E.M. Release Unit Type A, 11A/552, for Light Series Carriers. Maximum load on bomb hook 40 lbs. Loads such as 20 lb. H.E., 40 lb. G.P., 25 lb. Incendiary,, Smoke Float, Aluminium Sea Marker, etc.
Your guess of Swordfish, Lysander, etc is probably about right.
Most probably intended for a Miles Magister.
Speaking purely as an Aerobooter, I have to say visitor attendance seemed well down on previous years – on both days. The car park in the field adjacent to the aeroboot was nowhere near as full as I’ve seen it.
A pity since it was a pretty good ‘boot, with some interesting stuff on offer.
Thanks for posting these!
The Lancaster is probably a Canadian Mk. X on it’s way home.
I’ve seen that paint loss around the nose on other late production Canadian Lancasters.
They do look similar, I must admit.
Here are standard British built Anson rudder pedals for comparison…
They’re not Anson, unless the Canadian built ones differed drastically from those built in this country – which I think is unlikely.
I haven’t got all the details to hand but, yes, some of the Lancasters appeared in both films.
What struck me about the one used for most of the close-ups in APIL was the dreadful attempt to make it look “weary”. It looks as though it has been hosed all over with watered down distemper which has then been allowed to dry out, leaving streaks all over it.
Most peculiar!
The Lancaster’s used were NX673 NX679 NX782
Not to mention TW862 which appears in the opening sequence as the Wingco gets back from his 89th Op with a wounded rear gunner.
(Fortunately, though, he happens to have taken a U.S.A.A.F. Officer along with him and he takes over as rear gunner and shoots down the JU88 – yeah, really)
Not vastly different at the gun end, Mike. It’s the rest of the system that differs.
The pipe on this one appears to be plain rubber, whereas the pneumatic has braided protection.
My caption would be “Somewhere in England 1944” for the Halifax photo.
Surely it has what appears to be a standard Type E rear turret with four .303 Brownings? And it has Monica aerials fitted beneath the turret.
It’s a pity we cannot get a positive i.d. on the Mark of Halifax since it would help date the photo, but I’m assuming it is a Mk.III with Hercules engines, as the propellors look like the de H Hydromatic ones.
The Mk. IIIs were introduced around early March 1944, but Monica was stripped out of our aircraft in August 1944, after the famous “Woodbridge Ju88” trial when it was discovered just how far away that system could be tracked by German nightfighters equipped with Flensburg.
As there is snow on the ground, I assume the photo was taken during a winter. So, it might be a very early Mk. III, photographed in the snow in March (or maybe April?) 1944, before Monica was removed.
And the Squadron Code might also be KN, indicating an aircraft from 77 Squadron, which was based at Elvington at the time.
(Presses “Submit Message” button and sits back to wait for what seems like about twenty minutes before Keypublishing forum responds)
You can’t have enough reference material.
The rear sear picture comes from Air Publication 1641E, Volume I Aircraft Machine Guns Firing Control Mechanisms.
Re your other pics, well the first item looks like an oil filter, which would explain why it was soaked in oil(!) and the second item is some kind of Wireless part judging by it’s 10A Stores Reference ((Miscellaneous Radio (Wireless) Equipment)).
Someone with a copy of A.P.1086, Book 4 from the right era might be able to pin it down for you.
Here’s a pic of a standard rear sear release unit, common to most aeroplanes having .303 Brownings fired pneumatically.
One of your photos shows a Dunlop Part No. AHO5115 (if I’m reading it correctly).
It looks like a rear sear release unit from a Browning .303 gun.
Definitely not part of the oxygen system, but I suppose if the Blenheim had .303 Brownings, this would explain it’s presence at the wreck site?
The Air Ministry Stores Ref. series 5L usually covers filament lamps (bulbs). It doesn’t look right for this piece.
I agree with TT that cast numbers are usually maker’s refs, not Ministry ones.
For what it’s worth, none of the three panels look to be British. The layout is too neat (!) and the instruments are not the mix of large and smaller diameter ones which you would expect to find.
They are quite well filled with instruments so I would rule out pre-war types. My guess is postwar, possibly ‘1950s, and probably American.
Regards
682al