The bombs carried by the Chadian PC-9s are Denel Mk81s.
http://www.denel.co.za/Landsystems/LS_LightOrdnanceAircraft.pdf
Don’t the A4s carry the AIM-9H?
A few fringe sales here and there (of 2nd hand equipment!) is not my definition of a hot market. After the G6 contracts for the Gulf States, sales for South African artillery more or less dried up.
What is a G8? I can’t find it on Denel’s website. (Given Land 17’s requirements of a SPH, probably a typo meaning the G6.)
Not to mention, they are the undisputed world leader in Long Range Artillery.
Which is great, safe for the fact that LR artillery is not exactly a hot market nowadays. :rolleyes:
Last summer we had a discussion about the RPG-29 in Lebanon in this thread and recently some new pictures of the weapon in this theater surfaced:
Captured by Israeli troops:


Quite a big weapon. Pictures from the Fresh.co.il boards: http://www.fresh.co.il/vBulletin/printthread.php?t=312949
They are still intrested to operate types used by friendly Arab neighbours too.
“Friendly” Arab neighbours? Get your inter-Arab politics straight; these countries and their rulers are a herd of cats occasionally pretending to show “unity” versus the outside world at one of their regular pompous conferences.
Cuba and Venezuela are basically backwaters with no real influence.
Cuba of course lost almost all of her influence with the demise of her main sponsor. However, I would not want to dismiss Chavez so easily as a mere thug. His proclamations about pan Latin American solidarity, his ill-defined “socialist” alternative and his rantings against the US “imperialists” seem to find a fertile ground amongst many groups in most Latin American countries. Although he backs up some of his rethoric with cheap oil, his main power is that of image, especially that of a successful resistor of the US, “capitalism” as a whole and its international institutions that have allegedly caused so much “harm” to Latin America.
Here, an op-ed in the NY Times today about why some Latin Americans like Chavez:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/17/opinion/17valenzuela.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Go for it MiG-23MLD, you almost sound like a European intellectuel de gauche; just Fisk it up a bit more. Haven’t you been asked yet to take a seat in the European Parliament, so that you may finally have a well-paid platform to spout forward your delusions about the socialist wave that will rid the world of the evil capitalistic imperialists? 😀
And a plan to buy 130 F35 JSF for Airforce and Navy
And you expect that ‘plan’ to materialize with Italy’s current budgetary situation and economic and demographic prospects?
Report: Missile system captured by Hizbullah, sent to Iran
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Monday, November 6, 2006
TEL AVIV — Hizbullah has captured an Israeli-origin advanced anti-tank guided missile system.
Israel state-owned television said an unidentified army unit left the launcher and missile in southern Lebanon, Middle East Newsline reported. The television said in a Nov. 3 report that Hizbullah found the Spike system and transferred it to Iran.
Israeli military sources said the Ground Forces Command has determined that Hizbullah seized the Spike anti-tank guided missile system. The sources said Hizbullah captured the Israeli system during the war in Lebanon in the summer of 2006.
“We know that one Gil [Spike] system has gone missing in an area where Hizbullah operated,” a source said.
The Spike was developed and produced by the state-owned Rafael, Israel Armament Development Authority. The system, sold to several countries, was widely used against Hizbullah in the 34-day war in Lebanon, which ended on Aug. 14.
“It obviously went to Iran,” Yoav Limor, the television’s military commentator, said.
The television report said Israel’s military has assessed that Iran would seek to reverse-engineer the Spike ATGM, with a range of four kilometers. Limor said this would allow Iran to develop counter-measures.
During the war, Hizbullah used Russian-origin anti-tank missiles obtained from Syria. They included the AT-14 Kornet missile, with a range of 5.5 kilometers.
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/06/front2454046.072222222.html
One of my friends is currently working on this ship:

Although it is a relatively new ship; they have had quite some trouble the last few months.
Here you can find the ship’s most recently reported position:
http://www.sailwx.info/shiptrack/shipposition.phtml?call=PHCQ
HMS King George V

Not actually sure myself. If I were designing it I would use the notch pin protruding from the top of the round to lock the round in with the potential to remove the round from the weapon if necessary.
Well, the round can indeed be removed when inserted, as shown in one of Kevin Sites’ reports:
A question about the RPG-7: when one inserts the PG-7 and its booster charge into the RPG-7 launcher, how does it remain in its position (i.e. not fall out when you point the launcher downwards)?