dark light

Multirole

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Greatest strength greatest weakness #2139667
    Multirole
    Participant

    You act like that’s a bad thing? Planned obsolescence is the capitalist cornerstone. What was said about the Soviets during the cold war? If we didn’t have the Russians, we’d have to invent them.

    I doubt anyone said that during the Cuban Missile Crisis. War can make you rich, unless it gets you killed.

    in reply to: Greatest strength greatest weakness #2139715
    Multirole
    Participant

    US greatest weakness is procurement based on need for defense corporations to keep making money rather than actual requirement, resulting in unecessary push for technological overmatch that is not always strategically sound. It’s structural problems of industry plus ‘allies’ lobbying for weapons exports means American R&D is effectively being used to hasten the obsolescence of its own legacy systems.

    Of course US is not the only party guilty of this. It was the British that sold the Soviets the RR Nene.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2140232
    Multirole
    Participant

    Recommend we create a great thread of butt-hurts and move these posts over there.

    in reply to: U-2: why no imitators? #2147539
    Multirole
    Participant

    Generally, needs drive programs!

    I’m also thinking, maybe other US allies never had a need for their own U-2 programs because the US was filling that niche, with allies becoming dependent on US providing that type of intelligence support. Perhaps one of the U-2’s unsung roles is being that carrot given to allies for supporting American agendas, much like military and financial aid but one which was discrete and without Congressional limitations.

    IIRC, when Kissinger went to China the first time he gave them a detailed briefing of Soviet forces on their border, with the aim of impressing them of what American intelligence gathering capabilities had to offer. The Chinese were thoroughly impressed.

    The fact that the Soviets had less to offer their allies in the form of materiel as well as intelligence support certainly contributed to their alliance problems.

    in reply to: U-2: why no imitators? #2150288
    Multirole
    Participant

    It seems the Soviets attempted a virtual bolt for bolt copy of the U-2 but failed to do so due to overweight subsystems. They even tried to copy the J75 engine. Not sure why since Soviet engines like the Mikulin AM-3 seemed comparable on paper. They probably believed improvements in SAM would render it obsolete, not appreciating its growth potential.

    As for other powers, perhaps the high cost, low production run of this type was the main barrier. Few had any need for specialized equipment like space suits. Only 104 U-2s were ever built and the Soviets built less than 10 M-55 in all variants.

    Soviet U-2 copy:

    http://www.ussr-airspace.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=28_39_38_108&products_id=1510

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2151026
    Multirole
    Participant

    U2 sensors and the Global Hawk. Wild horses couldn’t drag them away…

    Northrop to flight test U-2 Optical Bar Camera in September

    Hard to understand why the Global Hawk program didn’t specify at least comparable service ceiling, payload and sensors as the U-2 to begin with. There’s only so much you can do with a UAV with 20,000 ft lower altitude, half internal volume, 3/5th payload and engine power.

    in reply to: Rise of the 6th Generation Fighter … #2152813
    Multirole
    Participant

    What F-15s forever?

    in reply to: Rise of the 6th Generation Fighter … #2153779
    Multirole
    Participant

    Still sounds like B-21s with freakin lasers on their heads to me.

    in reply to: Yeager says F-22 and the F-35 are a waste of money #2155592
    Multirole
    Participant

    Yeager’s comment makes a certain amount of sense in that both the J-20 and T-50 were reactions to the F-22 and F-35 that wouldn’t exist otherwise. Had the US not radically shifted the game the world would’ve been content building 4++ gen fighters for decades more. Instead a lot of money has been spent to kill the 4th gen fighters, creating an uncertain future with the sole benefit of relatively short term over-kill advantage when US already enjoyed lopsided advantage.

    In the longer term, these disruptive innovations may provide the tools to threaten the status quo of American air supremacy. Even a small number of 5th gen fighters in the hands of say Iran would require asymetric spending by status quo powers to maintain the balance.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2163871
    Multirole
    Participant

    With J-20 already in LRIP, maybe he means Chinese help would’ve moved the T-50 project ahead faster. But then why would China want to help IAF with earleir T-50 deliveries?

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2167887
    Multirole
    Participant

    Not sure how to separate airpower and information technology topics.

    China’s new satellite to test quantum cryptography communication:

    China on Tuesday launched the world’s first quantum satellite, which will help it establish “hack-proof” communications between space and the ground, state media said, the latest advance in an ambitious space program.

    The program is a priority as President Xi Jinping has urged China to establish itself as a space power, and apart from its civilian ambitions, it has tested anti-satellite missiles.

    The Quantum Experiments at Space Scale, or QUESS, satellite, was launched from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre in the remote northwestern province of Gansu in the early hours of Tuesday, the official Xinhua news agency said.

    “In its two-year mission, QUESS is designed to establish ‘hack-proof’ quantum communications by transmitting uncrackable keys from space to the ground,” it said.

    “Quantum communication boasts ultra-high security as a quantum photon can neither be separated nor duplicated,” it added. “It is hence impossible to wiretap, intercept or crack the information transmitted through it.”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-space-satellite-idUSKCN10R07J

    Multirole
    Participant

    Turkey is not leaving NATO. So long as Erdogan patch things up with Putin, NATO will need Turkish bases more than it needs NATO security guarantees. Having the two pilots responsible for the Su-24 shootdown arrested with insinuation that they did it to harm Russo-Turkish relations at behest of “foreign interest” was amusingly knavish.

    Having said that it would be nuts for US to sell them F-35s, but I wouldn’t put money on a sane Turkish policy. I’m sure somewhere there’s a J-31 salesman studying up on Turkish just in case.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2196060
    Multirole
    Participant

    With the Turkish relationship strained, wouldn’t be surprised those F-35 sales never materialize. Can’t afford a repeat of the Iranian F-14 fiasco.

    in reply to: Vietnamese Air Force #2160882
    Multirole
    Participant

    correction. it is not Russia reliance but China reliance on Russia that is growing. If I am reading twitter correctly with in two to three years Russia will be able to completely block all energy supplies from Middleast and Africa. and can successfully implement complete no fly zone for Air
    traffic among EU/China/Middleast. that’s why Persian Gulf and Israel doing separate bargaining with Russia and Russia Eurobond sales can succeed even with sanctions.
    China weak political & economic system , dysfunctional R&D simply cannot allow it be leader.

    Wow. You and Fedaykin really make this thread entertaining.

    in reply to: Vietnamese Air Force #2161081
    Multirole
    Participant

    Why only F-16’s? For political reasons (wants to please USA)? Cost of frames + upgrade cost + support is lower than Gripen C 0r FA-50?

    Sure Vietnam’s after American training, military relationship, and of course for political reasons. USA may not do anything for them in a shooting war, but at least it’s got more clout than the Swedes and Koreans.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 761 total)