Still a bad bargain though. The ship is like Pamela Anderson; looks nice on the outside due to some paint on the rusty spots, but no content nor value inside.
What do you expect more from Yemen? To become a worldwide technological leader in terms of fighter aircraft? Why not judge F-16s according to Jordan Kingdom or Pakistan, then?
Perhaps succesful countries don’t really feel like MiG… they might be able to buy better things :rolleyes:
16 in total, 4 in each quadrant can be guided for terminal homing.
BTW about the Type 45, only in the terminal phase is the Aster missile reliant on its own radar, outside that phase it needs continuous updating from the ship.
this allows virtually unlimited simultaneous engagements
Nonsense! Here read from http://navy-matters.beedall.com/paams.htm
UK PAAMS can track approximately 2000 targets simultaneously and is able to engage up to 12, including 8 in local self-defence. All 48 Aster missiles are “ready to fire”, with just a few seconds elapsing from first autonomous detection of a target to the firing of the first Aster missile, and 8 Aster’s can be fired within 10 seconds. Up to 16 Aster missiles can be simultaneously guided in the air at once, making it difficult for attackers to swamp the ships air defence’s with saturating threats from aircraft and even supersonic missiles. Maximum theoretical range against aircraft is 100km although 80km is more usually quoted (a French senate report says PAAMS can intercept up to 70 km), against missiles the maximum range is 25km. The Aster missiles active seeker allows almost instant launching or further weapons or retargeting of in-flight missile once the target has been locked-up.
apart from ‘regeme change’, the only targets in iran worth the US risking all out war to attack is their nuclear facilities. and the point in that is to try ensure that no nuclear attack in carried out against CONUS. its a little counterproductive if the ‘per-emptive’ measure actually results in the outcome the US was trying to aviod in the first place dont u think?
You are messing up time lines here. While the satellite launch is imminent according to the article (and we aren’t even sure whether this will turn out to be succes), there are no reports up till now that Iran is indeed in the possession of nuclear bomb let alone a warhead that will fit onto the missile. All the reports say that Iran continued enriching uranium and nothing about its research coming into fruition in the form of a nuclear device. Even if the satellite launches succesfully in the short run; there’s probably still plenty of time for either military or political disruption of Iran’s nuclear program. So Iran is not in the position to blackmail the US and the ROTW yet.
So your reasoning is that one low orbit satellite makes you completely untouchable in every possible way?
Of course, that inherent to these kinds of situations. If you end up with politicians without any vision and not moral scrupulus (let alone apocalytic visions) making these tough decisions, you are (or your offspring will be) screwed over. Alas, these things went so often wrong. However, also sometimes right, like here in Diego Garcia. Certainly, some people were forced to make a sacrifice, but the majority profited from the establishment of this base and I think you have to keep that into consideration as well.
Diego Garcia is a sad indictment of how human beings are sometimes treated in the name of something “greater” – can anything be worth more than the health and happiness of a human being!
Yep, the well being of 300 million human beings. Sometime nasty things have to be done for the greater good. Regrettable, but that’s the way it is and it aint gonna change.
What do you think the regional and ideological ambitions are of the radical ruling the country?
BTW Have you seen the annual GDP growth of Venezuela (via worldbank http://devdata.worldbank.org/external/CPProfile.asp?SelectedCountry=VEN&CCODE=VEN&CNAME=Venezuela%2C+RB&PTYPE=CP)
1999: -6.1% $103.3 billion
2002: -8.9% $94.3 billion
2003: -9.2% $84.8 billion
And inflation of nearly 40% (GDP deflator) per annum.
If the madman keeping the country hostage currently is about as good in maintaining regional peace as he is in conducting a healthy economic policy, some ‘nice’ surprises are waiting for us in the near future.
And it could be argued that the risk today is _way_ worse. One should not forget that the president of France is now this Jacques Chirac, ie the man who made the decision to sell the A-bomb factory to Iraq to get bribes to finance his party. Without the IAF’s raid in June 1981, there would have been a problem.
I lately read somewhere that this factory couldn’t even produce weapons grade material and this stunt was more performed as an election stunt for the government at the time to boost patriotism among electors than to avoid a nuclear disaster.
And what’s this with betrayal? The only Mirages present at the time (October War) was a small number from Libya, which caused a lot of friendly fire cases among Arabs (and Israelis to paint yellow triangles on their planes). France just sold aircraft to generally everyone who wanted to take them, so what? Many other western countries don’t have a clean record either when it comes to selling weapons.
What is that big Dutch flag doing in the first picture? Will the Dutch navy dispatch a frigate to join the exercise? 😀
From one of the ACIG-articles:
The Libyans have ordered also huge amounts of spare parts for their Mirages, which enabled them to keep these operational until today: several independent reports confirmed that the LARAF was highly satisfied with Mirage F.1s and was also taking care about them much better than about Soviet-supplied MiGs and Sukhois.
Strange perhaps, but that machine makes me think of the Mad Max-movies. 😀
Will the Level 1, 2 and 3 partners get export versions???
Does anyone have a cockpit picture?
Are those displays green?