dark light

682al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 702 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Under-rated Guitarists? #1947876
    682al
    Participant

    …Tab Benoit, Junior Watson, Hollywood Fats….

    in reply to: Advice on loans of Aircraft exhibits to Museums #1342708
    682al
    Participant

    I’d be wary, Fly.buy.

    I’d love to have the control column collection on public display, but I’m not sure it could be accomplished with adequate safeguards.

    I certainly wouldn’t loan anything irreplaceable unless I was absolutely convinced that all risks had been minimalised.

    Make sure the paperwork is bullet proof, and ask for confirmation of insurance on loaned items, not just their own stuff.

    As a small example of what can go wrong, my pal and I loaned our Shackleton panel to the Manchester Museum of Science and Industry many years ago. We reckoned it would display well under the nose of their complete Shackleton, particularly since access to cockpits is so difficult.

    Some months later, on a routine visit, we noticed several instruments were missing. It turned out that someone working on the Shack had decided our instruments would help complete it’s panel…

    No doubt it was just a lack of awareness/understanding/communication between a volunteer worker and the Museum’s management, but it taught us a lesson.

    in reply to: Foo Fighters #1345079
    682al
    Participant

    Is this phenomenon still seen today by pilots I wonder

    About ten years ago, I was covering office work for a colleague on holiday. I based myself in his office in Dukinfield (yes, XL391, that Dukinfield!) which had a good view of airliners arriving at Manchester.

    I paused to watch a Boeing 737 pass over the town, then noticed it appeared to have a very small, bright ball of light formating just a few feet out from it’s tail fin (port side, nearest to me). The ball followed in perfect formation for a while, then it suddenly performed a very odd sort of barrel roll around the aircraft’s rear fuselage and shot off in the opposite direction and out of my line of sight.

    I thought to myself “Oh, you don’t see that everyday” and got back to work.

    I told my colleague about what he’d missed, and being a bit of an aeroplane enthusiast himself, he must have decided to carry out some research. He later sent me a few pages photocopied from a book by Jenny Randles, describing several very similar events.

    That’s it folks. No Aliens, just what appeared to be a solid device formating very closely on an airliner and performing some very impressive manouevers.

    If someone comes along with a viable explanation, such as ball lightning, then I’ll buy it.

    in reply to: Hamburg Raid 5th of April 1945 – Wierd Lights? #1345189
    682al
    Participant

    Thanks for clarifying what a Wanganui is. Interesting codename, I wonder if there was a Kiwi connection in the invention of it.

    It was something to do with the home towns of PFF personel.

    Wanganui was one, Parramatta was another, Newhaven a third.

    in reply to: THANKS EBAY! FOR SCREWING THINGS UP! #1345200
    682al
    Participant

    Yes, but Aircraft Parts already existed as a sub-category anyway, within Everything Else>Aviation. There were also sub-categories for >Pilots Gear and >Other Aviation Items, so what’s happened to them?

    And besides >Transportation>Aeronautica, much aircraft/aviation related stuff turns up elsewhere.

    Have a wander thru Collectables>Militaria> and all it’s many, many sub-categories, and you’ll find loads of stuff, including aircraft parts which aren’t listed in >Aircraft Parts!

    The trouble is, if you’re just surfing for interesting items, rather than searching for a particular piece, it will take you all day to wade thru it all.

    Got to agree about Ebid, though, which is a shame, as Ebay needs some proper competition.

    in reply to: Hamburg Raid 5th of April 1945 – Wierd Lights? #1345211
    682al
    Participant

    Wanganui was a method of marking the target where the markers burst in the air rather than at ground level (e.g. if the target was obscured by cloud, etc.)

    Foo fighters were brightly lit “u.f.os” at night, or shining discs/balls in daytime, reported as flying in near formation with allied aircraft. They were regarded (by those witnessing them) as mysterious new enemy weapons, although I know of no reported attack by one. There are some quite interesting reports on-line somewhere from US night fighter crews (Beaufighters) about their encounters. I’ve also seen the odd account from Bomber Command crews.

    Trent and his fellow POWs might have seen some or all of the things mentioned so far, but wouldn’t it have depended to some extent on where he was on the night, i.e. proximity to the target area?

    You mention he was in prison, but presumably much nearer to Hamburg/Harburg than Sagan (S.E. of Berlin)?

    in reply to: Pics from 1952 – where to post? #1347339
    682al
    Participant

    Sure look like Wellingtons! I guess they would have been Mk XIX.

    I think you mean T10 Papa Lima, surely the only Mark left in service in 1952?

    in reply to: General Discussion #383774
    682al
    Participant

    Otis Rush

    All your love (I miss loving)

    How Blues gave rise to Rock…

    Eric Clapton? Overshadowed by a hundred other guitarists. Don’t get me started…

    in reply to: Under-rated Guitarists? #1948459
    682al
    Participant

    Otis Rush

    All your love (I miss loving)

    How Blues gave rise to Rock…

    Eric Clapton? Overshadowed by a hundred other guitarists. Don’t get me started…

    in reply to: Old photo – help appreciated #1350383
    682al
    Participant

    I’d say you’ve all done a pretty comprehensive job on this pic, and I really appreciate your efforts.

    A pretty rare type, in unusual circumstances too.

    Brilliant, thanks again!

    682al

    in reply to: Old photo – help appreciated #1352957
    682al
    Participant

    Wow! That’s going some, Anne!

    Hats off to anyone who can identify an aeroplane as obscure as the Panther with so little to go on.

    Was it the “hump” in the fuselage behind the cowling ring? I only spotted that clue after googling for the Panther.

    let’s hope there are more clues in the photo yet!

    in reply to: THANKS EBAY! FOR SCREWING THINGS UP! #1352962
    682al
    Participant

    I despair of eBay ever getting the aviation stuff into one, easy-to-access category.

    It’s a real ball-ache having to choose which category to put some of my stuff in and, because there are so many categories which might contain aeronautica, it would take a day to trawl thru it all as a bidder. The result is you stand to lose sales and purchases, in equal measure!

    It’s a crock of er……..and don’t get me started on paypal!

    in reply to: Old photo – help appreciated #1353210
    682al
    Participant

    Thanks for the answers, guys.

    Cees, my one and only Buzzard photo shows some similarity to this aircraft – single bay wings, squarish fuselage profile etc. This aircraft appears to have a civil reg, though?

    Ray Jade, yes there appears to be another machine behind it with what I take to be a rotary engine….

    in reply to: Hamburg Raid 5th of April 1945 – Wierd Lights? #1359323
    682al
    Participant

    Hamburg wasn’t bombed on April 5th, but Harburg (nearby) was.

    The target was the Rhenania oil plant, attacked by 327 aircraft and severely damaged according to Middlebrook and Everitt in the Bomber Command War Diaries.

    I would imagine that many of the “wierd” sights were caused by all that burning oil?

    in reply to: Lancaster Burnt At Le Bourget (2005 Zombie) #1364851
    682al
    Participant

    Thanks for posting the pic, Consul.

    It helps date this one I acquired many years ago. It was taken at an airshow at Le Bourget, if I recall correctly, and probably not too long before yours!

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 702 total)