dark light

682al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 702 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Himmler and bomber crew executions #1414206
    682al
    Participant

    The Axis History Forum (not for the faint hearted) covers this topic every now and again.

    This thread seems to have a translated German document which may shed some light on the official position (it’s a long one though…)

    http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=14467

    in reply to: RAF Stations Ashbourne and Darley Moor #1414213
    682al
    Participant

    Can’t help with living contacts, but I assume you’ve already got a copy of Royal Air Force Ashbourne, by Malcolm L Giddings, published by Colerne Debden Publishing c. 1984?

    It covers Darley Dale too.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Offical Update #1414216
    682al
    Participant

    I’ve got many ‘558 display memories recorded on Hi-8 video tapes.

    One of my favourites is from Barton, which as many of you will know, is a fairly small grass airfield.

    I have always thought (no slight intended here) that on one horizontal pass, the display pilot somehow failed to realise just how tight his circuit was going to have to be, because I’ll swear as he went round the angle of bank kept increasing, as did the power.

    The resultant fly by in front of the crowd was so close that all I got on the camera screen was a roundel, some green camouflage, and a row of rivets! (well, perhaps just a slight exageration…)

    Besides setting off every car alarm on the field as usual, I remember it caused a small dog to bolt at what seemed like an ever increasing pace until it was out of sight, and I sometimes wonder if it’s owner ever caught up with it!

    The end of Vulcan flying was the end of my airshow days, nothing but nothing could compare with the sight and sound.

    So forum, let’s all look forward to the day when she takes to the air again and let’s cherish it while we can.

    I’ve answered the latest plea for more money and I’ll do it again if needs be. This opportunity is just too good to miss out on.

    in reply to: RCAFM Museum – Halifax NA337 Unveiled!(Update) #1414384
    682al
    Participant

    To celebrate this wonderful occasion, I must dig out two of my favourite bomber novels, Johnny Kinsman and Maximum Effort.

    Both written convincingly by authors who had “been there and done it”, and both written around Halifax crews rather than Lancaster ones.

    But I’m a bit confused and intrigued by this sentence, Cees:-

    I hope that over a periode of time people will not discover the shortcuts taken with this restoration and start slagging off the work in a similar fashion as YAM’s Hally

    Are you suggesting that shortcuts have been taken or (I hope) are you merely stating that the forum shouldn’t play host to unwarranted criticism of the restoration work?

    in reply to: Baginton (Coventry) Airport Period Photo #1414606
    682al
    Participant

    mmmm…a lake, and conveniently near to the aerodrome boundary.

    Has there been much scrapping at Baginton over the years? 😉

    in reply to: Help identifying recovered relic sought #1419303
    682al
    Participant

    Hi Nick,

    CONT NO 72-0700-63-0005

    Assuming from the above that this is a U.S. item and that 72 refers to the contract year, then maybe it hasn’t been in the water all that long?

    Just a thought,

    Al

    in reply to: Halifax Question #1424859
    682al
    Participant

    Just two more comments from me:

    Cees, congratulations on reaching 1,000 posts! There are few other such active forum members whose posts I always read.

    And Halibag-Phil, congrats on producing a stunning model! I can’t wait to see the finished product.

    in reply to: Halifax Question #1425079
    682al
    Participant

    Hi Cees,

    I still think the wheel looks to be the DF loop drive rather than the trailing aerial wheel.

    Look at the two together in this drawing, the loop drive being the upper one. (Perhaps they are still looking for the latter?)

    Whaddya think?

    Regards

    682al

    in reply to: Halifax Question #1427604
    682al
    Participant

    It looks like the remote control wheel for the D.F. loop.

    Whether it’s the correct wheel is a bit difficult to say because your photo is rather small and part of the wheel’s rim is obscured.

    It looks pretty much like the real thing, though.

    in reply to: Aircraft turrets (any) #1429873
    682al
    Participant

    Just a quick example of the “bum perches” used on various aircraft. This one is the navigators seat from a Blenheim IV.

    in reply to: Aircraft turrets (any) #1429943
    682al
    Participant

    Scramble Bill,

    Your cushion sounds a little small to be a knee pad, but maybe it’s a seat from a turret.

    That said, most seat cushions in Frazer Nash turrets are rectangular, but I seem to recall that Bristol turrets, from Blenheims etc, had circular seat cushions.

    I would expect there to be a leather/leatherette cover, though?

    JDK, yes, I’ve often pondered the value of placing a crew member in the astrodome as fire controller when under attack, given that most came from behind and beneath as you say.

    in reply to: Lincoln fire at Halton #1338181
    682al
    Participant

    Melvyn, how dumb am I for not having thought of it like that? Thanks for the lesson in reality…. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Lincoln fire at Halton #1338264
    682al
    Participant

    Search the British Pathe site and you will find a film of a Lincoln being consumed in a fire training exercise.

    The film clip’s reference is 281_01, but I have to say that this ref. appears to mean nothing to the site’s search engine, so you have to use keywords such as bomber/rescue/training, etc to find it.

    There’s an even sadder clip of two Lancasters being burnt for the same purpose.
    One appears to be a veteran which has actually crash landed – bent props etc, and the other is a brand new Mk. VII!

    I hope those firemen could sleep at night! 😮

    in reply to: Aircraft turrets (any) #1338467
    682al
    Participant

    What do you think is the best most innovative advancement in turret technology? Like Cees mentioned, the technology is very fascinating.

    For me, I think it’s more a case of the reverse argument.

    Fascinating yes, but the technology of British turrets in service didn’t advance much at all until almost the war’s end. It’s scandalous.

    The .50’s and better sights could have, and should have been installed years before they were.

    God alone knows how many bomber losses could have been avoided had our lads been able to shoot back on more equal terms.

    Here’s an example of how poor some designs were. The FN64 under defence turret from the Manchester and Lancaster (and also intended for the Stirling and Halifax at one time).

    The gunners field of view was restricted to a tiny area through his periscopic sight and he was supposed to rely on co-operation from the other gunners to tell him where the enemy aircraft was attacking from. It would be a near miracle if he could get a line on it.

    No wonder they stripped them out of the airframes to save weight!

    in reply to: Aircraft turrets (any) #1339508
    682al
    Participant

    I hope when I’ve cleared out some of the clutter from the workshop, and finished a few other tasks, I’ll be able to resume work on the FN 5 from a Lancaster.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 702 total)