dark light

J-20

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 136 through 146 (of 146 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • J-20
    Participant

    How about the twin factors of….
    1 affordability, how rich is my country?
    2 Political alignment, if my country happens to be a crazy revolutionary islamist nation, what are my chances of getting the latest aircraft from western nations?

    hello beautiful.

    1 and 2. You decide! you decide what kind of country and situation you’re in!
    you just have to follow the aircraft rule. (anything that actually entered in service by 1989. must be an actual operational plane. no prototypes and experimental ac)

    J-20
    Participant

    thanks for the PDF document on the F-15. Read through the first half and skimmed the rest. but it is pretty much as you summarized.

    F/A-18.. good combat record, safety.. its only limitations imho, is the sweep of its wing (understandable due to carrier operations) but would have preferred a deeper sweep.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2169178
    J-20
    Participant

    yep I Agree with our tasty Fresh Burger Whopper
    its really all about picking which export is the lesser evil for you

    US – tight controls over spares/upgrades/stock
    French – more flexible but will charge you twice as much as the Americans. Unless your enemy has more money
    Swedes/Germans – you must follow their human rights philosophies or no spares
    Russians – no spares to give, no cares to give
    Chinese – spares made in China

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2169892
    J-20
    Participant

    A Swedish aviation expert compares the F-35 and Gripen E:

    https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a…perplanet-f35a

    (Use Google translate or another automatic translator if your Swedish is rusty )

    yup. link is unreadable.

    J-20
    Participant

    im glad a lot of guys caught a few inappropriate aircraft and understood the time frame

    1980s F-16 were a bit more limited, no F-15E yet (on that subject how well suited were the earlier eagles towards A2G?)
    Also yes, its 1989 and downwards.. 60s and 70s aircraft are still valid, and perhaps a better choice because they were more mature at this stage.
    M4K never entered service. doesn’t count.
    F-14 was exported.. in the 70s.

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2169930
    J-20
    Participant

    If they ever do seriously consider the F-35.. it should really be the B. it’s the only viable mig-29 replacement to take off from their baby carriers.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2171403
    J-20
    Participant

    no fire
    but yes, rushed into service

    j-20 stronk!

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2171407
    J-20
    Participant

    Hi Kovy,

    have you done any new awesome photoshops lately?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2171441
    J-20
    Participant

    Izumo information

    Flight deck is 243m
    allowing for 5 simultaneous helicopter operations

    Elevators
    1 – 14m x 15m
    2 – 20m x 13m

    Max speed 30kts

    Hangar
    space for 14 helicopters
    area is twice that of Hyuga class

    via royal institute of naval architect

    hangar space sounds about similar to the Gorshkov (pre conversion)

    in reply to: NH90, yay or nay? #2171533
    J-20
    Participant

    its like every month, we hear new stories of customers being frustrated with their NH-90 purchase.

    looks like Sweden will have to pull the super pumas they retired early, back into service!

    and to the top comment, I agree, the germans (if not collaborating) make nice things.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2171536
    J-20
    Participant

    hello sexy people.

    there do exist renders of both with a flight deck and a ski jump

    the flight deck one seems improbable though

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuP4xbJVMAETeyi.jpg

Viewing 11 posts - 136 through 146 (of 146 total)