dark light

Blitzo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,256 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2122888
    Blitzo
    Participant

    [USER=”77826″]XB-70[/USER]

    Reliable information about WS-15 is few and far between.

    However, my key point is that the claims made on SCMP by Minnie Chan suggesting WS-15 was ready for imminent mass production and that it was expected for J-20 to turn up at Zhuhai with WS-15 were obviously ridiculous.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2122935
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Didn’t the Hong Kong media say something about this? Something about how this engine was supposed to make an appearance at the airshow? Or did they get that wrong?

    They got it wrong.

    Basically, ignore any SCMP article about the PLA if it’s written by Minnie Chan.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2126901
    Blitzo
    Participant

    @inst

    There is now a huge fight going on on SDF given interpretations of insider leaks, the Minnie Chan SCMP article, and so on, about whether the WS-15 will appear installed at Zhuhai this year, and whether it will be deployed on the J-20.

    FYI, Deino, Blitzo, and latenlazy are vehemently against the notion as it goes against their current analysis, and they regard sources and source interpretation as either unreliable or just fradulent. Others are more enthusiastic, but the ultimate test will come down to what we see at Zhuhai.

    Actually I have no issue with WS-15 potentially making an appearance at Zhuhai. I’d be pleasantly surprised if it did appear in any form, but I don’t think it’s impossible.

    What I do think is impossible is the article’s claim that WS-15 would see widespread installation on J-20s by the end of the year.

    Deino did a good job of describing my position to Minne Chan’s credibility and the overall way sources and credibility should be judged.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2131206
    Blitzo
    Participant

    +1 to latenlazy.

    I feel like entire debate in this thread over the last few days has been mostly because Inst making interpretations that statements of STR through various steps somehow equal supermaneuverability and “best thing ever” and feeling compelled to argue against it, when that hasn’t been latenlazy’s position at all.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2132493
    Blitzo
    Participant

    @Inst

    Supposedly the Chinese are only planning to produce 100 J-20As, and look as though they’ll have production capacity for 48 J-20s starting next year. The J-20B, the one with the WS-15, though, is scheduled for a fuller tranche of 500 units. This is just rumor, of course.

    … I haven’t come across this rumour before.

    It does make sense if the Chinese are planning to use the J-20s just to offset and intimidate local powers, but with less than the J-20B, they aren’t that competent vs the F-35 and F-22. Building tons of J-20A before the WS-15 is ready implies significant wastage in terms of having to upgrade them to J-20Bs later on, and given the fineness of stealth construction, the upgraded J-20As could end up being crippled in terms of stealth.

    A simplistic but I think decent way of looking at it, might be to imagine if the F-22 when it entered service in 2006 had to use uprated F100 powerplants, and that F119 would only be ready after 6 or more years.

    In such a situation, would it have been more beneficial for the USAF to have inducted F-22s with F100 engines in numbers, before then inducting F-22s with intended F119 engines later on, or would it have been better for the USAF to have inducted F-22 only when the F119 engines were ready many years later.

    I’m not sure what you mean by upgraded J-20As being crippled in terms of stealth because of the possibility of upgrading them to J-20″B” considering we don’t know how big the extent of changes of a WS-15 equipped J-20 will actually be. And even if the differences are significant, if they do decide to MLU the J-20As to have WS-15s I can’t see why the upgrade process would not be able to reconstruct the aircraft with the appropriate signature management expected of the aircraft.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2132644
    Blitzo
    Participant

    The sawtooth pattern is also present on the trailing edge of the main wings.

    I suppose the question is how can you tell the presence of sawtooth pattern and dischargers indicate that there were difficulties, vs say if the aircraft did not have those features.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2134569
    Blitzo
    Participant

    that cnn article doesn’t claim, suggest or allude to carriers being obsolete?

    After all the article is talking about the 055, one of whose roles will be escorting PLAN carriers.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2136810
    Blitzo
    Participant

    I think they’re talking about it figuratively; the 1000 km thing is not an indication of actual range either.

    That said, it is likely indicative of a new generation SAM that they’ve been working on for a while.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2138220
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Yeah, that is about the range of what my guess would be as well. But still a semi-educated guess unfortunately. PLAAF are keeping their aces close to their chest…

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2138226
    Blitzo
    Participant

    @KGB

    What is going on here with the J-20 program ?? Why is nobody keeping track of it ?

    The Chinese brass say that the jet is in service. With what engines ? Surly this first batch isn’t fully stealth. They don’t have serrated engine nozzles.

    How many are being built ?

    Everyone is watching the su 57 at every turn and making theories about the state of the program yet the J-20 program just goes unnoticed. Everyone just nods their head when the Chinese make statements about the program.

    Unfortunately no one knows what is really going on with J-20 anymore since it finished development and began to enter service.

    Basically, no more prototypes are really being built except for a few engine testbeds, and all other new production seems to be for aircraft intended for service. That makes it hard to keep track of the number of aircraft being produced, as that number is likely a sensitive one and something the military will want to keep somewhat secret.

    Only semi estimated guesses can be made as to the number of aircraft that have been produced thus far.

    In other words, at this point the new “information” that we will get regarding J-20 will likely be in the form of much delayed info or pics showing new units receiving J-20s. We won’t be getting new pics of every new J-20 airframe produced anymore like we did with the J-20 prototypes in the 2001-2016 period.

    in reply to: PLAN News Thread #4 #1999677
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Well Sun Bo sits quite high up in CSIC in general, the conglomerate which includes DL shipyard that built 002 and refitted Liaoning.

    Considering the extent of Xi’s anti corruption campaign it’s a bit of a stretch to tie his disciplining with 002, considering 002 by all accounts and by all pictures that we have is progressing along the path that is expected.

    in reply to: PLAN News Thread #4 #1999682
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Weird logic considering Liaoning also spent about three and a half months in dry dock between its first sea trial and its second sea trial.
    It would’ve been surprised if 002 did not also spend a similar amount of time after its first sea trial as well.

    And considering we can even see externally that 002 still had systems to install like whip antennae on the ski jump and the arrest or cables (!!), and how most ships would need additional internal work as well, News.au is unfortunately not helping with its tabloid reputation.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2142817
    Blitzo
    Participant

    SAC and CAC are not parts suppliers right? I assume they use the same subcontractors.

    Just because J-10 and Dark Sword both are single engine canard deltas doesn’t mean they have a similar lineage or use similar parts…

    In any case, I imagine we’ll get more info over the next few days to suggest whether this mock up is legit (i.e.: from SAC/AVIC or something unrelated to them), as well as whether it is in any form of development atm.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2000295
    Blitzo
    Participant

    @Blackarcher

    Thanks for the link.

    I wonder then, what state of completion INS Vikrant will be in when it is “commissioned” in October 2020? A 4-5 month sea trial period is not very long at all, you’d expect a year more reasonably at minimum.

    Or in other words, (rhetorical question) what — if any — hardware difference is there between when INS Vikrant is commissioned in October 2020 vs when it is fully combat capable in 2024? All the major sensors, internal subsystems, aircraft handling and arresting systems, etc…

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2001060
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Are there any reliable updates as to when INS Vikrant might go for sea trials?

    I occasionally pop onto some of the Indian defence forums hoping for up to date pics of INS Vikrant’s fitting out at CSL to gauge when it might start on sea trials, but I can never seem to find any that show definite substantial progress (like having the MF STAR arrays put in, for example), and one report earlier this year quoted an IN officer saying they expected to hand over the ship for sea trials by the end of this year to be commissioned in 2020.

    http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/navy-confident-of-commissioning-aircraft-carrier-vikrant-in-two-years/article22474986.ece

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,256 total)