dark light

Multirole

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2167119
    Multirole
    Participant

    Apparently it’s a great scandal and conspiracy that Pakistan is not one of the 3 or 4 countries with fully indigenous fighter programs.

    in reply to: Ukraine / Russia dispute aviation thread #2167187
    Multirole
    Participant

    Certainly, but what could justify a policy that turned Ukraine into a place where only some parts of the country don’t hate Russia? At the end of the day Russia has paid a ridiculous price to keep Ukraine out of Nato, which was probably never more than a fantasy to begin with and could have been waylaid by far easier means.

    in reply to: Ukraine / Russia dispute aviation thread #2167209
    Multirole
    Participant

    I just came back from my first visit to Ukraine. It is simply the most anti-Russian place in the world right now. If Russians think a protracted conflict is in their interest I don’t know what is going through their heads. If the plan is to ruin Ukraine’s economy, you only need to look at how poor and small that country is to realize it doesn’t take much to build it back up.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2167218
    Multirole
    Participant

    Question though is how much of that Mirage fleet is even serviceable today? And would PAF not have been better off investing in the more capable J-10? At the end of the day, its assembling the JF-17 locally from Chinese kits with some local input in airframe and other assembly to pick up over time. They could have done the same for the J-10 and a 100+ J-10 fleet would have surely been a much better force.

    Are you familiar with the old sayings money doesn’t grow on trees and a bird in the hand is better than two in the bush?

    100 “not a pound for air to ground” J-10 would pay for 140 multirole JF-17. Going for J-10s would force PAF to keep those vastly less capable Mirages in service for ground attack. Not to mention there was no spare J-10 production in the 2000s so they’d have to wait even longer. Finally China was willing to cut Pakistan in on a piece of the action if they find export customers. What is so hard to understand?

    in reply to: Japanese Stealth Fighter ADX Thread! #2174345
    Multirole
    Participant

    http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/ii120/Duggy009/a%20and%20a%20two/X-2-first%20flight-1.jpg
    A nice looking machine.

    Where are the weapons bays? Its not clear to me where the bays would go even if production aircraft is 25% bigger.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2189874
    Multirole
    Participant

    You’d think it would include enhancements found on the crashed sample in Abbottabad.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2191825
    Multirole
    Participant

    The UN just adopted a resolution that bans a number of exports to North Korea, including all forms of jet fuel and mandates inspection of all shipment to the country for contraband. Does that mean their air force is going to be all piston based soon? It’s going to be impossible to operate even their airliners. 😀

    in reply to: US Air Force Unveils New B-21 Bomber #2193869
    Multirole
    Participant

    Regarding the configuration, any guesses to why Northrop didn’t use the cranked kite wing they favored for the X-47B as well as their NGB proposal?

    in reply to: US Air Force Unveils New B-21 Bomber #2194521
    Multirole
    Participant

    It’s like Northrop ditched their NGB proposal and adopted Boeing’s instead.

    in reply to: Iranian air force future procurement #2195648
    Multirole
    Participant

    Given the fact that Russia only went into Syria when Iran convinced it to, not buying Russian would be a shocking turn. The political ties currently are stronger than with any other large power. Russia also was key in helping Iran through the nuclear deal mess.

    Also, in a recent interview the Iranian Minister of Defense Hossein Dedghan mentioned they were very interested in the Su-30 and are in the process of working out a deal. Not sure how that works with the whole nuclear deal, but maybe they will work over the next few years at setting up an assembly line (or realistically, local kit assembly) in Iran with deliveries starting in 2020.

    He also mentioned in the same interview Iran has no plans to acquire the J-10.

    I doubt China will sell any advanced combat aircraft to Iran. They have no incentive to take sides in this Shiite/Sunni war and they already have too many business interests tied up with the Gulf Arabs. But they’ll be happy to let Iranians in the store to have a look around. Maybe they’ll buy something else, an inoffensive AWACS for example. Besides it helps to remind the Saudis not to take China for granted.

    Russia is the natural partner for Iran since they share mutual enemies and Russia is not dependent on Saudi oil like China is.

    in reply to: Iranian air force future procurement #2196126
    Multirole
    Participant

    Iran received massive tech transfer from the US prior to the 1979 revolution and has used that industrial base to maintain and upgrade aircraft in service to the present day. In broader development terms Iran is light-years ahead of both Pakistan and India with higher HDI than China, Turkey, or Brazil — an impressive performance considering it has been achieved in spite of wide ranging sanctions/isolation from both the west and Arab neighbours.

    You mean they were ahead way back when Sony Betamax was state of the art. Today’s Iran could barely build F-5 variants. I’m not saying they’re not an intelligent people, but that has little correlation with the state of the defence sector. Of the countries in the top ten HDI, only three has any aircraft industry at all.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2196144
    Multirole
    Participant

    Why would WS-13 enter full production when there are no airplanes in production that will use that engine? Unless ones assumes China is going to start building FC-1s for itself, as J-31 is no where near its production and the PAF is content with RD-93s

    You’re assuming there are only two applications for WS-13. It’s probable there’s at least another project, possibly unmanned that this engine is slotted for. It’s also good to have an alternative to a Russian engine for many customers.

    in reply to: Iranian air force future procurement #2196255
    Multirole
    Participant

    From what I understand Iran cannot procure offensive system like Fighter Aircraft or other ( but only defensive system like SAM ) as per UNSC resolution and any procurement has to pass through UNSC members approving it and resolution is valid till 2020.

    That’s true, but it’s not like Iran can build anything in 5 years anyways. They’re way behind even India and Pakistan.

    in reply to: Iranian air force future procurement #2196583
    Multirole
    Participant

    Assuming Russo-Iranian relations continue to bloom for the next ten years, and the T-50 project prove successful, a deal is highly likely. But before that happens I would expect a lot of Flanker and Fulcrum sales. Russia may see this as a great opportunity to make Iran buy some MiG-35s, perhaps a big fat production license as pre-condition for other stuff Iran will want, like Su-35 and S-400.

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1787465
    Multirole
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 761 total)