dark light

Vaiar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 265 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Photos : The Minsk World #2046915
    Vaiar
    Participant

    The theme park is already bankrupt.

    in reply to: Venezuelan AF to acquire SU-27? #2643870
    Vaiar
    Participant

    How reliable is this article? Or does it just describe one the usual bluffs of the incompetent fool destroying (oops ‘ruling’) the country?

    Vaiar
    Participant

    Be careful, the source is dubious and respectable press agencies haven’t reported it. :rolleyes:

    Vaiar
    Participant

    Some vague site reports the following alarming news:

    China builds submarine base near Malacca Straits
    China is building a submarine base on an Indonesian island close to the Malacca Straits. Australia has protested the submarine base plan, according to diplomatic sources. The base would be the first Chinese naval base outside China.

    Source: http://www.east-asia-intel.com/eai/

    Nice, Chinese subs in the straits 🙁

    in reply to: Soviet aircraft carriers #2048047
    Vaiar
    Participant

    Could that take off via Kuznetsov’s ski-jump with sufficient fuel for a patrol of sufficient duration?

    in reply to: Soviet aircraft carriers #2048237
    Vaiar
    Participant

    Here Scooter, a F/A-18E configured in the tanker role during Operation Iraqi Freedom in March 2003. I read it can carry more fuel in the tanker role than a S-3 as well.

    http://www.news.navy.mil/management/photodb/webphoto/web_030325-N-9593M-038.jpg

    in reply to: kongo2 class #2049221
    Vaiar
    Participant

    in what aspects are they weaker than USN ships? afaik their freeboard is one deck level lower, they lack the Tomahawk programming equipment and some redundant damage control features.

    GS says this (some structural issue):

    Construction was done to mercantile rather than military standards

    I also read somewhere this was done because of budget limits, but I forgot where.

    in reply to: Russian Navy eyes 2016 EIS for new carrier #2049224
    Vaiar
    Participant

    I wonder if the future internal political and economic constellation of Russia will permit such a project. :rolleyes:

    BTW what is the idea/requirement behind a new carrier? Do they plan to patrol the Northern Ice Sea with it or do they (realistically) want to use a single carrier to poke unfriendly regimes in the ass?

    Talwar made the following comment on the news at NCIG, it seems reasonable:

    They might build it, but the first set timeframe of 2017 seems a LOT more realistic. Nonetheless, if they do build it,they are having some errors. At this moment, all funding is going to submarines. Pantera is in repair, yet Sevmash says the degree of repair and upgrade depends on the funding of it. If that funding is so unsure, where are they going to get the money for new carriers?
    Secondly, they don’t have a wharf that is really fit for this at the moment, they don’t even have a wharf that has ever built a carrier!
    Third, if money is available, it would be smarter to get their sailors and officers paid (which happens quite unregular and unsufficient), get them food (regular sailors don’t get meat onboard, when you’re at sea that’s a real pain in the ass and quite demotivating) and a good accomodation when they are on land, most of their appartments hardly have heating. Same for bases and ships… (it would also keep the sailors from stealing parts of their own ships to sell)
    And of course, they are building corvettes and intend to build frigates in the future, that is not really sufficient to protect a carrier is it? There have been more plans for new aircraft and carriers, yet they haven’t come to materialisation. At this moment, funding is good, but will it stay like that for the future? In Russia this is a very unsure thing and the Admirals of course hope for this, yet are only dreaming of the “good old days”.
    At this moment they are building a lot of new ships, I hope they don’t make the same mistake USSR did, forgetting that maintaining these ships also costs money!

    (Since we do not see him around here anymore, I decided to post it here.)

    in reply to: kongo2 class #2049386
    Vaiar
    Participant

    Are these also being built to the weaker mercantile standards?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2050044
    Vaiar
    Participant

    Well, I can surely see the point of Indian pilots learning to land on a carrier (and closely eyeball anything happening on a US carrier), but what’s the point of learning to take off with a catapult when the Vikramaditya (and the ADSs assuming MiG-29Ks) will have a ski-jump?

    in reply to: THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEBATE #2050217
    Vaiar
    Participant

    OK, rather than go into a protracted debate, I’ll focus on Europe. To be quite honest, I’m not sure that any European nation needs anything bar helicopter carriers (i.e. for search-and-rescue/humanitarian operations). France, Italy and Spain might like to think of themselves as “great powers”, but to be perfectly honest I don’t see how they’re going to need carriers as fighter-platforms in the future. For one thing, they have established trade and energy land-routes. Equally I have a sense that continental Europe is “turtling” and is becoming less & less interested in overseas operations – I can’t see any of those three countries deploying their carriers against any plausible threat in the next 30+ years.

    You really don’t know France do you? Take a look at the site of the French ministry of defense and see where their troops operate: worldwide and there does not seem to be a trend away from it (actually the reverse for the EU as a whole). Read the papers, follow the news and see how France manifests itself on the world stage: elle pense qu’elle est importante, n’est-ce pas?

    Also, I never heard about Spain or Italy having any grand power ambitions, except protecting their territory and participating in peace missions. Furthermore, there ‘s quite a difference between a CdG-type carrier and a small Harrier carrying amphibious assault ship.

    in reply to: THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEBATE #2050498
    Vaiar
    Participant

    The netherlands and Ireland are both thinking of LHD’s.

    With the current cutbacks in the Dutch defence budget, I really don’t see them going ahead with such a plan, though it would be nice, especially if they keep up with their work on the UN front.

    Aside from the cutbacks, you can trust me as a Dutchman that they would never ever get the acquisition of anything even resembling an aircraft carrier through parlement. There is an aviation enthousiast in parlement, a certain Mr Herben, and he recently argued for the acquisition of two aircraft carriers, but was ridiculed as the MPs regard aircraft carriers (even so small) as something for countries suffering seriously from megalomania that prefer brute force to the rule of international law.

    in reply to: Singapore say No to Eurofighter!!! #2614382
    Vaiar
    Participant

    I think that really differs per customer (and the competition) and the price can of course be negotiated about. You probably would need access to the parties involved in this procurement program to get more details about the precise packages of on offer an their prices.

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2617726
    Vaiar
    Participant

    Even the dutch were ill prepared to intervine at Serbrenia in an appropriate way.

    Hé, hé, don’t step on our long Dutch toes!! The Dutch armed forces had enough equipment at home that could have been used if it only were allowed to be used by the UN mandate of the time. The heaviest weapons the Dutch airborne troops were allowed to take with them were 12.7 mm HMGs!!! Together with those freaking blue helmets and vehicles painted white out of complete lunacy!!!
    Yes indeed we could see the Serb forces on tv moving to the region and nothing happened to stop them (or reinforce the Dutch credibly), except hollow threats to the Serbs and continued negotiations to have them back off. (Oh yeah and a 2 ship air raid in which one serb vehicle was destroyed)
    Furthermore, disastrous functioning of the UN, military hierarchy, naive politicians at home and a weak commander of the Dutch detachment more than assured a horrible disaster.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2054897
    Vaiar
    Participant

    The former AG will carry 16 MiG-29K, according to the Navy chief Admiral Arun Prakash, see below. Furthermore, interesting news is that the smaller ADS will carry 12 MiG-29K.

    The Times of India

    Navy’s air arm flies high with fighters
    RAJAT PANDIT

    TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ FRIDAY, APRIL 08, 2005 12:42:33 AM ]
    Sign into earnIndiatimes points
    NEW DELHI: The Navy’s aging air arm is finally getting its much-needed booster dose. That Navy chief Admiral Arun Prakash is himself an aviator has only helped in administering the right medicine to bolster the force’s air power.

    The Navy has now embarked on a mix of mid-life upgrades, planned inductions and new acquisitions of aircraft to emerge as “a true three-dimensional blue-water force”, capable of furthering India’s “political and geo-strategic objectives”.

    First, the Navy is going in for upgradation of old warhorses like Sea Harrier jump-jet fighters and IL-38 long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft, Kamov-28 and Sea King anti-submarine warfare helicopters.

    The Cabinet Committee on Security last week approved upgradation of 14 Sea Harriers, inducted in 1983, which are deployed on the country’s sole aircraft carrier INS Viraat. The Rs 476-crore upgradation package will include Israeli Elta EL/M-2032 multi-mode fire control radar and Derby beyond visual range air-to-air missiles for the fighters.

    “India and Israel have agreed for a $25 million deal for the Derby missiles. The upgradation package will also include indigenously-developed Electronic Counter-Measures systems,” said an officer.

    The new inductions, in turn, include 10 Advanced Light helicopters (six in utility version and four for anti-submarine warfare) and two IL-38s to replace the two lost in the mid-air collision at the Dabolim naval airbase in 2002.

    Then, of course, there are the 28 Russian MiG-29Ks, which will provide fleet air defence with an anti-warship and reconnaissance role, and six Kamov-31 helicopters for early-warning and anti-submarine missions.

    “Sixteen MiG-29Ks will be for INS Vikramditya or Admiral Gorshkov when it’s inducted in end-2008, while the other 12 are for the indigenous Air Defence Ship expected in 2012,” he said.

    The government has also given the nod for the Rs 726-crore acquisition of 11 more Dornier-228s, with spare engines, which will act as medium-range maritime reconnaissance and patrol aircraft.

    The Navy is also negotiating with United States to buy eight P-3C Orions for long-range reconnaissance capabilities. These aircraft, to be acquired from the US Navy’s inventory or storage reserves, may together cost around $900 million with the upgradation package and initial product support.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1071981.cms

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 265 total)