I do however object to it going inside if it means that the likes of the Viscount etc at Brooklands still struggle to get a roof over their heads if deference to a reproduction.

What a sad and pathetic point of view from somone who clearly has no understanding of what makes a particular aircraft historic.

The Vimy may well be new(ish) build but its done more in its class than all of the aircraft at Brooklands have. It fully deserves to be undercover at the expense of aircraft that have examples preserved elsewhere. Especially considering its construction does not lend itself well to keeping it outside.

It is no mere reproduction and to think so show a total lack of understanding of historic aviation and what makes an aircraft worthy of preservation.

same as “Starbucks” for refusing to send coffee etc to the troops.

Which was completely false and a hoax, but dont let the facts get in the way of your anger.

Snopes.com

People, who need pictures of mutilated bodies in order to understand the horror of war, are the same kind of people who keep starting them. No amount of gore will ever educate them.

You have clearly never bothered to either try or understand how.

There is a big difference between publishing pictures of anonymous battle casualties and publishing pictures of a named individual, who might still have living relatives. I doubt anyone here would like to see their deceased relatives when visiting an online forum, or opening a book. It’s not the fact that Sgt Lazarev is dead, it’s that he is Sgt Lazarev.

So it only matters when you know their names then?

Evertime I look at a picture of a dead soldier on the Ypres Salient I think of a relative who died there but whose body was never found.

It really doesnt matter, a dead person is a dead person, someones son, brother, father. If you censor this then you have to censor all of them.