dark light

Multirole

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vietnam's next big fighter purchase? #2174693
    Multirole
    Participant

    The f/a-50 would be ideal low cost buy to replace the mig-21’s. The Lockheed link would make a statement to China. Buying swedish has no meaningful political statement in regards to the Chinese issue.

    If it’s about making a political statement, why not buy the Tejas?

    in reply to: Vietnam's next big fighter purchase? #2174917
    Multirole
    Participant

    Vietnam will want something affordable with excellent short field capability. Gripen is a no brainer. Plus Sweden is less susceptible to economic pressure from the PRC than other vendors. They will probably buy something high profile from the U.S. just to make a political statement.

    in reply to: Solar Impulse 2 airborne #383241
    Multirole
    Participant

    I’ve been following for this, what an amazing age we live in.

    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2022227
    Multirole
    Participant

    Alexander Korolev wrote this impressive piece debunking the myths that Russo-Chinese alliance is not feasible.

    http://www.theasanforum.org/the-strategic-alignment-between-russia-and-china-myths-and-reality/

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2177161
    Multirole
    Participant

    Carlo Kopp wrote about the application of the Scaled Composites Proteus some years ago as a replacement for geosynchronous communication satellites. Proteus is smaller than the Divine Eagle and capable of high altitude loitering for over 18 hours. Although I don’t know where they would sling such a load on a twin hull airframe.

    http://www.ausairpower.net/AC-0999.html

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2177871
    Multirole
    Participant

    I should say, 0.1 is Super Hornet+stealth pod territory.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2178494
    Multirole
    Participant

    If the J-20 does have an air to ground role it shouldn’t surprise anyone. What modern fighter doesn’t? Look at the F-22 with its sub 200 production run, lack of role in the wars America presently finds itself in, and being retroactively shoe-horned for dropping bombs and tell me if it wouldnt have been specified as a multirole fighter if USAF knew during ATF design phase what it knew now.

    It is however quite another thing to claim the J-20 as some sort of dastardly plot to secretly develop a bomber. China has made no secret of its desire for a bomber to replace the H-6, for which the J-20 is clearly unsuited. If anything they should promote the J-20 as a strike fighter to distract attention from their other long range offensive programs.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2178574
    Multirole
    Participant

    Not sure what hidden offensive capability you’re referring to. It’s fair to say J-20 is not designed to be the most agile knife fighter technology permits (easier ways to point a missile than point the whole plane), but I wouldn’t place too much stock on analysis based on prototype photos. A ” few years ago” people erroneously thought it was as big as a F-111, turns out it’s a bit smaller than a Flanker with main bay similar in size to the F-22.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2179185
    Multirole
    Participant

    If we add Indian Navy and Coast Guard we’ll get 50+ airframes. I’m not sure what the point is.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2179550
    Multirole
    Participant

    This isn’t the 1970s, where air superiority fighters and interceptors were entirely different concepts. We live in an age where almost all kills are BVR and the last gun kill happened almost 30 years ago. The J-20 is specified as a “super maneuverable” fighter so it can take care of business if it has to, but more importantly it has superior range than American 5th gen fighters so it can push back the tankers they need to reach China. The Raptor was designed for the more geographically compact European theater and a time when they were hedging their bets between BVR and WVR.

    in reply to: PLAN News Thread #4 #2022623
    Multirole
    Participant

    The first 12,000 ton cutter has gone on its sea trial 🙂

    What’s the name of this class? From what I read it has a 76mm gun, I’m surprised it’s not bigger.

    Multirole
    Participant

    The Israelis and the Jordanians would probably use aid too

    Pakistan is already getting more aid than Congress is willing to give. Just look how long it took to authorize the AH-1Z, and Pakistan will probably want those delivered before even thinking about the A-10.

    Israel neither want nor need the A-10.

    Multirole
    Participant

    Maybe the Jordanians. Iraq market is cornered by Frogfoots, the Pakistanis will probably ask for subsidies. The Saudis tend to go for sexy fast movers.

    in reply to: What happened to Russia mil aviation? #2183485
    Multirole
    Participant

    Now that Putin and Xi Jinping are bros maybe Russia will join the J-31 project. Should be a global best seller with this tie up. Plus Shenyang has a long standing working relationship with the Russians.

    Multirole
    Participant

    Rooivalk is dead AFAIK. Denel didn’t even offer it to Nigeria and Kenya where they are sorely in need of attack helicopters.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 761 total)