dark light

Alex Crawford

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 314 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hawker Nimrod #1389305
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi Flood,

    Many thanks. I have a photo of S1577 and was wondering about its history. I’m not sure if this aircraft went to Demark as well as a pattern aircraft for their Nimrods. I may be confusing this with another ‘S’ series Nimrod.

    Are there many Nimrods in the ‘S’ series? I don’t want to buy the book just for the Nimrod info.

    Cheers,

    Alex

    in reply to: for anyone who takes digital pics… #1390966
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi Peter,

    You can probably pick up a reasonable printer for about £100-£150. Kodak do their own printers complete with docking station for the camera.

    If you are going to get one I would recommend you get one that does the thermal printing rather than relying on actual ink cartridges. This will give you actual photo quality prints. I don’t know any models off hand but a look through the well known ‘PC store’ should give you a few ideas. I know some of the thermal kits are about £20 and only do about 20 images so it’s not cheap. Ink cartridges just don’t give the same quality.

    One other option is to try your local photo shop. I put 50 of my digital images on CD and get them ‘developed’ as standard 6×4 prints for a fiver. This works out much cheaper than printing them myself.

    Alex

    in reply to: Mosquito Mk XVIII Tse-tse #1394077
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi Guys,

    Thanks for the details already.

    Steve,

    I would be interested in details of the attacks he carried out, especially those carried out from September ’43 to December ’43. My info for this period is somewhat lacking. Also does it contain serial/code letters? I am still trying to track down all the serials to their individual code letters.

    Email address is acrawfordATblueyonder.co uk substitute the AT for the usual.

    Eddie,

    Thanks, I’ve seen that photo, it has AT-28 on the nose and no machine guns. I guessed it may have been the Tse-tse that went to the US. I’m trying to get hold of some photos of this through the US Navy archives, but no luck so far.

    Radar, James

    I’ve tried BAe before but may try again. I had a contact name but I’ve misplaced it. My filing system is not all that great.

    Alex

    in reply to: Caption competition #1402659
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    We’ll never get all those spare tyres in here!

    in reply to: Favourite biplane #1413244
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi,

    First off, it’s great to have the forum back. It’s been sorely missed by all.

    Mike J,

    Nice photos of the Duxford Glad. I must get down there again next year. It’s really coming along now. I believe it’s going to be painted in pre war colours, not sure about which Squadron though.

    Here some pics of the one that was pulled out of Lake Lesjaskog in Norway. It now resides at Hendon.

    in reply to: Favourite biplane #1414695
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Excellent photos. I’ve been to Shuttleworth a couple of times but not for a display. Must try.

    in reply to: Favourite biplane #1414745
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Yes, I must admit the Staggerwing does have a sleek modern look about it.

    in reply to: Airshows are crackin #1414875
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    a nice tight formation………..

    in reply to: Gladiator serial #1417100
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi,

    I have had a closer look at the 247 Sqn Glad HP-B. The serial is N2308 not N2306, typo error on the caption. So I think it rules that out for a 16 Sqn machine.

    Alex

    in reply to: Hendons Hart Trainer #1417111
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    I would imagine so, can you hang a prop without and engine?

    Alex

    in reply to: Hendons Hart Trainer #1417432
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi,

    The notice states its a IB.

    Alex

    in reply to: Hendons Hart Trainer #1417473
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi,

    I’ll post some of their other Hart later today.

    By the way, these were all taken on a pretty bog standard digital camera. An Olypmus C-960 Zoom 1.3Megapix, although at the time of purchase it was a top of the range camera. But nothing stays that way for long.

    Alex

    in reply to: Gladiator serial #1417644
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi Geoff,

    From what I have read 16 Sqn had at least one Gladiator on strength. This was N2306 UG-R (Flying Units of the RAF, Alan Lake). In the old RAF Serials N1000-N9999 it does not have a fate for N2306. It was simply with 605/615 squadrons.

    Tom Spencer’s Gladiator Warpaint also mentions that 16 Sqn had a Gladiator on strength, possible an ex-615 Squadron machine that was evacuated from France. In the book there are two photos of N2306 one without codes and the other showing it wearing the markings of 247 Sqn. The caption of the uncoded photo states:

    ‘Gladiator MkII N2306 was a survivor. Having served in France with 615 Sqn it was evacuated and joined 16 Sqn as shown here, later coded UG-R. Later still served with 239 Sqn before being used as a personal hack’

    The photo showing it in 247 Sqn markings states;

    ‘The only Gladiator squadron with RAF Fighter Command during the Battle of Britain was 247 Sqn to which N2306:HP-B belonged in August 1940.’ The only part of the code you can really make out is the letter ‘B’.

    Francis Masons book states that N2306 was flown back to Lympne by Fly Off Aitken of 16 Sqn, this unit taking possession of the Gladiator on reserve strength with the codes UG-R. Mason also states that another Gladiator was taken over by 16 Sqn and was coded UG-D. The aircraft was possibly N2304. He then goes on to say that these two aircraft went on to 239 Sqn in September 1940. N2306 remained uncoded and N2304 decame HB-G.

    I wonder if the photo of N2306:HP-B is actually N2306:HB-B of 239 Sqn.

    Does this get confusing or what?

    Okay this still does not answer my original question. Does anyone have the newer version of the RAF serials L1000-N9999 and could look these two aircraft up for me?

    Does anyone have better photos of N2304 and N2306?

    The Hectors that dropped supplies at Calais were from 613 Sqn. I have a number photos of 613 Hectors and Lysanders for an article I’m working on.

    Alex

    in reply to: Tse-tse question #1418295
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi Neilly,

    Here is what I have for the 10 March 1944.

    During the course of the Second World War a number of German and Japanese submarines carried vital war materials and exchanged information on weapons, engines and aircraft designs. One such Japanese submarine was I-29, which left Singapore for occupied France on 16 December 1943. The submarine, code named Matsu (Pine), was the fourth Japanese submarine to undertake this type of mission. She carried on board 16 passengers, which consisted of Naval officers, Engineers and specialists.

    Allied code breakers had deciphered a signal that indicated I-29s final destination. Plans were put in motion to intercept the submarine in the Bay of Biscay. On 13 February I-29 was being refuelled from U-488, a ‘Milch Cow’, when she was spotted by an aircraft. She escaped any damage. While off Cape Finisterre I-29 was caught on the surface at night by an aircraft carrying a Leigh Light. Again the submarine escaped undamaged. I-29 finally arrived at the Bay of Biscay on 9 March.

    Allied Intelligence was informed of the submarines presence in the Bay. Two Tse-tse, HX904/E (Sqn Ldr Philips/Fly Off Thomson) and MM425/L (Fly Off Turner/Fly Off Curtis) with an escort of four FB VIs (HJ828/R, HP922/U, MM431/Z and LR349/Y) from 248 Squadron set out to attack the submarine on the 10th. With a cloud base of 1,500ft and visibility at 8-10 miles the vessel was finally spotted off Cape Penas just before 0920hrs with an escort of two German destroyers, Z-23 and ZH-1, and two torpedo boats, T-27 and T-29. Overhead there were eight Ju88C-6s from III/ZG 1 circling the ships down below. The Mosquitoes initially approached from the North before circling around to the west and then further still to come in from out of the sun. The four FB VIs went for the Junkers in an attempt to draw them off the Tse-tses. Flt Sgt Tongue, LR349/Y, claimed one of the Junkers shot down and Fly Off Forest claimed hits on another, as did Flt Lt Jeffreys.

    Of his attack on the Junkers Flt Sgt Tongue wrote:

    ‘ As we dived through the clouds I was in line astern of Fly Off Forrest Z/248. Three Ju88’s were in line astern ahead of us at about 1500ft and as we came in the last one broke off to port and turned to make cloud cover. Fly Off Forrest turned after it and I followed the other two which had started a climbing turn to starboard, still holding formation. At between 400 and 500 yards range and angle off 30 degrees I fired a two second burst and the second e/a and although no hits were observed it swung to port and turned back to starboard almost immediately. Again I fired a two second burst and saw hits on the port engine and the port side of the cockpit. Smoke began to stream from the engine and the e/a started to lose height and tried to turn into the convoy, either for covering fire or with the intention of ditching. Following him down we experienced erratic return fire from the position in the rear of the cockpit. A final burst brought a sheet of flame from the starboard engine of the e/a and another larger one from where the trailing edge of the port wing joined the fuselage. The e/a broke up and disappeared in the water leaving only a column of black smoke. No survivors or wreckage were seen on the surface.’

    Despite the flak coming up from the escorts the Tse-tse dived in to attack. Sqn Ldr Philips carried out four separate attacks and Fly Off Turner made two. A total of six hits were claimed on the submarine, although reports seem to indicate that the submarine suffered no actual damage. It would appear that a destroyer was also damaged during the attack as well. Sqn Ldr Phillips tangled with one of the Ju88s and claimed to have hit it after firing four shells from his Molins gun. The port engine was reportedly knocked out of the Junkers. According to German records 7/ZG 1 lost one Ju88 at 0924hrs. Sqn Ldr Phillips’ aircraft, HX904/E, suffered category ‘B’ damage during this mission. A repair team from De Havillands arrived on the 14th to carry out the repair and the Mosquito was back in service by the 15th.

    Later in the day at approximately 1700hrs a further wave of ten aircraft attacked the I-29 and her escorts. Again the submarine would appeared to have escaped any damage. Ju88s from ZG 1 were in the air again providing an air umbrella for the Japanese submarine. This time they lost one of their number, Ju88C-6 Wrk Nr 750965 2N+AA of Stab/ZG 1 to a 157 Squadron Mosquito.

    The I-29 arrived safely at Lorient. For the journey home to Japan she was loaded with a HWK 509A-1 rocket motor, as used on the Me163 Comet, plus a Jumo 004B engine, as used on the Me262. She also carried plans for Isotta-Fraschini torpedo boat engine, a V-1 ‘Buzz bomb’ fuselage, TMC acoustic mines, bauxite and reportedly mercury-radium amalgam. During the journey home the American submarine USS Sawfish torpedoed and sank the I-29 on 26th July 1944.

    The info on 248 comes from the squadron ORB, info on I-29 and German formations from other sources. Ju88 losses from Chris Goss.

    From speaking to A H Hilliard the Tse-tse did not carry squadron codes only individual letters.

    As always I am always on the look out for further info on Tse-tse operations.

    Alex

    in reply to: Tse-tse question #1419557
    Alex Crawford
    Participant

    Hi Neilly,

    Can you elaborate a little on this? I have the ORB for 248 Sqn From Jan ’44 onwards. Was this in 1943? I assume it was a different Rose?

    Alex

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 314 total)