dark light

Blitzo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,256 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ROCAF News & Discussion #2331790
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Can’t imagine Europe selling fighters and risking falling put with china. Maybe Taiwan could try allying with India for lca but they might be better off building new variants of idf instead — and despite everything I can’t imagine India will have a lot to gain by pissing off china either.
    Basically the chances of Taiwan getting foreign fighters is very low at the moment. But who knows, if cross strait relations improve substantially in the next few years china may sell them some j-10a’s (terms and conditions apply)

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036547
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Okay, now that the double-standard Japanese-Briton and the Indian troll has taken a rest, I just want to intervene and say that the lines on this flat-top are the most beautiful of all carriers operational. Would you agree? The curving ski-jump just makes it so much more beautiful, and she seems to be in way better shape than the Kuznet.

    My timeline as to when it will become fully operational:
    2014

    I am a bit sad that it has FLANKERS on it, I am hoping the PLAN will come up with a smaller plane that is more STOL, so more can fit in, and it is more efficient.

    Smaller planes probably won’t have enough range for whatever ops the plan wants to undertake with it’s carrier. And i don’t think being a smaller fighter will help that much than being a larger one because engine thrust will be less as well/smaller engines?

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036696
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Now come on…

    If you have a pistol then at least say it is for shooting and not for hitting the nail into the wall. There are better things out there to do that job. 😉

    Fair enough, but my point is that PLAN carriers can be used for a lot of other things than disputes with SCS countries, and the reason the PLAN wants them is certainly not due to that.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036708
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Blitzo, you don’t need carriers to protect chinese shipping in long patrols. Nor do you need them for disaster relied. LPDs are much more useful than carriers full of munitions and purpose kit.

    Projecting power is the right answer & that is entirely what the debate was about, instead of all this irrelevant sidetrack about a mythical Japanese threat. Carriers are powerful statements of intent. Thats about it. Could have just agreed on that in the beginning & everyone could have walked on.

    A carrier with helicopters full of supplies instead of jets, and its comprehensive hospital wing would not be unhelpful for disaster relief… (They’re building LPDs too just for the record) And in times of crisis a carrier is far superior than a few frigates in protecting shipping, air cover and all. In times of peace the protection of shipping is more for projecting power and showing the flag.
    Besides, projecting power includes the above two examples but okay. My point was that the reason for PLAN having carriers is not due to disputes in the SCS with neighbours, and they will certainly not be confined there.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036728
    Blitzo
    Participant

    You just repeated exactly the same points which you noted the first time around. Which brings me in turn to the same points I noted earlier. That their military posture is predominantly defensive. Having a potent navy is nothing wrong. Look at their GDP, look at them -they are an island nation! That does not mean the Japanese are a threat. Again, their AF & Army are in no position to influence events in PRC or conduct some huge strike.

    What else can it do? Against the smaller nations, it at least has a chance.
    At any rate, this is a matter of conjecture at present, so you might as well be right.

    Imma refrain from replying to the first paragrph.

    But I cautiously answer this; apart from being used in territorial disputes it can certainly be used for long patrols in the indian ocean protecting chinese shipping once they’re familiar with the carriers enough, like PLAN destroyers and frigates have been doing for the last two years. Other scenarios include disaster relief, projecting power, or situations in african countries if chinese economic interests and citizens are threatened.

    I don’t think it’s fair to say the varyag and future chinese carriers are aimed at a future in the SCS. It’s going to be quite a bit beyond there.

    Blitzo
    Participant

    America’s inaction on the F-16s is because of chinese pressure, not because the mainland might be able to crack F-16’s secrets… It’s not like ROCAF pilots regularly defect or anything.

    Not quite sure what you’re trying to say by “your government” either.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036748
    Blitzo
    Participant

    from pure rumor mill on chinese internet.

    1) a 4 planes formation from a PLAN naval aviation regiment did a low pass during the trial.
    some said they did a touch and go.

    2) AEW Ka-31 landed. may be Z-8.

    Xinhua news reporter was on the ship twitting out last moment before ship got underway.
    so we know a news crew was on board.
    so we should have pictures. I hope.

    did all 4 attempt a touch and go? Sounds like more of a ceremonial thing if not.
    Any idea if they were carrier aircraft (J-15, JL-9J) or naval flankers or even J-10s? 😮

    I’m sure eventually we’ll get pictures of the ship’s activities at sea from official sources… And sooner than we will get official pics of J-20 too I wager.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036765
    Blitzo
    Participant

    By engineer over on SDF

    The ship number is going to be 01.

    This says 88Y.
    http://i.imgur.com/ABjdh.jpg

    This says 01Y.
    http://i.imgur.com/AX8Ci.jpg

    http://i.imgur.com/XrObN.gif

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036776
    Blitzo
    Participant

    http://i53.tinypic.com/9zwtns.jpg

    Miss Hong Kong 2011(far left) and 3 of the runnerups saluting in front of USS Ronald Reagan docked in Hong Kong harbor. 2 of the ladies gave the correct military salute (with right hand). While the other 2 ladies gave the incorrect salute (with the left hand), and will be soon drafted in the Army.

    Heh better than the previous stuff I suppose.

    Let’s wait for the day when a chinese carrier reciprocates to hawaii :p

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036790
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Back on topic:

    Carrier returns to Dalian after maiden sea trial
    Updated: 2011-08-15 07:36
    By Zhao Lei (China Daily)
    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-08/15/content_13109461.htm

    BEIJING – The country’s first aircraft carrier finished its maiden sea trial on Sunday and returned to port in Dalian, Northeast China’s Liaoning province, domestic media reported.

    At about 10:30 am, the carrier, which was known as the “Varyag” when at the Black Sea Shipyard in Ukraine, broke through a thick fog and appeared about 3 kilometers east of the docks of the Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co Ltd, which refitted the giant ship, according to the Beijing-based Mirror Evening News.

    Carrier returns to Dalian after maiden sea trial

    Accompanied by seven tugboats, China’s first aircraft carrier breaks through a thick fog to appear near the docks of the Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co Ltd in Northeast China’s Liaoning province, August 14, 2011. [Photo/CFP]

    At least seven tugboats guided the vessel to the dock, the report said.

    Naval officers on the deck were seen “leisurely strolling”, it added. The aircraft carrier sounded its horn three times as it approached the shipyard, exactly as it did when departing on Wednesday.

    People waiting on the dock lit firecrackers to welcome the returning carrier, as seen in a video clip shot by a military fan that was posted on fyjs.cn, a major Chinese military forum.

    At 11:30 am, the vessel, surrounded by the tugboats, docked.

    An hour later, another huge ship bearing hull number 88 returned to the place where it had been anchored near the carrier’s berth, said the Mirror Evening News.

    The conclusion of the sea trial sparked a new round of online jubilation by Chinese military enthusiasts, who have been closely following every step of the vessel’s refitting and sharing photos and information about the ship on military websites.

    “I think the aircraft carrier is now more powerful and mighty after it successfully conducted the trial,” said netizen “feibaoluyang” on fyjs.cn.

    “I shall have a big drink with my friends tonight!”

    Some fans in Dalian said they had the honor of witnessing the return of “Mother Varyag”, nickname given by naval enthusiasts to the ship.

    “I saw the Five-Star Red Flag, our national flag, flying at the top of the superstructure, which excited me the most,” a Dalian resident and military fan surnamed Liu told China Daily on Sunday.

    “When the ship came into sight, I found I couldn’t take a good picture since my hands were trembling. There were no helicopters or airplanes on deck, but that didn’t sour our happiness.”

    Fans are fiercely debating topics such as when the as-yet-unnamed “aircraft carrier platform”, the term used by the Chinese military authorities, will enter active service and whether airplanes actually tried to land on the deck during the five-day trial voyage.

    Early media reports cited unidentified military sources as saying that the vessel is supposed to be handed over to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy around Aug 1 next year, which will be the PLA’s 85th anniversary.

    Zhang Xiaomin contributed to this story.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036796
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Shut up about politics and just concentrate on news and picture of the hardware and we’ll be fine.

    Amen to that!

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036823
    Blitzo
    Participant

    So basically this thread is going down in flames.

    Sorry for mentioning india in the first place, I never meant to challenge its military spending at all or its relationship with China but was using it (and other countries in general) as a rejection of the idea that you must have all this social welfare in place before you start spending on your navy.

    Though I suppose any thread about China and aircraft carriers will have devolved to this.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036835
    Blitzo
    Participant

    What Japanese military potency? Where? Compared to China, they can’t do much. They have a first class Navy, and thats about it. They depend on the US for a nuclear deterrent (and nobody even know how far that stretches) and support, a limited population base, next to no offensive weaponry that can reach out and touch China, a national policy that is still wiffle waffle on even things like deployment to Afghanistan and this is military potency? Hardly.

    Japan has the most potent navy of any asian country, perhaps even the second or third best in the world, their air force and army are powerful and they have the technological and industrial might to back it up.
    If they weren’t allied with America against China then this might be less of an issue but as it stands Japan’s military is still a potent threat.

    With all due respect, thats tphuang’s opinion. Its as valid or not, as many of the other opinions in this thread, but it is not fact. At least we cannot say it is.

    Fair enough but assuming the carrier will be used only, or even mostly for contesting disputed waters is flawed imo.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036838
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Invasion and mass murder aren’t the only thing a weak military allows enemies to do. The whole gamut from blockade to denial of access to sawing off of sovereign territory are there as options for Japan as long as China’s military is kept weak.

    But the collective memory can’t forget the invasion and mass murder committed by Japan any more than Israel can forget the Holocaust. China and the Chinese race would have to be stupid if it didn’t prepare for the worst case scenario. Just like the Israel would be stupid if it didn’t prepare the same way.

    And what guarantee is there that Japan who won’t attempt a 1895? This was limited warfare to embarrass China and weaken Chinese control its periphery. China lost Taiwan and the Daiyutais at the time. Okinawa also went from an autonomous state allied to the Ch’ing to Japanese territory.

    The only thing I disagree with is the implicit idea that Japan will try to attempt similar actions towards china in the near future.
    Past experience from sino-japanese wars, Japan’s current military strength and its alliance with america imo are more valid reasons for china’s military modernization on the subject of the land of the rising sun, than a potential scenario of Japan invading mainland china.

    in reply to: China Aircraft Carrier Trials #2036870
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Like it or not, China’s carrier has more to do with its disputes over the island chain than trying to fend off some mythical Japanese invasion. At least thats what a logical mind would think because the former scenario is more reasonable than something as unreasonable as a Japanese invasion (with what exactly, over expensive LCD TVs?).

    I think golden dragon first mentioned the Japanese but it wasn’t directly in the form of them invading the chinese mainland, but rather continued unease over Japan’s military potency.

    And the carriers are not primarily focused on disputes with other countries — like tphuang said a page back it’s mostly going to be for protecting their SLOCs, shipping from either the USN or even the IN.

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 1,256 total)