If you manage to catch the rationed 2 hour slot each day during which the Grahame-White Factory at Hendon is open, you’ll see most of the Nash Collection on show.
Must be “severe” rationing going on these days Robbo, as it was closed all day when I went on the 28th Feb. No doubt Fopp would be giving it “budget restraints, end of year financial restrictions blah blah blah” if he ever came out of his Ivory tower to answer some questions on his policies at RAFM.:mad: I remember him churning all this rubbish out in one of the Monthlies about 5 years ago, when asked. You’d have thought he would have got it sorted by now. Maybe its time for him to get a nice big clock on the mantlepiece and one of those “oh so now” golden handshakes that seem to be in vogue at the moment… :rolleyes:
Funny thing is I thought museums are pursuing the “education” agenda these days? Can’t see how you can educate anyone about the First World War and early aviation if you keep it locked away. He should have been a puppet for Doug Arnold in the Blackbushe days or maybe that’s where he nicked the idea from? 😉
Anyway Mosquito’s, lovely aeroplanes and I’m glad I got to see a few flying. I too had the “milestones” example as the backdrop to my RAF passing out parade at Swinderby back in the early ’80’s. It’s looking much tidier these days despite suffering a broken back when it got moved to St.Athan as the jury struts got left out after wing separation due to the team leader having an unfortunate sudden illness and the lads having to carry on without his knowledge IIRC.
If that were in the care of ARC at Duxford it would be flying again by Friday!
Err I doubt it! No one seems to have noticed that it’s got a folding prop rather than a matchstick one, so the engine is likely to be shall we say “poorly” right now.
Anymore? The 70’s & 80’s is the era of DX that i wish i could’ve witnessed, by far the most exciting time to be there IMO!
I did and it was…
That was in the days when the aircraft were the purpose of the place (it being an airfield after all) rather than the priorities of car parking spaces (right outside the hangars) and ugly buildings that dominate the scene of today although to be fair there are a few aeroplanes in between the boats and corporate entertaiment facilities…:rolleyes:
She certainly has a unique look and sound.
How can one forget the display of “Steam Power” demonstrated by the P39 when it conked-out at the 24 Alpha hold point at DX some years ago just prior to a Legends weekend…I was expecting the driver to get out, the door to fall off and him to be wearing a checked jacket, oversized boots, a red nose, zany hair and one of those squirty flowers on his lapel….:D
Oh he was :p
I understand the colours used have all been well researched and in the pictures that I’ve seen it has just the right sheen on the paint finish…;)
No they wouldn’t and the BS numbers are always interpretted by different paint manufacturers in their own way and even between batches within the same company. When I was on a Tornado Squadron in the RAF our aircraft spent a great deal of time outside and consequently the paint finish got weathered and sun bleached accordingly. That just goes to show the difference of two seemingly identical machines. Incidentally no one seems to have ever noticed that the shade of Dark earth used on BM597 has been incorrect since it was painted, being far too light in shade. Even the person who painted it would tell you so!
Comparing the Dark Earth and Green on P9374 with BS381 the colours look spot on. Well done to all those involved and to the owner in chosing that colour scheme. When you look at the front of the March edition of Aeroplane showing Hurricane R4118 and Spitfire AR213 the Dark earth colour looks distinctly different from P9374. Is this because they were outside in the “sun” , is it just the different printing or is there a different colour used? Perhaps its just my eyes!
Different paint chips to begin with, different painter, different interpretation of shades, different magazine….
Thanks for the nice comments about it. Paint shades are very difficult to interpret and to photograph. Ambient light can make a good looking shade look wrong just by the sun coming out to play. I know both colour specialists personally for AR213 and R4118 and they are very experienced in the field they operate in. I for example would say the colours on AR213 look a bit “suspect” myself, but that may be a fault of the manufacturer that was not noticed when the aircraft was painted inside a dingey polythene tent at Booker. Even in a Spraybake facility the colours can look strange due to the lighting provided within. You’d be amazed how dark the cammo looks until the roundels are applied! When the Mk1 and 1a, R4118 and P7350 (which I am doing the scheme for, I was just “advising” on the HFL machine) are all lined up outside in the sun one day somewhere I am sure Steve, Tom, Clive and myself will all be having an “interesting” discussion as to who has the right shade of Green or Brown! And what a sight those four aircraft would look together. 🙂
Ex-CAF Buchon coming on nicely, but before you ask, no it won’t “be at legends”…:rolleyes:
FW190 no news other than it is on public display again in hangar 3.
When the the articles in Flypast come out we all slaver over them
That’s more like it…:)
I expect the author of the article was under the impression that people would enjoy the sight of the Spitfire this early on, and enjoy the other information on SL633. I would imagine it was a way of giving the public an inside view of a private facility that is not part of the IWM, and therefore does not have public access. I don’t suppose he thought some people would use it as a way of moaning about things, but just appreciate the interesting images and information. I would imagine if he didn’t bother, then you wouldn’t be seeing anything of it until it gets rolled out in public and that could be quite a wait. I guess he shouldn’t have bothered and maybe he won’t in future. :rolleyes:
What do the code “42” stand for?
Cheers
Cees
Err… The meaning of life of course! 😉
i wonder what £6m would have done for all or some of the following
The RAFM Hampden – funded a complete restoratation?
The East Kirkby Hampden project – accellerated progress?
The Stirling project – brought back whatever resides in Russia?
The DH Hornet project – brought the wing section from Canada?
The Whitley project – perhaps centralise the diverse parts collections?to name just a few
Instead a relatively small number of people have seen a Vulcan fly a few times. The projects above when complete will remain as a homage to the people who flew in them for generations
Or even some well deserved hangarage or workshop buildings for some of the less glamourous museums operating on a shoestring and the good will of enthusiastic volunteers, oh and of course the Blenheim…;)
It would be nice if it stayed at bruntingthorpe. Atleast it will be garaunteed regular fast taxi runs.
So who is going to pay for the fuel and insurance? Not the lottery for sure, they’ve been milked enough! :rolleyes:
If there is no money to pay the outstanding bills I shouldn’t think it would be going anywhere.
Maybe pushed outside though, so that the hangar at Brunty can earn some money from commercial interests as it has done in the past …
Don’t expect TVOC will be caughing up rent :rolleyes:
I was the crewman (loadmaster) on that Chinook with my head stuck down the hatch lifting the Bucc! The Bucc had been stripped of almost everything to bring its weight down so we could lift it.
As if by magic…;)
From my archives:
Credit; Pic and article by Southend Evening Echo