assimilation, but
    independent cultural groups co-existing. In the L.A. area, you
    have a massive influx of mexican immigrants (many illegal) who do
    not wish to become American citizens. They live as if they were in
    Mexico, except taking the benifits of America, including free
    schooling. They do not become American, and fail to become
    part of society. That means they stay isolated, and poor, and it
    gives them an excuse for their situation.

    In other parts of the US, first generation natural born mexicans
    (children of immigrants) are indistinguishable from anybody else.
    They are as American as anybody. They have their family’s
    culture, but they’re no different,a nd they’re just as sucessful as
    anyobe else. NC has a huge and increasing mexican population.
    But they’re, fo rthe most part, becoming part of the culture.
    California’s policies on illegal immigrants will eventually lead to a
    big blowup. It’s only a matter of time.

    It’s these isolated groups of people that have no desire to become
    part of, and contribute to, American culture, that are problems.

    I could see something like that happen in some of those areas. It
    wold be interesting to see how it’s handled. Arnold would put his
    foot down, I believe, more quickly than Jacques did.

    in reply to: Riots in France #1930759
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Hey, in LA, it probably could happen. Similar situtation in France,
    were the multiculturalist attitude seeks not assimilation, but
    independent cultural groups co-existing. In the L.A. area, you
    have a massive influx of mexican immigrants (many illegal) who do
    not wish to become American citizens. They live as if they were in
    Mexico, except taking the benifits of America, including free
    schooling. They do not become American, and fail to become
    part of society. That means they stay isolated, and poor, and it
    gives them an excuse for their situation.

    In other parts of the US, first generation natural born mexicans
    (children of immigrants) are indistinguishable from anybody else.
    They are as American as anybody. They have their family’s
    culture, but they’re no different,a nd they’re just as sucessful as
    anyobe else. NC has a huge and increasing mexican population.
    But they’re, fo rthe most part, becoming part of the culture.
    California’s policies on illegal immigrants will eventually lead to a
    big blowup. It’s only a matter of time.

    It’s these isolated groups of people that have no desire to become
    part of, and contribute to, American culture, that are problems.

    I could see something like that happen in some of those areas. It
    wold be interesting to see how it’s handled. Arnold would put his
    foot down, I believe, more quickly than Jacques did.

    in reply to: General Discussion #346742
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Millionaires going for lions? I don’t think so. A co worker of
    mine has gone to Africa a few times, and he makes less than
    $40,000. He just saved up. Got a leopard, wart hog and a
    buffalo. Trophy hunting. Not for me, personally, but I can see the
    thrill in it. It just isn’t something I’d do, I don’t think I’d enjoy
    killing a predator unless it was trying to kill me o rsomeone else.
    THEN I’d put it on a wall… I just wouldn’t go looking for one for
    that purpose.

    Besides, how do you think these poor african countries maintain
    their game lands and prevent poachers from killing endangered
    animals – hunting permits and safaris. Kill a few animals here,
    save hundreds there.

    in reply to: My first deer #1931039
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Millionaires going for lions? I don’t think so. A co worker of
    mine has gone to Africa a few times, and he makes less than
    $40,000. He just saved up. Got a leopard, wart hog and a
    buffalo. Trophy hunting. Not for me, personally, but I can see the
    thrill in it. It just isn’t something I’d do, I don’t think I’d enjoy
    killing a predator unless it was trying to kill me o rsomeone else.
    THEN I’d put it on a wall… I just wouldn’t go looking for one for
    that purpose.

    Besides, how do you think these poor african countries maintain
    their game lands and prevent poachers from killing endangered
    animals – hunting permits and safaris. Kill a few animals here,
    save hundreds there.

    in reply to: General Discussion #347097
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Australia is fine – I like their accents.
    I do not like elitst sounding english accents – like the one Madonna
    has ended up with. Everyday english-citizen accents are fine.

    NJ accents (like the one I have when I let myself go) are abarsive,
    confrontational, and not pleasent. Some areas are really bad.
    Where I grew up, people there now speak wiht a combined
    NY/NJ Italian/ spanish/puerto rico/ inner city accent. It’s pretty
    bad.

    In fact, the Sopranos takes place where I grew up. The nudie
    bar, Bada-bing, is Satin dolls, a go-go bar 10 minutes from my
    house. My best friend installed the plumbing there.
    People are killed on the show at places I used to go all the time.
    I’d like to say th eaccents are over the top, and th ebehavior is
    fake… but every time I go back I’m reminded that it’s not.

    My accent throws people off down here in the South. I’m very
    loud, with a heavy, mean sounding NJ mobster accent – I’m
    Sicilian so waddaya ‘spect? People see me, a big, mean-looking
    guy with a heavy mobster accent and they think I’m mean.

    in reply to: The least desired country to live in… #1931183
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Australia is fine – I like their accents.
    I do not like elitst sounding english accents – like the one Madonna
    has ended up with. Everyday english-citizen accents are fine.

    NJ accents (like the one I have when I let myself go) are abarsive,
    confrontational, and not pleasent. Some areas are really bad.
    Where I grew up, people there now speak wiht a combined
    NY/NJ Italian/ spanish/puerto rico/ inner city accent. It’s pretty
    bad.

    In fact, the Sopranos takes place where I grew up. The nudie
    bar, Bada-bing, is Satin dolls, a go-go bar 10 minutes from my
    house. My best friend installed the plumbing there.
    People are killed on the show at places I used to go all the time.
    I’d like to say th eaccents are over the top, and th ebehavior is
    fake… but every time I go back I’m reminded that it’s not.

    My accent throws people off down here in the South. I’m very
    loud, with a heavy, mean sounding NJ mobster accent – I’m
    Sicilian so waddaya ‘spect? People see me, a big, mean-looking
    guy with a heavy mobster accent and they think I’m mean.

    in reply to: General Discussion #347239
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Varminting is purely done for sport, for fun, as a test of skill. It’s
    not at all like hunting for deer, bear or turkey.

    It’s cruel, and the only skills practiced in it coudl be done with
    non-living targets. For me, there’s not much to be gained from it.
    Any fun in killing varmits woudl be outweighed by the shear
    meanness of killing for fun only.

    Here’s where you are wrong.

    Most hunter’s have respect for the animals they hunt. They use
    what they kill, and hunt for more than just the killing part.

    Using varmint hunting as a justification for opposing deer hunting is
    senseless – they’re different.

    People go and hunt deer for the experience, the challenge, the thrill
    and the meat.

    Other people go and shoot praire dogs to watch them explode
    into a cloud of blood and fur.

    We’re talking about two entirely different mindsets here.

    And humans aren’t the only animals that kill for fun. I’ve seen sea
    lions, killer whales and dolphins do it. Cats will do it too – though
    they are domesticated.

    There is a distinction between hunting and killing an animal for the
    sake of hunting it and eating it, and simply killing an animal to kill it.

    I know of a few people that will go into a field andblast doves out
    of the air all day, and just dump them into a ditch when they’re
    done. I think that’s stupid, senseless cruelty, just like you do.

    in reply to: My first deer #1931213
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Varminting is purely done for sport, for fun, as a test of skill. It’s
    not at all like hunting for deer, bear or turkey.

    It’s cruel, and the only skills practiced in it coudl be done with
    non-living targets. For me, there’s not much to be gained from it.
    Any fun in killing varmits woudl be outweighed by the shear
    meanness of killing for fun only.

    Here’s where you are wrong.

    Most hunter’s have respect for the animals they hunt. They use
    what they kill, and hunt for more than just the killing part.

    Using varmint hunting as a justification for opposing deer hunting is
    senseless – they’re different.

    People go and hunt deer for the experience, the challenge, the thrill
    and the meat.

    Other people go and shoot praire dogs to watch them explode
    into a cloud of blood and fur.

    We’re talking about two entirely different mindsets here.

    And humans aren’t the only animals that kill for fun. I’ve seen sea
    lions, killer whales and dolphins do it. Cats will do it too – though
    they are domesticated.

    There is a distinction between hunting and killing an animal for the
    sake of hunting it and eating it, and simply killing an animal to kill it.

    I know of a few people that will go into a field andblast doves out
    of the air all day, and just dump them into a ditch when they’re
    done. I think that’s stupid, senseless cruelty, just like you do.

    in reply to: General Discussion #347254
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Southern accents are far more pleasant than northern ones… I’m
    from NJ, and I cringe when I go back there. I can’t believe that I
    actually talk like that… You watch a mob show based in NY/Nj
    and think the way they talk is exaggerated, think again.

    It’s not that bad, actually. You want a bad accent, try a new
    england accent. California accents can be really annoying as
    well.

    in reply to: The least desired country to live in… #1931231
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Southern accents are far more pleasant than northern ones… I’m
    from NJ, and I cringe when I go back there. I can’t believe that I
    actually talk like that… You watch a mob show based in NY/Nj
    and think the way they talk is exaggerated, think again.

    It’s not that bad, actually. You want a bad accent, try a new
    england accent. California accents can be really annoying as
    well.

    in reply to: General Discussion #347408
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Too often, people think what they see in the news or on vacation
    as being indicative of what it’s like to live somewhere.

    I actually have a friend who is a Sudanese muslim. He loves his
    country, and would someday like to return. He’s described a lot
    of really beautiful things about it. And some very ugly things.
    Even though he’s a muslim, he faces racisim by the arabs, because
    he is African. he’s a typical, light skinned north african – many
    americans wouldn’t even call him black. The Arabs made his life
    miserable.

    I wouldn’t want to live in Florida. Too low to the ground, too
    many hurricanes. It’s overrated, even by americans. Sure, you’re
    an hour from eithe rthe gulf coast or the atlantic, have tropical
    weather year round, disneyworld, universal studios, and sea world
    – and you get to see every space shuttle launch.
    What good is it if your home is subject to destruction every year
    from June to November?

    in reply to: The least desired country to live in… #1931284
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Too often, people think what they see in the news or on vacation
    as being indicative of what it’s like to live somewhere.

    I actually have a friend who is a Sudanese muslim. He loves his
    country, and would someday like to return. He’s described a lot
    of really beautiful things about it. And some very ugly things.
    Even though he’s a muslim, he faces racisim by the arabs, because
    he is African. he’s a typical, light skinned north african – many
    americans wouldn’t even call him black. The Arabs made his life
    miserable.

    I wouldn’t want to live in Florida. Too low to the ground, too
    many hurricanes. It’s overrated, even by americans. Sure, you’re
    an hour from eithe rthe gulf coast or the atlantic, have tropical
    weather year round, disneyworld, universal studios, and sea world
    – and you get to see every space shuttle launch.
    What good is it if your home is subject to destruction every year
    from June to November?

    in reply to: General Discussion #347412
    pluto77189
    Participant

    There were numerous things we all once had to do for ourselves,
    but surely mankind has only advanced through the division of
    labour, by each of us specialising in different things and sharing the
    fruits of our labours.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his
    needs.”

    So let other people do that work for you, because you don’t “have
    to”? Just because something isn’t necessary isn’t a reason not to
    do it. If I enjoy hunting and killing and eating an animal, it’s my
    right to do it. Just because I can pay someone else to do it for
    me, absolvign myself of work that is “beneath me’, doesn’t mean
    I’m obligated to do it. Meat isn’t a necessary evil – why is it
    people get so guilty about nature.

    Predators and prey = nature
    we’re predators, we kill and eat – that’s natural. No guilt, not evil,
    just the natural way of things. You want to feel bad for the
    animals, fine.

    Do not become so enamoured with yourself that you consider
    yourself to be apart from nature, and all it’s bloodshed and
    suffering. Humans are not above nature, nor are we separate from
    it. Every thing we do impacts nature just as much as any other
    animal.

    Nature does not garuntee a pain free living. A starving deer feels
    pain, as does one that is shot through the heart, or ripped apart by
    wolves. Unless you shoot them right in the head ( actually, many
    hunters do this when they’re just going for meat), they’re going to
    suffer somewhat.

    Varminting is a sport that’s derived from the necessary killing of
    pests. Groundhogs and prarie dogs are agricultural pests, and
    destroy crops and cropland. Now, it’ s just a thing to do for fun.
    check out http://www.explodinggroundhog.com for details. I wouldn’t,
    though…

    in reply to: My first deer #1931293
    pluto77189
    Participant

    There were numerous things we all once had to do for ourselves,
    but surely mankind has only advanced through the division of
    labour, by each of us specialising in different things and sharing the
    fruits of our labours.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his
    needs.”

    So let other people do that work for you, because you don’t “have
    to”? Just because something isn’t necessary isn’t a reason not to
    do it. If I enjoy hunting and killing and eating an animal, it’s my
    right to do it. Just because I can pay someone else to do it for
    me, absolvign myself of work that is “beneath me’, doesn’t mean
    I’m obligated to do it. Meat isn’t a necessary evil – why is it
    people get so guilty about nature.

    Predators and prey = nature
    we’re predators, we kill and eat – that’s natural. No guilt, not evil,
    just the natural way of things. You want to feel bad for the
    animals, fine.

    Do not become so enamoured with yourself that you consider
    yourself to be apart from nature, and all it’s bloodshed and
    suffering. Humans are not above nature, nor are we separate from
    it. Every thing we do impacts nature just as much as any other
    animal.

    Nature does not garuntee a pain free living. A starving deer feels
    pain, as does one that is shot through the heart, or ripped apart by
    wolves. Unless you shoot them right in the head ( actually, many
    hunters do this when they’re just going for meat), they’re going to
    suffer somewhat.

    Varminting is a sport that’s derived from the necessary killing of
    pests. Groundhogs and prarie dogs are agricultural pests, and
    destroy crops and cropland. Now, it’ s just a thing to do for fun.
    check out http://www.explodinggroundhog.com for details. I wouldn’t,
    though…

    in reply to: General Discussion #347910
    pluto77189
    Participant

    Hunters contribute more to protecting nature than
    environmentalists. Hunters pay qite a bit for their liscenses. In
    NC, it’s $40 for a sportsmen’s liscense, which let’s me go for deer,
    turkey, bear, some fowl, and fish, includign trout. Migratory
    waterfowl and doves are a little extra. NC is one of the cheapest
    states too.

    It’s only contradictory if you don’t have an understanging of nature,
    the environment and biological systems. Killing a deer, a bear or
    anyhting else for that matter does not harm nature. As long as
    hunting is regulated, it’s not harmful. In most cases, it’s more than
    beneficial, it’s a crucial part of nature’s balance. The money
    collected goes to enforcing regulations and sustainable forestry
    practices. In the end, it helps protect the environment.

    What’s contradictory is when environmentalists collect money to
    save the forest, and use it to prohibit forestry operations in an
    attempt at “preserving” the forest. In time, this leads to massive
    forest fires and a truely devastating incident.

    Managed forestry and selective harvesting of trees simply replaces
    the natural regenerative process of limited burning. Burnign is
    somewhat incompatible with civilization, so in many cases, forestry
    is the only alternative.

    An individual deer isn’t nature, it’s a component in nature. Just as
    the food the deer eats, the trees, the rivers and streams – and the
    things that help balance it all out – predators, fire, drought, and
    disease. All are important, necesaary aspects of a healthy,
    sustainable ecosystem. Problem is, predators are predators to us
    as well as deer. Being the top predators, we’ve pushed out out
    competition and rivals – it’s a prudent thing to do. Nobody wants
    to run the risk of being torn apart by wolves, or ambushed by a
    cougar every time they venture in the woods. As we supplant
    these other predators, we must also replace them. IF they ar ento
    there to fil their niche, we must do so, or else the whole system
    becomes unbalanced. In Eastern NC, deer are all over the place.
    Contrary to what’s popularly believed, humans don’t just hunt the
    healthy, big bucks. Sure, they’r esought after,bu ut hunting limits in
    overpopulated areas are slanted heavily in favor of killing does.
    Here, you can’t kill more than 2 bucks, but you can kill as many as
    5 does a season, per person. In th emountains, you can only kill
    does on the very last day of the season, and only one at that.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 533 total)