dark light

Creaking Door

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 9,421 through 9,435 (of 12,419 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The untold Battle of Britain #1098362
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    “…at the end of the war the Allies handed control of Poland to the Communists…”

    Not sure the Allies ‘handed’ anything to the Communists! :rolleyes: In warfare possession is ten tenths of the law!

    in reply to: More Fiona Banner Art Stuff… #1098374
    Creaking Door
    Participant
    in reply to: The untold Battle of Britain #1098629
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I am! 😮 Thank goodness for ‘Channel 4+1’! 🙂

    in reply to: DC3 Piston rings #1098632
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I have a DC3 piston…

    Is it an R-1820 or (more likely) an R-1830 piston and where did you get it?

    You could try the US eBay site, R-1830 parts come up regularly and rings shouldn’t be too expensive to ship.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/25ea-PRATT-WHITNEY-R1830-PISTON-RINGS-19667-N-O-S-/370376702289?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Motors_Aviation_Parts_Gear&hash=item563c2bf951

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/25ea-PRATT-WHITNEY-R1830-COPM-RINGS-31406-N-O-S-/320305706994?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Motors_Aviation_Parts_Gear&hash=item4a93b537f2

    This may even fit your piston?

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/PRATT-WHITNEY-R2800-LINK-ROD-CORSAIR-P-47-C-46-ETC-/370385952754?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Motors_Aviation_Parts_Gear&hash=item563cb91ff2

    The reason I ask about where you got the piston is that you’d need to be sure you had the right piston before you spent a lot of money on rings that didn’t fit! 🙂

    in reply to: Control Column From Tom Gleave's Hurricane P3115 #1098784
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Hi Kiwinz, sorry it wasn’t good news about your control column but welcome to the forum anyway.

    I know absolutely nothing about control columns but something that you said about the provenance of yours has got me thinking:

    …passed on a Sotheby’s purchase record of it to the US militaria dealer dating back to the 1950’s. Did people start doing what has been alleged here way back then?

    Do you have the Sotheby’s purchase record? Because what got me thinking was that the purchase record probably referred to a control column (which could well have been from Hurricane P3115) but apparently now your control column isn’t from Hurricane P3115. What would prevent somebody making a switch, post-Sotheby’s, because being a mass-produced item there were hundreds of identical control columns so how was this one actually identified on the purchase record?

    This also raises another issue with provenance; how do Sotheby’s know the control column was from Hurricane P3115, or are they just repeating what the vendor told them?

    Until I acquired it, the grip has been on the original stand for at least half a century.

    But not with the ‘original’ brass plaque? It looks to me as if it has been made by a modern cutter, I would have thought that in 1960 the text would have been punched (but I could be wrong)…..of course a replacement plaque could (quite innocently) have been fitted.

    Lastly, I hope you have some success with the Militaria Dealer’s money back guarantee.

    in reply to: More Fiona Banner Art Stuff… #1099596
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    …pic of the polished Jag is here: http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=38950

    Great link; I think I like it even more from that photograph…..oh to have a ‘regular’ Jaguar displayed in that space!

    It doesn’t appear to be suspended but surely must be considerably lightened internally.

    in reply to: Glastonbury aircraft bits #1099946
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I reckon the double engine pod is ex-VC10…

    That was my other thought too but I had a look at the Bruntingthorpe VC10 scrapping thread and couldn’t see any obvious similarity.

    in reply to: Glastonbury aircraft bits #1100384
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    The engine looks like a helicopter powerplant. Don’t recognise the type but could be Russian.

    Agree helicopter; could it be Alvis Leonides?

    Twin engines Sea Vixen?

    in reply to: More Fiona Banner Art Stuff… #1100660
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    I quite like the look of the Jaguar…..but I’m surprised the fin didn’t come off (or is it suspended).

    The Harrier would have looked better as a shark…..always thought Harriers looked like sharks!

    Great display hall…

    …how about getting the RAFM Stuka in there next? :diablo:

    in reply to: Strange Boulton Paul Defiant anecdote #1101223
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    Interestingly not JUST if he moved the joystick –

    http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i234/phylo_roadking/defiantpage11.jpg

    So to energise electric motor (and hydraulic pump) the gunner would have to operate two distinct switches, the ‘master switch’ and the ‘armature switch’ (by gripping the joystick)?

    There do seem to be an inordinate number of safety features on this turret, but maybe not so surprising if the gunner has got wriggle himself around inside without inadvertently traversing the turret.

    in reply to: Strange Boulton Paul Defiant anecdote #1101265
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    But surely the gunner would switch the ‘pilot-off-gunner’ selector switch well before looking down and to the right, away from his gunsight, would have been an issue.

    Also aren’t these stills from an instructional film? There would have to be concessions for positioning the camera (and fuses could have been pulled to prevent the cameraman falling off the turret if the gunner moved his joystick) so these actions probably don’t reflect exact operational use.

    Where can I see these films?

    in reply to: Strange Boulton Paul Defiant anecdote #1101293
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    In BOTH pics you can see that the switch is “on”, turned to the “gunner” position…

    AND THE LAMP IS *NOT* LIT!

    Aren’t you confusing the bulb lighting for the ‘master switch’ for the turret motor (and hydraulic power) and the ‘pilot-off-gunner’ selector switch of the firing circuit?

    http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i234/phylo_roadking/defiantpage8.jpg

    The bulb was to warn the gunner that the turret would turn if he moved the joystick…..the gunner can see which way the ‘pilot-off-gunner’ selector is switched just by looking at it.

    in reply to: Strange Boulton Paul Defiant anecdote #1101394
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    …is it that impossible for Sgt Loftig to have rested his arms up on the cockpit sills???

    I’ll concede that it looks possible…

    …but as I said earlier I simply don’t have the knowledge to argue about the position of the pilot’s arms or whether it would be possible for the pilot to inadvertently press his firing button. So for the sake of my argument I’ve assumed that both those are possible, difficult, but not impossible.

    Those issues aside I’m still far from convinced that this anecdote is anything other than a ‘line-shoot’. 🙂

    in reply to: Strange Boulton Paul Defiant anecdote #1101403
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    If that bulb had popped…then the gunner wouldn’t have that little glowing reminder out of the corner of his eye that the master switch was still “on” and energised…whether at “pilot” OR “gunner”…

    Isn’t the bulb designed to indicate that the electric motor that runs the hydraulic pump is running? My knowledge of the turret systems is letting me down here but I’d assumed the traverse and elevation were hydraulically powered (and that the motor was remote from the turret so the gunner couldn’t hear or feel it working).

    Would the guns fire without hydraulic power? I’d say probably yes.

    NOTICE ANYTHING??? I just have…

    No, you’ve lost me there.

    in reply to: Strange Boulton Paul Defiant anecdote #1101404
    Creaking Door
    Participant

    …the Operating manual for the Defiant MkI specifically says the condensers were to stop arcing acros the switch contacts…

    Fair enough, I’d expect there to be condensers (capacitors) on the power circuit; especially to protect the wireless from interference caused by the electric motor that drives the hydraulic pump. However we should be clear what the condensers fitted to the ‘main switch’ (and other switches) are actually for.

    As far as I know (and with the usual disclaimer regarding my electrical knowledge) the condenser fitted across a switch is designed to prevent (or reduce) ‘arcing’ during the opening and closing of that switch but the switch will be fundamentally designed to avoid any possibility of arcing in its open position.

    A switch works by opening two contacts so that the voltage difference between them is unable to arc across the gap, because the air between acts as an insulator, but at some point during opening the contacts are close enough, without touching, for the electricity to jump the gap; to arc. This arcing generated extreme heat which damages the contacts and leaves an oxide layer which degrades current flow. To prevent this arcing, a condenser is fitted between the contacts, this provides an alternative path for a limited current to flow while the contacts are critically close and so prevents arcing.

    Condensers are not designed to prevent spontaneous arcing that would allow an open switch to become a closed switch.

    Do you have a similar passage for the firing circuit?

Viewing 15 posts - 9,421 through 9,435 (of 12,419 total)