…I also like them high up, because it provokes imagination, as to how it would of looked in the air…
Or you could go to an air display and watch the Battle of Britain Memorial Flight…
…which would require a lot less imagination! 😉
Welcome to the forum by the way. 🙂
It creates the sense of the aircraft flying, which i like.
It’s a pity the RAF don’t have some dedicated organisation memorialising the Battle-of-Britain…
…which were to actually fly Spitfires and Hurricanes! :rolleyes:
…the obscenely ostentatious and pretentious Disneyland funfair being proposed…
They could weave a rollercoaster between the aircraft…..it would have sweet **** all to do with the Battle-of-Britain…
…but visitor number ‘throughput’ would be high and they’d make a bomb on the catering!
(Sorry, not allowed to mention bombs.) 😮
I think you’ll find that is ‘an inspirational new interpretation for 21st Century’! :diablo:
Wasn’t there a similar scheme in London selling imported ‘love rats’ for you cheating partner…
…just before the Black Death? :diablo:
Wasn’t there a similar scheme in London selling imported ‘love rats’ for you cheating partner…
…just before the Black Death? :diablo:
Excuse my earlier comments about replica aircraft as I’d only read the text of the links (no sound at the moment on my PC). After watching the video (with headphones) I cannot say I’m much impressed. Stunning architecture without question but not right for the RAFM; where were we supposed to be standing to get that view of this thing towering above those woods, and what woods?
There seems to be support for my worries about visitors being herded through; up the lift then down the spiral (and one way traffic only I suppose :rolleyes:).
With regard to the aircraft how are they going to get them in, or out, and how is anybody going to get into the aircraft cockpits? Or is it once they’re in, they’re in! It is bad enough in the current Battle-of-Britain hall, I’ve been going for decades and I’ve never seen the other side of the He111 (or Ju88) and that’s just parked in a hangar…
…it could have ‘long live Hitler’ written on the other side and nobody would know! :diablo:
(Anybody else notice that the Bf110 and Ju88 have stopped being night-fighters!)
And of course the Battle-of-Britain is the only period of history that the RAF (or Britain for that matter) ever had! (Not like all that nasty bombing and stuff. :rolleyes:)
“Visitors will move through a ground-floor exhibition before being ‘scrambled’ via a high-speed lift to the top of the building, where replica aircraft will be on display with sounds of aerial battle. The roof will offer panoramic views of London and there will also be interactive audiovisual displays telling the story of the battle.”
Replica aircraft? Visitors ‘scrambled’ via a high-speed lift…..‘herded’ is the word I think they’re looking for…
…and the real aircraft? Oh, those old things you mean sir…..I think they’re in that dingy shed over there!
It’s worse than I thought! 😡
Sorry, but I’m utterly opposed to this for three main reasons:
Firstly, as has been pointed out, there are already monuments to the Battle-of Britain pilots; I can think of at least two large-scale monuments (and I’ve no real interest in monuments).
Secondly, what is the aim of this monstrosity; to raise awareness of the battle? The cost of £80 million is a huge sum of money and can only be raised at the expense of other aviation preservation or commemoration projects (and on a side issue compare it to the £3.5 million that is to be spent on the memorial for the 55,000 Bomber Command crew who were killed) and (much less) money could be better spent raising awareness in other ways.
Thirdly, is it intended to bring more visitors to the RAF Museum? Surely most visitors will be interested in aircraft and not ‘striking monuments’ (even if they do have a ‘high-speed lift’ :rolleyes:). Also this thing is going to be in Hendon; hardly the most sympathetic surroundings for such a monument?
Former Labour Education Minister Kim Howells:
“I tell you why it’s been rejected by most Labour MPs. Because they know that they’re [the Lib-Dems] a bunch of opportunistic toe-rags, who’ll say anything to anybody in order to get power. And they’ve done it this time, they’ve got power. Good luck to them.”
Good to see somebody is putting their own education to good use! :rolleyes:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8676675.stm
Former Labour Education Minister Kim Howells:
“I tell you why it’s been rejected by most Labour MPs. Because they know that they’re [the Lib-Dems] a bunch of opportunistic toe-rags, who’ll say anything to anybody in order to get power. And they’ve done it this time, they’ve got power. Good luck to them.”
Good to see somebody is putting their own education to good use! :rolleyes:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8676675.stm
Don’t knock the Tories…..they were on your side at Culloden! :diablo:
Don’t knock the Tories…..they were on your side at Culloden! :diablo:
Would the V-2 have buried itself that far in the ground if it hit in a built up area , ie hitting concrete or stone?
Not sure that hitting a concrete road, for example, would have made any difference to the warhead exploding three metres underground but what about a V-2 hitting a building more than three metres tall?
I wonder how the author feels about Stalin choosing not evacuate civilians from Stalingrad? :diablo: