Keep it in the public eye – I would be interested in hearing the arguments for and against (if there are any).
Still prefer “A Touch of Brimstone” though…
Well are you going to post the photo, or shall I?…..:diablo:
You are getting your favourite Dunlop numbers muddled, Graham.
4040 is the Spitfire Triple Brake Pressure Guage, 2040 is what is on your grip, as the picture shows quite clearly.
I agree with Tony’s views.
To me, the absence of the pins/posts on which the brake lever and parking catch are mounted is always a warning that you are looking at a Harvard grip which has merely had the screws which hold the stainless restraining plate removed.
Why would anyone go to the trouble of removing the pins? It’s not as straightforward as unscrewing them, the brake lever pin is also locked in position by a tiny pin which has to be removed – not easy to do.
By contrast, I bought a “proper” Hurricane grip off ebay which was also missing the brake lever and parking catch – however both pins are still in situ.
By proper, I mean it is still attached to the upper portion of the column, and bound to it by years of dirt and corrosion.
I’ll sell it to you for an obscene amount of money, if you like! How about £500 and your grip taken in p/x? 😀
I bought it as recovered in late 1941 from a Boulton Paul Defiant
More like recoverd in 1951 from an Avro Shackleton (and no doubt many other types). See attached piccy.
Any chance you’ll be able to get your money back? 🙁 😀
oooh goody, another “let’s discuss the visual differences in Lancs” thread!
If posart’s second shot with the yellow outlined code letter isn’t enough proof that it’s a 1944 or later photo, then this one, also said to be LM720, should do it. It’s been slightly enhanced by me to pick out the window dispenser chute, which was also introduced from mid 1944 onwards.
next! 😀
I understand that the terms of the design certification under the German approval body precludes the fitting of armaments or the means to install armaments.
Thanks AndyG,
A bit of the old Politische Korrektheit perhaps?
Seems odd to have gone to such lengths to create a beautiful replica but then not put any armament in it – or signs of armament such as gun ports, etc.
Or have I missed something?
682AL/ Rocketeer et al – Help!
You only have to ask…
http://www.warwickaero.co.uk/manualindex/ap1662a.html
o.k., so it’s a Mk. II, not a Mk. III but at least it’s a start!
What was Rotax is now Goodrich Power Systems, Pitstone Green (technically the Rotax actuation products became Goodrich Actuation Systems, Wolverhampton via Lucas ). If your looking for anything pre c1970 I understand they’ve binned their archive.
Many thanks Vega ECM, even though your message contains the words I was half expecting to see! Might be worth getting in touch anyway…
And in return for hijacking your thread Elliott, here’s the entry for E.G. Browne and Co. Ltd. Have you tried ringing Tottenham 2257 just in case? 🙂
I can’t help with the answer to your question Elliott, but it is an interesting subject.
I have a 1939 S.B.A.C. Handbook and Directory which is full of such companies, most now long gone.
In a similar vein, and without hi-jacking your thread, does anyone know exactly where Rotax ended up? I don’t mean the Canadian manufacturer (at least, I don’t think I do), I’m referring to the manufacturer of so much wartime electrical equipment. The Company’s archives would occupy me for many hours!
I just wanted to take this opportunity to point out again that there is NO Shoreham Aerojumble this March. Some listings decided to show it as happening on 24 March….which it isn’t! (That would not have been our date even if we HAD been running it!!!) So…dont have a wasted journey!
Just as well given the current spell of weather! The last thing I need is another overnight stay in a corner of a freezing Shoreham Airport…brrrr
We might need one or two rivets if you’ve got em!
There’s a good chance I can help out, but I need to know the types you want!
Well I’ve got the Volume I, but I doubt it would be much use. One of the slimmer tomes in my collection. I get the impression that whoever wrote it lost interest before finishing the job!
Can’t remember the thickness of the panel off-hand, but all the ones I’ve seen have been plywood.
It’s also worth mentioning that almost everyone has been modified to allow installation of extra/different guages, etc, so finding an original pattern example is quite difficult.