dark light

682al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 702 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sqadron 77 or 106 ? #1273006
    682al
    Participant

    77 Squadron used KN throughout the war. 106 Squadron used ZN throughout, so I think your database is wrong.

    I think 77 Sq. used ZL but only during the period of the Munich crisis. Perhaps this is where the confusion lies?

    in reply to: Bomber Command Tail Markings. #1273015
    682al
    Participant

    The standard fin markings on 3 Group aircraft equipped with Gee-H was two yellow bars painted horizontally above the fin flash, but not extending across the rudders. The usual method was for two non Gee-H equipped aircraft to formate on one with the equipment, and to release their bombs simultaneously.

    5 Group used coloured fins and rudders for daylight ops, mostly red, white or yellow, some solid, others with vertical, horizontal or diagonal bars in black.

    1 Group also had them for a while.

    (Edited to mention that the Halifax groups also had similar markings, lest HP57 complains!)

    in reply to: Tool Manufacturers… #1284216
    682al
    Participant

    or just what aircraft stores reference numbers refer to?

    Just that.

    My copy is 1949 and runs to 20 odd pages.

    Very useful for checking Stores Ref.s, and associated A.P. No.s, but not much else.

    RAFM, NA etc will have copies and some will no doubt pre- and post-date mine.

    in reply to: Tool Manufacturers… #1284977
    682al
    Participant

    My 1949 copy of A.P.1086, Book 1 confirms that 26BX is for Typhoon and Tempest spares (but I suspect you already knew that), and it doesn’t list anything against 26V.

    So probably not much use after all!

    in reply to: Latest News on "Dambusters" remake #1296449
    682al
    Participant
    in reply to: turret ? FN 120 ? wellington ? #1305031
    682al
    Participant

    The FN 120 was installed in some Wellingtons, including late Mk. Xs, but it was also in later Lancasters, too.

    Hope this helps?

    in reply to: Where on a Lancaster ? #1315362
    682al
    Participant

    It’s part of the sighting head from a Mk. XIV, XIVA, or T.1, 1A bomb sight.

    See the attached photo.

    It locks the head when not in use.

    It might be from a Lancaster, but could be from just about any other British bomber from 1943 onwards.

    682al
    Participant

    All I can see is the cover over the pitot tube (in it’s later position above the bomb bay) which appears to have a pole (broom handle?) attached to facilitate fitting and removal, and the fairing for the trailing aerial of the 1154/1155 wireless.

    in reply to: PA474's New Markings (Spoilers!) #1315580
    682al
    Participant

    What’s the point of painting it on the side of the airframe where no crew member can see it?

    Because a Lancaster the subject of a gas attack would most probably be parked safely on the ground, and unlikely to have it’s crew aboard?

    It was a common feature on No. 1 Group machines.

    in reply to: PA474's New Markings (Spoilers!) #1315766
    682al
    Participant

    beautiful…

    682al
    Participant

    Lovely photo, and thank goodness it’s been rescued from destruction!

    I don’t think it’s ND709, though.

    Assuming the bombs on the upper rows are painted twenty per row and they are aligned vertically with the starting point of those on the lower row (which seems to be the case), then they start from a position under the front turret, which is an unusual position for the bomb tally.

    ND709 had it’s bomb tally painted from bottom to top, i.e. the bottom row represented it’s earliest sorties, and extra rows were added above as it’s tally mounted. Norman Frank’s book contains a photo illustrating this quite clearly. And all of it’s bomb tally was behind the front turret as other photos prove.

    I reckon I’ve seen most published photos of Lancasters, and I cannot recall one with the bomb tally in this position*.

    (*Edited to say you can always be proved wrong – there are a few shots in Clarence Simonsen’s book on Canadian Nose Art. I’m not suggesting this is a R.C.A.F. Lanc though.)

    in reply to: PA474's New Markings (Spoilers!) #1315948
    682al
    Participant

    Yes, an excellent choice, one of my favourite examples of Lancaster nose art!

    A cloaked skeleton representing Death, dropping bombs from behind a cloudbank, with a crescent moon over it.

    Macabre, and quite non-p.c., too!

    Now, where will they get the 1943 style needle blade props, early pitot head, side windows, etc etc…?

    in reply to: Undercarriage indicator,Spitfire ? #1316569
    682al
    Participant

    …and the Walrus, of course.

    It’s a Supermarine thing.

    in reply to: Whitwick aerojumble #1334491
    682al
    Participant

    As many as half a dozen stalls selling books on a good day.

    in reply to: Whitwick aerojumble #1334659
    682al
    Participant

    22nd April I believe.

    Yes, and worth noting it’s back to saturday, not sunday!

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 702 total)