dark light

ananda

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 495 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2315583
    ananda
    Participant

    There may be other ways to reform the PSUs but one of the sure ways is to privatise.

    Change of ownership into a profit oriented private house will indeed change everything, for they have something at stake, something to lose and not playing with tax payer money.

    There’s also another alternative, in Indonesia some Government company being listed to stock market, however The gov,ernment still hold the controling majority. Partial privitisation like this able to turn some of government enterprises as much better company on operational behaviour even outstrip private companies (being local or foreign owned).

    This move can be middle way/compromise on the issue of publlc/government owned entity. The entity be more transparant while at the same time the government still control. It’s not perfect, but still acceptable compromise.

    in reply to: MMRCA for Malaysia #2315653
    ananda
    Participant

    which begs the question.. were they delivered with any AShMs? I’ve only seen them with R-73s..

    and on a related question, their Indonesian counterparts, i don’t see them flying with anything!! 😮

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_WcLctjhxgm0/TLRjM7AO1QI/AAAAAAAAAGw/8ghWtHbgiFI/s1600/sukhoi.jpg

    Try to take a peak on Indonesian forum (like ‘kaskus’) or in military photos, there’s a guy already put a picture of Indonesian Flankers droping OFAB dumb bombs on an exercise early this year. TNI-AU still got inventory of OFAB from 60’s and some local company in here already made copy of OFAB.

    But beside OFAB I also still haven’t seen any pictures of Indonesian flankers with arms. They suppose to get new armament this year for the Flankers. But besides some unconfirmed ranting from local fan boys of the flankers already armed with R-27 and R-73, I still haven’t seen solid proof they already exist in Indonesian AF inventory.

    Unless you want to trust wiki that already put Indonesia as users of those two missiles.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2034658
    ananda
    Participant

    ex-Varyag photos (Sept 7, 2011)

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZOpptCzEMtQ/Tmm35-t2pGI/AAAAAAAAMD4/59bOoJuufrA/s1600/25_169310_3e7c9dbb209be7f.jpg
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NjAPITpzmSY/Tmm36ERPbgI/AAAAAAAAMD8/UHGRSBJQ4LU/s1600/25_169310_39ded17a2394424.jpg
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-fu3WUzg4eTo/Tmm37o27jxI/AAAAAAAAMEQ/O6qeLektQKY/s1600/25_169310_ff010c403f0cd11.jpg

    Photos credit:
    http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2011/09/ex-varyag-photos-sept-7-2011.html

    can’t wait until first aircraft land there. Then real potential of that carrier can truly be judged.

    in reply to: MMRCA for Malaysia #2315965
    ananda
    Participant

    ananda@
    If that is the case, then Malaysia will wait for the Indian Super 30’s to enter deliveries and order them as well.
    Malaysia do not need a two unit type AF.. not by a long shot..

    Sadly logical procurement in Southeast Asia seems so far belong to Singapore alone. Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia try to folow more logic on their current procurement, but I’m afraid many Politicians in SEA still like mudling politics on defense issue.

    I’m afraid politically when reading malaysian forum and political commentators, they still want combination of Russian and Western stuff. I agree with the size, SEA AF including Malaysia should fokus on one type, but foccusing on two are already improvement from previously three or four. Thus I believe Malaysian will wait for MMRCA. However if it’s take too long then getting more Flankers can happening (unless some political factors not come muddling again).

    in reply to: Strength of the RN with QEC #2034671
    ananda
    Participant

    Sorry if this a little bit of topic. Trying to find answered, is UK’s politician now already decided on the fate of PoW ? Is going to be put on reserve without fixed wing capabilities like Defence Plan ? Or they already agree for fully capable PoW even though still has to share the airwing with QE?

    in reply to: MMRCA for Malaysia #2316010
    ananda
    Participant

    this thread is starting to sound like the Indian MMRCA thread :diablo:

    perhaps like the Su-30, they’ll pick whatever the Indian’s pick.. makes it easier to get spares and support at least.

    I think that could be it. Reading on some coment from Malaysian forum, seems unofficially some malaysian politicians wants to see what the choice India will take. Malaysia if not mistaken already have some cooperation with India on Flankers servicing (on training side). I believe their Flanker have more comonality with Indian ones (Oposites Indonesian ones that have more commonality with Chinese ones).

    With Malaysian already comfortable having cooperation with Indian Air Force, thus it’s reasonable they will want to wait which Aircraft Indian will choose.

    in reply to: MMRCA for Malaysia #2317356
    ananda
    Participant

    Why not the T 50 ?

    I think Malaysia wants to keep balance of Western and Russian assets. They already have Su-30 and plan to add another sq of SU-30. Thus getting Typhoon as replacement for all their other existing assets (Mig 29, F-5 and F-18D), will be reasonable way to keep the balance.

    in reply to: MMRCA for Malaysia #2317430
    ananda
    Participant

    From this Bae system site http://www.baesystems.com/malaysia

    It’s clear that Bae, offered some kind of flexibility and independence for Malaysian for further upgrading and maintenance of the Typhoon. Thus it’s reasonable to think that Malaysian in fact try to standardize (replace) all their Fighter asset (except SU-30) with Typhoon (if the deal goes through).

    Thus this will made RMAF fighter assets standardize only to two type of Fighter. This will provide RMAF with relative small but capable fleet. In such I believe the offered and the move for Typhoon is make sense for Malaysia.

    Malaysia need to think what they can bet for future fleet. Both Malaysia and Indonesia already choose SU-30 for their Heavy Fighters as move to answered Singaporean F-15SG. Singapore betting then for F-35, whille Indonesia betting with Project with ROK (and potentially Turkey) of KFX. Malaysia need to bet on something, thus Typhoon I believe is reasonable choice.

    ananda
    Participant

    I agree that is kind of why I started this im just curious how these era ships would hold up

    I can’t talk much on What India tactics on using their carrier for wholleout engagement with Pakistan. However for the Indonesian anticipations on taking on Dutch Karel Dorman (from what I read through TNI-AL historical writing) was mainly swarming the Karel Dorman air defences with IL-28 torpedo’s (ie, anti ship IL-28 version), thus lure/engaging on Karel Dorman’s Sea Hawk out from air defense duty. While at pararel time speed the Sverdlov’s Cruiser (KRI Irian ex Orzhokenidze) to taking on Karel Dorman plus their Destroyer escort supporting by large number of Whiskey submarines.

    Remembered this based on Sovyet doctrin, and eventhough officially not recognised, it’s not a secret if the West Papua crisis betwen Dutch and Indonesia got hot, the Indonesian Navy flotilla will also included high number of Sovyet ‘advisors’.

    ananda
    Participant

    I got this idea reading about the what if thread on the RN fleet carrier had they been at Yankee station. Now I think this would be a interesting fight between the greats. I was wondering what others would say for a naval action between India and say Pakistan or Indonesia.. or some other lesser developed country set around the late 60’s or early 70’s or even maybe a commonwealth nation like Australia defending its interests in the South China Sea… or some sort of action around S. and or Latin America, but if they had these ships as their main capital ships.

    Isn’t India already used their Collosus carrier against Pakistan ? I think they used the carrier to support naval blockade.

    While Dutch Collosus (Karel Dorman) close to get involved in Naval engagement with Indonesia during West Papua crisis in the 60’s. That time the Indonesian Capital ship would be Sverdlov class cruiser. Now that will be interesting to see if that happen.

    After all isn’t the Sovyet design those Sverdlov to take on light carriers like Collosus or Independence (which probably will be escorting supply line in the north Atlantic). I think the concept between Fast Light Cruisers raiders against Light Carriers Escorting trade supply line.

    in reply to: Carrier Hilarity on the Beeb #2331666
    ananda
    Participant

    I have little knowledge on what British politics look like now this days, so I’m not going to talk much on that. However the usage of Carrier, well it depends on who’s you’re going to project your power against to.

    If UK’s want to retract herself and stay insular, and will not facing anybody outside her own protective land based umbrella, well no carrier needed. Australia for example do not faced anybody nearby that can threaten her shipping lines thus her life line to outside world. However when the 60’s as Indonesian Air Force much better equiped (for 60’s technology) with help of USSR, and did have capabilities for long range maritim strikes, well Australia at that time did have and maintain operational carrier forces.

    India wants to project her power across the vastness of Indian ocean from Malaca Strait to Persian Gulf, thus she need 3 carrier according to her defense requirements to be able to project independent Naval force that will able to withstand potential threat from land based Air Power they think they will faced in their choosen area of influences.

    It all come back to Politics. If you want something that can project your power beyond the coverage of your land based air power, then carrier is the answered. But if politically you do want to do that anymore, and why bother with carriers.

    Well I think the UK citizen as a nation should answered that basic question. Do you still want to project your power far beyond your own border..?? If that still yes, and accept the carrier. If not, and UK’s now chooses to stay insular and at best only Eurocentric, and then don’t bother with carrier (BTW, in that sense if you chooses that path, just give Falkland to Argies, it’s not in UK”s interest anymore :)).

    in reply to: Oil extraction in the Falklands #2368990
    ananda
    Participant

    Ananda, If to get that oil the UK government has to set up all this military hardware you describe over there, the Argentinians will have won… Because this will certainly end up being the most expensive oil extraction operation in the world, better leave the Crude on the ground and save on the expense… ;

    Ahhhh…that’s what I say before, it all back to how much oil and gas actually down there. Right now more and more Oil and Gas reserve has to be drilled from sea bed.

    You right in the sense it can get expensive, you also right potential some investor shy away due to their concern with Argentinian. However if there’s enough substantial amount of Gas and Oil and still economically viable to extract, and the UK decided to put enough defense infrastructures to ensured those investor they are protected, then some of them potentially still join the project.

    It’s come back to economics. If it’s big enough, then it can cover the cost of additional infrastructures (defense and logistics) that need to be set up. After all, the UK’s need to increased are the Typhoon and OPV down there. Thus diplomatically it can be seen more as robust defense and not offensive (although I don’t know what the Argentinian Air Force can do right now against 1 full sq of Typhoon).

    It will not be cheap, but I believe it’s doable as long as enough Oil and Gas proven can be economically extracted down there.

    in reply to: Oil extraction in the Falklands #2369466
    ananda
    Participant

    Apparently Chile has said no to that idea:

    http://en.mercopress.com/2009/12/10/chile-denies-any-plans-to-work-with-fogl-in-falklands-oil-exploration

    Of course there is plenty of experience in the UK with North Sea Oil so it would be interesting to see how many workers in the UK could be persuaded to go South.

    Well the way I see it, they deny any commercial deal has been agreed for commercial oil explorations on Falkland island. Like I said it can change when there’s large amount of oil come out.

    Chille can maintain officially they still support Argies position. Still business is business. Well Chille company can get good deal by not actually being in Falkland but provide logistical support the Oil company operating in Falkland.

    Right now the logistical based can be from Chille or South Africa. Like I said it depends on what’s the real value of the project worth anyway. It still take time, that perhaps the oil will come out by the time QE operational.

    Thus RN can leased some F-18 from USN, and put QE from time to time in Falkland, or just increased the Typhoon strength in Falkland to full sq strength. Put it like there, the Argentinian can make a lot of noises, but can’t do anything anyway.

    If there’s oil, then the value of Falkland increased in turn I believe even the UK’s Parliament willing to boost the defenses of the islands.

    in reply to: Oil extraction in the Falklands #2369482
    ananda
    Participant

    If this turn out putting large amount of Oil, Chille I think won’t mind get involved. Well is not like they have strong solidarity with Argentina anyway. But I think more the project can be supported logistically from South Africa.

    in reply to: Carrier Hilarity on the Beeb #2369815
    ananda
    Participant

    Gents, I’m not following the development of CVF as much as you guys, so please be patience with my questions.

    If I’m not mistaken QE will be ready by 2015, and PoW by 2017, while the Fighters wing will be partially ready by ‘only’ 2020. Is’t correct ?

    If that’s so, can RN leased some F-18 C/D for few years (I put C/D since it’s supposed to be cheaper and in surplus by that time) ? I know the Italians leased some F-16 to wait for their Eurotyphoon ready.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 495 total)