dark light

pegon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 283 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2517417
    pegon
    Participant

    Which is why the USN has the worlds most powerful carrier fleet and a huge arsenal of cruise missiles.

    If you use only carrier a/, it will be a lot harder to overwhelm air defences.
    You cannot take out underground nuclear sites with cruise missiles, and the Iranians will be able to match your sortie rate, given that they fight in their own airspace.

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2517762
    pegon
    Participant

    The problem with airstrikes on Iran is that the USA arent in full control of Iraq.

    The best defense would be to use insurgents with manpads to target US fighters as they take off from Iraqi airfields.

    A victory is of course impossible, but an asymmetric strategy may make it cost prohibitive.

    in reply to: F-35 forced break for F-35 #2528807
    pegon
    Participant

    A lot has changed in Norway during the last year. The industrial package offered by SAAB to Norway, is seccond to none, and the real reason why Eurofighter pulled its bid.

    The f35 is still a real candidate, as Norway values its relations to USA greatly. SAAB offers the best deal by far, and has left the Eurofighter to the spot of an “allso ran”

    The most recent development in the saga, is that the Gripen is the loudest of the candidates, and the fighterbase in Bodø must be upgraded to the cost of a bilion euros, to handle noiserequirement issues.

    in reply to: F-35 forced break for F-35 #2529265
    pegon
    Participant

    It is hilarious how far the America-haters will bury themselves under their own BS to avoid being exposed to the real world.:rolleyes:

    To brand me as a America hater says more about your mental state, than my relations to americans.

    in reply to: F-35 forced break for F-35 #2529267
    pegon
    Participant

    The f35 is being designed to be as agile as the f16, do you really see the f16 outperforming the Eurofighter ?

    in reply to: F-35 forced break for F-35 #2529526
    pegon
    Participant

    You forget that the agility of the f22 is a result of thrust vectoring, rather than aerodynamics.

    As a fighter the f35 has to rely on stealth as its primary defence, as it has no chance at outmaneuvreing or outperform a 4,5 gen like the Eurofighter.

    The big question is then on how long it will take to develop sensors that detect stealth a/c at useful range.

    The day they do, the f35 will be obsolete as a fighter.

    in reply to: F-35 forced break for F-35 #2529885
    pegon
    Participant

    Its really to bad we have to go over and over on the price of the F-35. Clearly, it is not going to be anywhere near the $133 Million of the Raptor. Especially, considering the vast numbers projected…………Also, with the exception of the Raptor. No current generation fighter will even come close to its capabilities in Stealth, Performance, or Situational Awareness. :diablo:

    Performance ? Are we talking about the piglet here ?

    in reply to: Distiller's demand – UK get out of JSF! #2537976
    pegon
    Participant

    I was of course talking about a kill-to-loss ratio. (i.e. total kills vs total losses) For example the Hellcat during WWII shot down 19 Japanese aircraft for ever single Hellcat lost in Air Combat. That doesn’t mean the Hellcat shot down 19 in one engagement! During that period I “believe” nine was the most ever shot down during a single sortie. That said, I don’t know about the Germans vs the Russians on the Eastern Front? Regardless, the F-35 is easily capable of shooting down several Gripens with little concern for its own safety. Which, in modern jet combat is very remarkable…………:diablo: As for GCI Radars they would likely be destroyed by B-2’s, Cruise Missiles, or F-35’s before the Gripens got off the ground.;) Thereby making them of little help to the Gripens or any other type opposings them. Let’s not forget a strike package made up of F-22’s and F-35’s would also be supported by AWACS and Jammers. Sorry, its no contest anyway you look at it! 😉

    But by now you are not really talking about the F35 at all, are you ?

    in reply to: Distiller's demand – UK get out of JSF! #2538126
    pegon
    Participant

    So you have no commercial intrests in the Barent Sea f.e.? Neither the USA nor the UK may have any intrest to persue that for free. The P-3C-Su-27 incident and recent training-flights from the long-range-aviation do show, that some credibility in deterrence about that has to be kept. For the less exposed Europeans the F-35 is not in need really. But I give in for the deterrence purpose a small number of F-35 (~20) is enough, when the daily work is done by Gripen (~60).

    US and Royal Navy will have every interest, as they will be the prime targets for the North Fleet.

    If you look at the Norvegian fleet and the NSM, you will see that its built for littoral operation.

    The only exception beeing the Nansen, being built to slot into the Aegis systen.

    Fact is: For the price of the F35 we can get the same number of Gripen N + a new sub fleet, aswell as uppgrading our land based assets to deal with the PAK-FA.

    in reply to: Distiller's demand – UK get out of JSF! #2538256
    pegon
    Participant

    X4 may be the price you have to pay for having your air force as part of your foreign policy, and the F35 probably makes sense for USA, as the F35 will be better in the penetration role.

    The F16 is still a good aircraft for Norway and the reason we are phasing them out is purely because they are getting costly to maintain.

    When it comes to dealing with the North Fleet, we will leave it to USA and the UK, as we have no Blue water credibility.

    The 35, will probably be a great fighter for USA, but for the rest of us, it will simply be to much of what we dont need.

    in reply to: Distiller's demand – UK get out of JSF! #2538284
    pegon
    Participant

    The primary role of a gen 5 asset during the first 3 days of a hot war is to eliminate the enemy’s C4I. JSFs will not be tasked with “mano a mano” warfare with Gripens. JSF’s job is to use stealth to slip unnoticed past the DCA, maybe using an AMRAAM shot to mission kill the DCA, and then loft GBU-39s into the enemy’s C4I assets, killing them. The first victims of such an assault would include the GCI radars.

    A properly planned aerial assault will always be a one-sided affair with the attacker marshalling forces and concentrating them on a small sector of enemy defenses, overwhelming them. IOW, JSFs will not use “lone wolf” 1 v many tactics of WW1. You don’t fight one bean, you have to fight the whole burrito.

    With 4 times the number of Gripens, you have to fight 4 whole burritos. Remember what Comerade Stalin said: “Quantity has a certain quality all on its own”

    Who honestly believes the JSF will offer return on todays projected prices ?

    in reply to: F-16 for Morocco ? #2505416
    pegon
    Participant

    Cheap is the way to go for the F-16 in Morocco. No F-16 can match a SU-30, so its best selling point today is the strenght of the US-peso.

    in reply to: F-16 for Morocco ? #2505610
    pegon
    Participant

    Try to get my point guys !

    When you buy a new fighter, you are looking for something that will be valid for 20 years or more.

    As soon as USAF decided on the F-35, all developments on the F-16 were dead. So, even if the plane is good today, it will not get any better.

    The block 60 is allso beside the point, as it cost to much, and hardly on offer to Morocco

    in reply to: F-16 for Morocco ? #2505737
    pegon
    Participant

    I understand your admiration for the F-16, as it had a great past. However it has no future, as all developments on the platform has stopped long ago.

    The Rafale will at least see a number of developments that makes it a credible defence fighter in the longer term.

    in reply to: F-16 for Morocco ? #2505799
    pegon
    Participant

    Figures? Take a second hand C model and give it RANGR and it would probably come out alot cheaper than you think. Bare in mind that RANGR is basically the Shornets radar resized for whatever platform you choose so most of the development work is already done. Sure they wont get new build block-60s cheap but it should not be too expensive to do very well upgraded used C/D’s.

    While still being underdog to the SU-30…..

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 283 total)