dark light

Pit

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 489 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New MiG-35 (in flight) photos #2515651
    Pit
    Participant

    T-50 will be 30-33% composites.

    in reply to: booklet 279 okiap Severomorsk-3 #2066482
    Pit
    Participant

    Dear Friend, the link don’t work 🙁

    Will love to read that booklet

    Bolshoi’ Spasibo!

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Nov-Dec 06 #2515914
    Pit
    Participant

    😡 😡 Bravo Sierra Warning Alert:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

    in reply to: PAK-FA image leak at Aero India '07 (?) #2516246
    Pit
    Participant

    Hey Stealth Spy is any chance for you to scan that Phaza booklet?

    Would really apreciate it!!!!!!!

    in reply to: US SEAD/EW MISSION TOPIC #3 #2517046
    Pit
    Participant

    Djcross so Albino Eagles on USAF service never get LO treatment?

    That’s fantastic information!:o

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Nov-Dec 06 #2517653
    Pit
    Participant

    Apparently some engineering work is on progress to make the Hawk a/c for IAF capable of using a selected range of A-A and A-G weapons in a light combat role. since it doesnt have a radar, one would assume infra-red AAMs, Litening pod, and PGM kits. I am sure as a AJT it already has CCIP for dumb munitions and rocket pods.
    another possibility could be external cannon pods and ATGMs for CAS or anti tank/anti helicopter role.

    For a CCIP mode I think you need a ranging device for getting slant-range info. At least, that’s how it works in F-16A.

    Remind other non-radar equipped strike aircrafts has laser range finder and the like…

    in reply to: Iran successfully tests Russian TOR-M1 missiles #2517760
    Pit
    Participant

    No way in hell that Tor-M1(wathever) could engage at the same time 8 targets. Tor uses CLOS guidance with optical guidance backup…how did you form 8 different CLOS signals using a single tracking and fire control radar?…that’s beyond me.

    Tor-M1A:

    New software boosts Tor-M1 performance

    Miroslav Gyürösi Russian joint-stock company OAO NIEMI (Otkritoye Aktsionernoye Obschestvo Naucsno-Issledovatelskiy Elektromekhanicseskiy Institut = Public joint-stock company scientific-research electromechanical institute) has developed an upgrade for the Tor-M1 (SA-15 ‘Gauntlet’) air-defence missile system, writes Miroslav Gyürösi. The organisation is part of the Almaz-Antey joint-stock company, a group of 34 Russian companies specialising in the development and production of air-defence systems.

    The upgraded system is named Tor-M1A and the improved combat vehicle is designated 9A331-1A. It is intended to offer improved high-altitude coverage and a longer range against crossing targets (aircraft or missiles that are not directly approaching the SAM unit, but flying past it en route to another target). Combat ceiling has been improved by about 50%, while the range against crossing targets is increased by 33%.
    This additional capability does not require changes to the missile or
    modifications to the vehicle hardware. It has been obtained by new software. This adds new signal-filtering techniques, new launch-preparation and allow routines, and improved algorithms giving better performance against manoeuvring targets. These changes are intended to improve the system’s performance in areas judged lacking following Russian evaluation of the NATO air raids conducted over the former Yugoslavia in 1999. The retrofit package has been accepted for use by Russian Army Tor units.

    Being a software change, it can be carried out during normal service
    maintenance at the user’s base workshops.
    Performance improvements – Tor-M1 to TorM1A
    System designation Tor-M1 Tor-M1A
    Combat vehicle 9A331-1 (original) 9A331-1A (upgraded)
    Against targets flying at up to 300m/s:
    – max. altitude 10-6,000m 10-9,000m
    – max. range 1,000-12,000m 1,000-12,000m
    – max. crossing range up to 6,000m up to 8,000m
    Against targets flying at up to 600m/s:
    – max. altitude 10-6,000m 10-7,000m
    – max. range up to 12,000m up to 12,000m
    – max. crossing range up to 6,000m up to 7,000m
    Against cruise missiles and UAVs
    (with RCS of more than 0.1m² and a speed of up to 700m/s):

    – max. altitude 50-6000m 50-6,000m
    – max. range 1,500-7,000m 1,500-7,000m
    – max. crossing range up to 6000m up to 6,000m
    Minimum range against low-flying targets:
    – at an altitude of 10m 1,500m 1,500m
    – at altitudes of more than 100m c.1,000m c.1,000m

    in reply to: A-400M: a good name anyone? #2517763
    Pit
    Participant

    A-400M “Pioneer”

    in reply to: New MiG-35 (in flight) photos #2520450
    Pit
    Participant

    What about a DIRCM (Directed Infrared Counter Measures) system?

    I remind to have seen some curious optical apertures on the wingtips of MiG-35…maybe a MAWS?

    Did we have any information if MiG-35 prototype is powered by RD-33MK or RD-33 Series-3?

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2067145
    Pit
    Participant

    I’m interested :p

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2522543
    Pit
    Participant

    Sapsan-E uses french Matis (Sagem) 3rd generation thermal imager.

    Seems like Platan is after all, similar in concept to Kaira.

    PiBu where are you :p 😮

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2525511
    Pit
    Participant

    Pyotr is Sapsan-E in production?…I have some confirmation of that, but would like to know your opinion.

    in reply to: are 29 and 27 have the best body lift among fighters? #2526135
    Pit
    Participant

    ?????

    Where is SOC…

    in reply to: MiG-25PDS and Su-15TM #2527653
    Pit
    Participant

    Matthias Rust was not spotted by the military. Those lied about that incident and had to leave office for that.

    So was Zuev lying in his book?.

    in reply to: Servicelife vs Performance #2532308
    Pit
    Participant

    Can someone post factual (estimated and real) figures of western (US, French, British mainly) aircraft and engine Service Life and MTBO figures?

    I have heard many times this issue but I’m more familiar with Soviet/Russian equipment, will like to have a handy reference for western kit!.

    P.S: Su-30MK2 service life is 3.000 hours, depot level overhaul is 1.500 hours. This could be extended as is the case with many pieces of soviet/russian kit (per example some of the old MiG-29 9.12A of the Polish Air Force with original service life of 2.500 hours are being strenghteen for 4.000 hours).

    Thanks

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 489 total)