dark light

682al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 702 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cockpit Switch No. needed #1267098
    682al
    Participant

    I think you’ll find there are several versions of that switch.

    It would help to know whether the one you want is a two position, three position, or spring back type.

    in reply to: Boulton Paul Type D Gun Turrets #1267349
    682al
    Participant

    It’s those ugly flat panels on NX611’s cupola that makes it look different.

    My money is on a repair, due to the original double curved panels having been damaged at some stage. It may even be vandal damage since its arrival in the UK, perhaps when on display at Blackpool?

    Does anyone have photos of its turret when it first arrived back in this country?

    in reply to: How much should I bid for this eBay gem…? #1283230
    682al
    Participant

    Power o’ t’internet, maybe?

    Bidding has ended for this item. The seller ended this listing early because the item is no longer available for sale.

    ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: How much should I bid for this eBay gem…? #1283592
    682al
    Participant

    Surely the 20, 40 etc refers to the height of bomb release. These genuine controls connect directly to the range and height meters.

    Yep, that’s it!

    “Set the Graham Farish Spotlight controller to 60′ Pulford, I’m starting the bomb run!”

    Tomorrow’s Daily Mail:

    Last Great Dambusting Secret Revealed.

    How model railway controller helped smash Ruhr dams!

    I bet Peter Jackson’s got his cheque book out ready and waiting.

    Actually, I should stop Googling Graham Farish Locomotive – it makes me want to go out and buy one! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: RAF Air Publication to subject cross reference database #1290364
    682al
    Participant

    Just a small piece of advice from me, DORIS does not allow flash photography. Or at least, they didn’t when I last visited Hendon in March.

    in reply to: heads up BBC2 tonight Lancaster crash in Scotland #1295799
    682al
    Participant

    I found it all a bit confusing.

    For example, why, if the aircraft came “more or less straight down” (as the AAIB man suggested, and having lost its wingtips), was the wreckage so intact and apparently recovered from what looked like a small depth?

    Surely, wreckage in that kind of condition suggests a more horizontal impact, rather than a vertical one?

    Or did i just mis-interpret his comments? :confused:

    p.s. Would the FOI Act apply to Atcham Tower’s comment on accident reports?

    in reply to: End of Aerojumbles..? #1244933
    682al
    Participant

    And let’s not forget this small, but perfectly formed event:-

    http://www.aeroventure.org.uk/mainevent.php

    Described as a Military, Avionics and Radio Autojumble, but usually has a few straight out aerojumble stalls, plus books etc.

    A good day out with all the usual attractions of Aeroventure.

    See you on October 28th!

    682al
    Participant

    It’s not been a brilliant year for finds.

    A WW1 era magneto switch, obviously adapted for other purposes as it was liberally slobbered in emulsion paint, a WW1 era Elliotts Bank Indicator, as seen on the dashboard of your Microsoft Sopwith Camel etc, a n.o.s. Twinob magneto switch, still with Stores tag, much sought after by Tiger Moth restorers (and others), and a 9 gallon drinking water tank from a Lancaster.

    I also picked up a Pilot’s Handbook for the Martin Baltimore, sort of a cross between the Pilot’s Notes and a slimmed down Volume 1 Air Publication – fascinating stuff about an almost forgotten aeroplane which did much good service in the Middle East.

    As I scan this list, I realise with dismay that none of it came from the aerojumbles! ๐Ÿ™

    in reply to: Trolley Hydraulic Servicing Mk 5B & D #1245073
    682al
    Participant

    This is the relevant Chapter from the Data Book Of Ground Servicing Equipment.

    It tells you that you are seeking A.P.2306B for a more in-depth look at this trolley.

    Hope it’s of some help.

    in reply to: Lancaster tail section on Flickr… #1245182
    682al
    Participant

    That’s an interesting find slummer, and thanks for posting the link.

    I’ve been checking through Bomber Command Losses 1944 by W R Chorley, and cannot match up any loss in that part of France on 13th July.

    Les Gatines d’Oulins is to the West of Paris, but most of the action that night (12/13th July) was to do with the Revigny Raid, and most of our losses were to the South and East of Paris.

    Maybe the photo was taken on 13th July, but the aircraft had come down some time before?

    I note that ME668 of 106 Sqn is listed as coming down at Oulins, 3km N.E. of Anet, on July 7/8th. This is the same area as quoted for the photo on flickr. The target was the St. Leu D’Esserent flying bomb storage dump. 29 Lancasters and 2 Mosquitos lost – 14% of the force. And they wanted French ops to count as 1/3 of a normal operation!

    It’s definitely a Lancaster, but maybe not G-H equipped. There were a few experimental raids flown at around this time, but it may just be displaying the daylight recognition markings that were also used in the summer of 1944.

    in reply to: Dambusting Rapide! #1247752
    682al
    Participant

    Just checked the Airport’s own website and it rather confusingly displays a poster stating the Rapide flying is (was) 16th/17th September.

    I assume this is last year’s poster!

    http://www.sheffieldcityairport.com/#

    I’m interested, and might pop over if the weather’s ok.

    in reply to: Cleethorpes beach flights #1249267
    682al
    Participant

    Blimey, you’d a’ thought they’d have removed the Schrรคge Musik from that Fox Moth before using it for joy riding! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: Shoreham Aeromart #1252082
    682al
    Participant

    Hi Scuba flyer, the event isn’t happening. Search for Shoreham Aerojumble for more info.

    in reply to: Redhill Aerojumble Saturday 22nd September #1252678
    682al
    Participant

    Well here’s my take on it.

    A pleasant and relaxed affair, blessed with great weather. Nice vantage point, on the hill overlooking the aerodrome, so the flying could be viewed easily.

    Two smallish marquees for those wanting covered space, total floor area less than the one Dick Richardson uses for his Popham events.

    About a dozen more outside stalls.

    Books, books, more books, some flying clothing and general memorabilia, and just a bit of “hardware” (mostly on my stall), and books.

    Mutterings of too few “punters” by some stallholders, mutterings of too few stallholders by the organiser…the old vicious cycle again!

    But I thoroughly enjoyed it, had a rewarding day and will continue to support it in the future.

    Long live t’aerojumble!

    in reply to: Redhill Aerojumble Saturday 22nd September #1254593
    682al
    Participant

    Just a quick “bump” to remind everyone.

    I’m packed and ready to go, so see you tomorrow (I hope!).

    ๐Ÿ™‚

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 702 total)