dark light

Multirole

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: J-10's for Pakistan? #2628045
    Multirole
    Participant

    I thought Hong Kong was China. 😀

    in reply to: found in a Boeing product. #2639329
    Multirole
    Participant

    Reminds me of the 80’s movie “Deal of the Century”. The corporate boss was talking about these two warring African tribes who bought their fighter jets with new found oil wealth. The two sides would face each other across a valley, and push the jets to crash into eachother. :dev2:

    in reply to: China looking to buy heavy lift transports #2639640
    Multirole
    Participant

    Shouldn’t China first build up a tactical capability before acquiring a strategic capability? It could be interesting for China to build the An-70. Buying An-124 would be more of a symbolic move.

    My guess is China is not interested in the An-124’s range, rather the capability to lift a tank or two from one end of the country to another, or a short hop over water for that matter. The An-70 has a max cago capacity of exactly 47tons. That’s cutting it a little too close, their latest tanks are 50tons.

    For strategic lift, I don’t know if the Chinese have any tanker for something that thirsty.

    in reply to: China looking to buy heavy lift transports #2639784
    Multirole
    Participant

    Forget An-225 (unless to transport space module), An-124 with 777 engines would be quite impressive.

    What China, Russia and Ukraine need is somethings like a C-17. Perhaps they can develop something new instead of keep building older designs.

    in reply to: Israelis beat American pilots 220 out of 240 engagements #2640264
    Multirole
    Participant

    It is one thing to be skeptical of US “loss” in simulation against an opponent, however, in the Israeli case, they only recently had similar results against the German airforce in WVR wargames. There is a consistant pattern of Israeli prowess in the air that should not be dismissed as simply propaganda.

    I seem to recall the Germans claimed the Israelis held a decisive advantage with their off bore-sight helmet display system and the Python-4, plus some other electronic gizmos the Israelis put into their aircrafts.

    in reply to: Israelis beat American pilots 220 out of 240 engagements #2640763
    Multirole
    Participant

    You guys need to read the article first.

    This points to two divergent concepts for future arial warfare. Americans favor BVR, Israelis prefer dogfights. You can claim the superiority of BVR over close range in theory, but the Israelis have drawn an opposite conclusion based on their experience. No one should be suggesting the Israelis lack “total package experience” as they were the pioneers of AWAC operations. There are things Israeli AWACs can do a USAF E-3 can’t. The Israelis seem to perfer AWACs vectoring dogfighters and decoys instead of AWACs vectoring in BVR interceptors.

    The problem with relying on BVR is all air to air missiles can be fooled or outmanuevered at extreme range. The Israelis at least seem convinced extreme manueverability remains a decisive factor in air combat.

    in reply to: Israelis beat American pilots 220 out of 240 engagements #2640836
    Multirole
    Participant

    Interesting observation Shadow1. But what makes these Israeli pilots so much better? Afterall, Israel has not fought any major airforces recently. For the last several decades they have been dropping bombs on terrorist hideouts, not essentially different than the task given to USAF these days.

    in reply to: China's second LACM #2057218
    Multirole
    Participant

    Maybe Sarge defected over and married a Japanese woman. :diablo:

    The forward swept wings on the ALCM is a dead giveaway it exist only in some amature’s fantasy. Nobody is going to make a cruise missile that technologically challenging.

    in reply to: Hypothetical Iranian kamakazi attack on carrier group #2071717
    Multirole
    Participant

    Iran does not have nukes. Even if they did they wouldn’t waste them by letting them drift in the ocean.

    The idea really is what Iran might do to attack an invasion force. Attacking the Panama Cannel, with or without a carrier group in the locks is not immediatly helpful to Iran.

    in reply to: Hypothetical Iranian kamakazi attack on carrier group #2072463
    Multirole
    Participant

    I think the radar can “burn” through jamming as the distance between jammer and radar is reduced. I must admit that I haven’t seen this any other places than in techno thrillers, but it sounds likely. Hope someone can confirm this.

    The radar on a jet might burn through, I rather doubt an AMRAAM has the power.

    in reply to: Hypothetical Iranian kamakazi attack on carrier group #2072473
    Multirole
    Participant

    If you think US Naval ships aren’t at a high state of readiness when they enter the Gulf, you would be wrong.

    This idea just won’t work. Option one-use jamming and fly at low level. AEGIS detects the jamming source. Alert fighters are airborne inside of 5 minutes and find a 747. Iran looses one 747. Option 2-the “mimic the airline” idea. Flight schedules and routes are common knowledge to radar operators in the area. If you’re flying without a transponder code, you’ll be investigated. If you try the “we have an emergency” route, you’ll be investigated. I just don’t see this ever working, especially after 9/11.

    AEGIS can find the planes no problem, but how does it shoot down a jammer aircraft? Can a SAM home on jam? Can AMRAAM home on jam? Alert fighters will have to get close and hope their IR AAMs don’t get decoyed. If that don’t work they go to guns. I don’t know how long it takes to rip apart a 747 with 20mm guns, but chances are they’d run out of time. Actually this is what happened in my story.

    Think of the attack in three stages. Stage one is to sneak in as close as possible without being detected. Stage two is to fire missiles to keep the defender busy, meanwhile use jamming to prevent missile lock. Stage three is just to crash through the final line of defense with four really big planes.

    BTW I looked it up on FAS Iranian airforce has 4 747F (freighters) and 30 Su-24MKs, which is why I assembled this force.

    in reply to: Cruise missile that truns into Torpedo? #2058041
    Multirole
    Participant

    The real trick is to get past the missile defense. CWIS is not a reliable missile stopper anyways, if you can fire enough weapons to overwhelm the missiles you might as well overwhelm the CWIS by firing a few more.

    So to be effective you need to dive in the water outside the effective intercept radius of the SAMs. That is a long swim.

    What I think would be a real scary antiship weapon is basically air deployable semisubmersible robots. Once you have the enemy fleet located, you map out a “kill box” slightly larger than the range of enemy SAMS. Your bombers rapidly encircle the box, drop the robots and and point them toward the center of the box. Each robot then zig-zag into the perimeter scanning with radar at snorkel. When it sees something it fires a torpedo at it and radio back the contact.

    in reply to: India vs China's navy. Which one is better? #2075725
    Multirole
    Participant

    The Chinese navy’s original role is to defend the coastline and the South China Sea islands. In that role it was never adaquet. It’s new mission is to project power around Taiwan. In that role it is totally inadaquet. The fleet is going through a build up right now, but nothing like the build up the Soviets or Americans had in the Cold War. From the way it looks right now it is unknown if PLAN can ever beef up enough to carry out its mission.

    India on the other hand is surrounded by weak navies. It’s primary mission is to shutdown Pakistani ports in the event of war. In this role it has proven effective in the past. In the future India would want projection to the Strait of Malacca, the Persian Gulf, and access to the Red Sea. They are on their way.

    In summary the Indian navy is doing a much better job fulfilling the mandates of its mission. They are totally different missions from the Chinese navy. I’m not sure what could be gained from comparing their order of battle as they are not direct competitors.

    in reply to: Luxurious $75 million Yacht cum sub #2075745
    Multirole
    Participant

    It would take a lot of naval ship wreck fans to buy a lot of tickets to make this profitable.

    in reply to: Luxurious $75 million Yacht cum sub #2075857
    Multirole
    Participant

    You can raise $78 million dollars?

    Tell me your idea. It doesn’t involve smuggling does it? 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 761 total)