dark light

682al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 702 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Where ould you like to see XH558 display first? #1388940
    682al
    Participant

    100% of the Vulcans operational sorties and it missed

    err, no it didn’t…

    in reply to: Spitfire XVI cockpit lighting #1389350
    682al
    Participant

    Ed,

    Like Mark 12, I cannot recall seeing a Spitfire cockpit equipped with ultra-violet lighting, but I would not rule it out as a mod on postwar aircraft. You would really need to consult the Spit XVI A.P. mod. volume at Hendon (assuming they have one).

    What I can say is that the Spiteful XIV had a full dual lighting system installed from the word go. That is, fluorescent instruments, lit by ultra-violet lamps, and cockpit lighting by Type C floodlamps (the little ones that sit under the coaming).

    regards!

    in reply to: Plymax panels used in aircraft #1396674
    682al
    Participant

    “11. Floors.-The flooring throughout the aircraft consists of Plymax sheet….The joints between Plymax sheets are covered with a metal strip to prevent splitting of the wood surface.”

    Taken from AP1719 E, Volume 1.

    It reads to me that the Plymax was laid wood uppermost, Cees. But, isn’t this something that the guys at Trenton could answer for you?

    in reply to: Revisionism in History ~ discuss #1406608
    682al
    Participant

    The night bombing did not hit any targets of significants, only by chance.

    The American effort achieved more succes

    Hi Schorsch,

    I am not going to get drawn into yet another debate about the effectiveness/morality/costs of the strategic air offensive, but when I read comments such as yours I have to wonder just how widely read on the subject you are?

    To state that night bombing (by which I assume you mean the R.A.F.) only hit significant targets “by chance” suggests to me that you really haven’t researched this subject much.

    And then to state that the American effort achieved more success suggests to me that you’ve been listening to an American talking about the war. Only not a very well informed American…

    Regards and end of debate from me.

    682al

    in reply to: CockpitFest Planning June 2006 #1412063
    682al
    Participant

    I agree with stuart gowans, in that I thought the 2005 event was markedly inferior to 2004, where there was a very good turn out (AND very high standards of workmanship on display.) The 2005 event seemed disjointed and lacklustre by comparison (not meaning to criticise the effort put in by those attending).

    I failed to spot the space issues referred to by TwinOtter23, and would have thought that any such problems could be avoided with a little extra thought – after all, the area around the new hangar is huge and more than sufficient for exhibits and stalls.

    But at the end of the day, the organisers have the right to set what rules they deem appropriate – and it’s for the exhibitor to decide whether he wants to fit in with them, or not.

    in reply to: AM stamped light unit #1412249
    682al
    Participant

    Interesting, the mooring light sat on a tripod but I don’t have any decent pictorial reference.

    in reply to: AM stamped light unit #1412403
    682al
    Participant

    Another possibility is that it is a Mooring Light from a flying boat.

    Any clues as to how the lamp unit is meant to be mounted?

    in reply to: Mystery Part I.D. please! #1412420
    682al
    Participant

    Are you gonna display anything at CockpitFest?

    Extremely unlikely. Offered to take the control columns to the 2004 event provided they could be displayed alongside our Aeroboot stall, to save on the burden of supervision etc.

    Was told that “The Committee” had decided that the Aeroboot should be seen as distinct from the Cockpitfest, so we would have had to man two seperate positions. Just too much hassle, so we decided not to bother.

    Could be from any aircraft really as they were generally a standard item

    Thanks Digby, but there is no Air Ministry Reference No. on the fusebox, which is why I suspect it is not a standard item “from any aircraft”.

    in reply to: Great British Design Quest: Vote Spitfire. #1413352
    682al
    Participant

    The commission was given to Supermarine Aviation Works, a racing seaplane manufacturer in Southampton, for a jet developed by its Staffordshire-born designer Reginald Mitchell (1895-1937).

    Hmmm, the BBC are putting a lot of effort into their research these days…

    in reply to: Gun Turret projects #1414041
    682al
    Participant

    Hi Peter,

    I just recall seeing it in the appropriate Volume of the A.P. for the FN 5 series and breathing a sigh of relief.

    That was down at RAFM Hendon. I will obtain a copy on my next visit.

    Regards

    682al

    in reply to: Gun Turret projects #1414052
    682al
    Participant

    Hi Peter,

    There was a mod on the FN5 Lancaster front turret to delete the seat and the seat adjusting mechanism. My excavated turret has had this mod performed on it.

    You may not need them after all!

    Regards

    682al

    in reply to: Lost TV RAF WWII drama #1417025
    682al
    Participant

    It was The Brylcreem Boys and I remember it well.

    The problem is, few people have any recollection of it. I have raised queries about it on this board and others, but no-one seems to have any information to offer.

    I seem to recall that David Threlfall (Shameless Channel 4) and Timothy Spall (Auf Wiedersehen, Pet) were amongst the cast.

    I wonder if a copy still exists? I have a vague memory of a screening being organised at the Imperial War Museum many years ago. Long after it was broadcast on telly, so maybe there is a copy buried in their archives? Maybe a good place to enquire?

    in reply to: Guess the Lanc……… #1420952
    682al
    Participant

    I’ll go with DV372 on the basis that the .303’s in the first pic are without their flash eliminators, and Papa Lima’s photo shows them to be missing on DV372.

    in reply to: Bomb Loading Diagram Metal Detecting Find #1424319
    682al
    Participant

    Hi Linz,

    Just bear in mind that Wellington is “odds on” solely because I said that the table in my possession came from one according to the bloke I bought it off.

    There has been no other proof offered yet, and I have already stated my own doubts, based on the reference to “top” and “bottom tier”, which does not seem to fit with the bomb bay of a Wellington or any other british bomber that I’m familiar with.

    Having looked at the bomb bays of preserved B24s, B17s, B25 etc, they all seem to have at least three bomb stations stacked one above the other, which seems to rule them out as well!

    So we are still left with a mystery item until someone comes up with more accurate information than any of us have been able to so far.

    in reply to: Another detecting find #1338906
    682al
    Participant

    It’s from an Oxygen Cylinder, Mk. VC, Stores Ref. 6D/483.

    Common to a great many aircraft, hence not necessarily from a Spitfire, the Mk. VC being purely co-incidental, of course.

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 702 total)