dark light

Blitzo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,256 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2372334
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Range is not a strong point of the F-22 compared to the F-15s for the same reasons.
    Engine-wise the J-20 is still a generation behind and will come close to the F100/F110 of the 80s at best.

    What if the WS-15 approached F119 standard, how would that affect the J-20’s range from your previous estimate?

    And which reason makes the F-22’s range not a strong point compared to F-15s, engine efficiency? :confused: I was under the impression the F-22’s blended wing gave greater fuel volume and its internal weapons lessened drag, improving range.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2372387
    Blitzo
    Participant

    As a stealth design with internal weaponsbay the range will be similar of a F-15A two ETs. To make use of some supercruise capability it will be even shorter close to a clean F-15A.

    And how does the F-22’s combat radius compare?

    Because J-20 will almost definitely be above that unless their engines are significantly more inefficient.
    (What is the range of an F-15A with 2 ETs and a clean F-15A?)

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372391
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Oh yeah, forgot about that aircraft — yes that would most likely be 1034 then. Unless PLAAF has a thing for changing engines on prototype aircraft >_>

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2372403
    Blitzo
    Participant

    The 03 prototype for each new variant (again, for chengdu, at least) has the mission avionics installed (can’t give source, but that’s the general consensus over the years).

    So yeah, hoping for radar and EODAS and any other goodies to be present on 2003.

    And while J-20 isn’t as long as long as F-111, it isn’t that much smaller either. Kinda between F-111 and F-22 length (21m?), with seemingly much more internal volume than the latter. Again, while it isn’t a bomber either it should be able to operate pretty comfortably along the second island chain without refuelling.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372407
    Blitzo
    Participant

    For chengdu at least, the 02 prototype of every new aircraft variant seems to be the static testbed yeah — we haven’t seen 1032 yet, nor 1034 I believe.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372548
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Video compilation of J-20, J-10B with WS-10A, JF-17 all taking off and landing within the time of a day.

    http://www.56.com/flashApp/56.11.07.26.swf?vid=NjIwODYxNzQ&ref=www.***********
    Gawd J-10B looks awesome.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2372680
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Gives it an unattractive humpback look now :-/

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372764
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Were they now? The latest rumours say PAF will be getting J-10s with russian engines… We’ll see I suppose.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372769
    Blitzo
    Participant

    http://i55.tinypic.com/oaap02.jpg

    J-10B with WS-10A… 😀 😀 😀 (Pretty clear it’s WS-10, for skeptics. People, including myself have been watching the rear end of the J-10 for years and it was always Al-31. This engine is clearly different and correlates with the known nozzle of WS-10A.)

    … Assuming it isn’t a PS. But I don’t think it is, doesn’t have that smell to it.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #1997227
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Lulzy I doubt any PLAN carriers can be effective against westpac “foreign warships” in the near future — it’s certainly not their role to counter them in the near term.

    national security and development’s more accurate. defending sea lanes, far foreign interests etc.

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #1997236
    Blitzo
    Participant

    What’s wrong with dark grey? IMO much more menacing than boring white or light grey, that is my biggest peeve with PLAN ships, otherwise really smooth, elegant designs recently.

    Dark grey like the USN looks great, and PLAN grey isn’t too exciting but looks pretty professional and sleek. Some of the newer Russian navy ships are alright too (not sure why they keep the orange/brown on their decks and surfaces though). I’m not certain what the AK looks like at present, but at one point it donned this:

    😮
    http://img65.imageshack.us/img65/3457/02173060si1.jpg
    At best it looks unattractive, at worst it has the colouring of something you’d find at a junkyard 🙁
    Unless it arose from staying at sea too long? But it doesn’t seem like corrosion. Anyway can’t judge taste in colour I s’pose.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372907
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Then who said : ” J-20 has a black one does that mean it will be using non aesa or even non ESA?”.is the quoted one NOT part of ur point then? I was answeing the J20 even don’t hv a radar now, how do u know the color of radome and this case should not be mentioned at all.

    Oh I see what you mean now. But assuming the 3rd J-20 prototype was wearing the same colours my point would stand.
    We can leave out the J-20, even. My point is, does a grey radome on PLAAF and PLANAF fighters mean the aircraft is equipped with an ESA? Does it matter at all? My conclusion is prolly not.

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #1997261
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Well Kuz has been around the world unlike poor rusting Varyag, so I think it’s ok :D.

    Kuz is getting heavy refit itself, will be an interesting comparison with Varyag when completed.

    Hope they give a better paint scheme…

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372984
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Is J20 nose really that black. Like the color of J11b’s radome? Or because J20 current color scheme is like that dark ?. The current J20 prototype most likely without radar, so it’s immature to say what color of J20 radome is .

    My point is asking whether we can speculate what type of radar they’re using just based ok the colour of the radome.
    Kind is like how people say just because something’s matte black, it might have RAM coating.

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #1997268
    Blitzo
    Participant

    Given her significantly more advanced sensor suite and the fact that the Chinese are building her into a pure carrier(space formerly occupied by Granit VLS has probably been used for hangar expansion), plus the fact that she’s essentially brand new, I’d say she IS in better shape than the Kuznetsov.

    BTW, Russian ships are usually referred to as ‘he’, so the correct term would be ‘older brother’.:D

    Any real information on where the Chinese plan to go from here? More Varyags? Or some CVF-sized supercarriers with steam catapults?:diablo:

    Rumors are they have two conventionally powered CV’s building right now (no idea what stage, but one should be ahead of the other). Also current stance is they’ll have cats–we’ll see in a few years when they become unable to hide them anymore.

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,256 total)