Typhoon, Rafale, Gripen NG are not and never will be fully 5th generation fighter because their platform is not and there are no amount of upgrade that will change that. Silent Eagle or Silent Hornet will no more be 5th Gen anyday soon. IMO Pak-Fa and J-20 are going to be a little better than a possible Silent Hornet: close to 5th Gen. Russia is beleived to be 20 to 30 years late in many area of technology which is why they have decided to buy some western equipment as part of their modernisation effort (DCN’s BPC, Thales’s infrared sensor and communication suite, Israeli UAV etc…). China still need Russia’s help in many advanced area so the day is still in the future when China’s products are going to be anything but copy.
It’s a arm race’s principle that if your neighbour says that he has a 5th Gen fighter you need to say you have one too. It’s going to be a long time for Russia and China to have capable and fully mature 5 Gen which is why Russia is planning to buy quite a lot of SU-35 and China is just introducing the J-17.
Uh China is not introducing the JF-17, that’s the Pakistanis. Russia is now sourcing defence electronics from Chinese contractors as well. Certainly there are areas China can continue to learn from Russia, but the days when everything Chinese is a copy is over.
Regarding China’s J-20 and its export my opinion is that china will surely look to sell the J-20 to its allies for various reasons such as to expand its strategic and miltary alliances , to push through diplomacy and trade and to ofcourse to bring sales to its first 5th gen fighter. Even though china will aquire it in numbers it always of strategic importance to have others operating your stuff..
Expanding military alliances entail enormous costs that I’m not sure China wants or needs to underwrite. The Soviet Union spent massively maintaining unsustainable alliances. US got bogged down in Middle East politics, was attacked by Islamic radicals, and squandered it’s unilateral moment with costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan due to alliance entaglements. It’s relationship with China is much rockier than it need be because of commitments to Taiwan a generation earlier.
We can go back earlier and see how far Germany’s attempt to build alliances with Italy and Japan got them. Not to say allies don’t have their uses, but as a condition to being a great power, old fashioned alliances are greatly over-hyped.
No I don’t think China view the American and Soviet model of alliance building as success stories or something to emulate.
More fan art.

No, you deliver a better product through competition.
It doesn’t follow you then have to sell it.
If, China wants to be a Super Power. It will have to match the US, Russia, and even India on the same level. It’s my opinion it can only do so my competing on every level. Especially, Military Hardware……:cool:
You mean it also has to invade Afghanistan? :dev2:
Russia selling PAK-FA doesn’t exactly put it in the same league as the USA does it?
There is always the problem of knowing how far something is from the aircraft: with people on top of it, it becames easier; let’s keep on with the measurings 🙂
Why? We have no idea how tall those individuals are, nor whether they have good posture.
We will have to disagree………..Advance Technology and Manufacturing is the name of the game. With Automotive, Electronics, and Defense Sectors leading the way.
Actually I don’t disagree. The defense sector is important to Chinese industry. It’s just that it has no need to export it’s best wares to fund it’s military industrial complex.
If, China is looking to compete with the other Major Powers. It must compete and you can only do that my exporting your wares.
The reason the Russians and Americans sell advanced warplanes is primarily to keep their own downsizing industries alive, to crush indigenous competitors, and to dole out rewards to maintain alliances.
China doesn’t need to do any of these things. Selling fighter jets have nothing to do with China’s plan to become an industrialized superpower. China can become that by dominating the markets for cars, trains, green technology, etc and using its wealth to become the world’s banker. That’s where the real action is. Your banker doesn’t need to ply you with bread and circus.
I don’t see why China should want to sell this thing. It’s not like they need the foreign currency to fund the project. What do they gain that could possibly justify the risk of it being examined by people they don’t want?
China built the JXX to give it an ace up it’s sleeve, just as the US intends to keep the F-22 close to it’s vest. I’m sure some countries will be very interested if China offered, but that’s not likely for a very long time.
Unfortunately we don’t know the actual length of the J-10 either. Eyeing it relative to the Flanker and J-10, I’m convinced JXX < 22.0 meters.
New pic
It doesn’t look oversized compared with the J-10s. Might even be a bit shorter than a Flanker.
You know that China is Iran’s best ally and Iran would gladly sell the Chinese every drop of oil it can pump. And Chinese tankers carrying Iranian oil back to China would be allowed to pass unscathed. Meanwhile, the Iranians continue their embargo as a way to destroy the finances of the Sunni enemy (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE). That Europe’s economy would be harmed is a secondary but real effect.
I call BS. According to diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks the Chinese were cooperative with Iranian sanctions and very much concerned by Iranian intentions. Why should anyone be surprised? China buys way more oil from Saudi Arabia and the other Sunni Gulf states than Iran, and it’s to those suppliers China goes hat in hand.
I would be cautious claiming this, because such big weapon’s bay so far away from the center of the main wing would be troublesome for it handling and aerodynamic balance, IMO it bomb bay won’t be that big, so probably is not a striker, just a heavy fighter, or interceptor.
Or probably is a striker 😀
It also have lifting canards, so the center of lift is forward of the center of it’s main wings. The weapons bays are likely between the landing gears. Also since the fuselage, intake and engine arrangement is reminescent of the F-22, I’d wager it has F-22 like weapons bays. One large bay under the body and two on the sides.
My guess is the main bay, if based on a scaled up F-22 bay, should be big enough to carry 6 PL-21, or 2 PL-21 and 2 1,000 Kg JDAM class bombs, or 4 500 Kg bombs. The side bays could hold 1 PL-21 and 1 PL-10 each.
When the F-22 was designed, it had to be a good dogfighter with a gun no less because the brass didn’t want to take the chance that visual range engagements are a thing of the past. Since then the lesson learned is that indeed BVR does seem to be as it’s hyped up to be. The F-22 never had to engage a legacy fighter in dogfight unless it wanted to. Furthermore F-22 pilots complain that they would be even more dominant with greater internal missile loads.
It then seems quite logical to design the JXX as a bigger missile ship than the F-22. It’s internal bays are probably designed with larger next generation ramjet missles like the the PL-21 in mind, rather than limited to petite missiles like the AMRAAM.
It also makes perfect sense to design the JXX as a strike fighter since China doesn’t have a JSF or B-2 to carry out the bomb role. JXX is not a specialized air supremacy fighter like the F-22. It is most likely a true multirole fighter. Capable of carrying larger and more numerous air-to-air missiles, as well as having a super F-35 role.
Having an all in one capability makes sense for two reasons. One being a common platform would be cheaper. Had China gone for a F-22 like specialist they may not be able to afford to build a significant number. Second, as a Flanker operator, PLAAF is already used to having a large fighter with multi-mission capability. JXX is designed to replace the multirole Flankers, just as the F-22 is designed to replace the pure air supremacy F-15C.