dark light

682al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 702 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Unusual Armaments??? #1273392
    682al
    Participant

    We’re always looking to expand the collection though!

    I must let you have the ex-wife’s address. I forgot all about the 250 lber. in the back garden when we split up. There can’t be many wives who’ve gained a bomb as part of their divorce settlement!

    I had loads of fun with that bomb. I used to turn up with it in the back of my old Renault 4. I’d lift the tailgate to proudly show it to friends, family and the like, but they didn’t know about the loudly ticking alarm clock hidden behind it! 😮

    Back on topic, wasn’t a Tiger Moth experimentally fitted with a scythe like blade hanging vertically below the fuselage, supposedly to enable it to cut down the invading Hun?

    And who dreamt up the idea of “Razzle”? Small packs of phosphorous, kept at bay by being water soaked in the aeroplane, but supposedly setting fire to forests and crops when dropped by Bomber Command over Germany.

    Desperate times, desperate measures!

    in reply to: General Discussion #323855
    682al
    Participant

    The factory just a short way down the road had just such a system “guarding” the employees car park.

    Once the local yoof cottoned on, all you could hear some nights was an amplified voice shouting:

    “Gerra way from my car you little b*****ds, p*** off home or I’ll come down after yer…”

    😀

    in reply to: Talking CCTV… Good or Bad #1935111
    682al
    Participant

    The factory just a short way down the road had just such a system “guarding” the employees car park.

    Once the local yoof cottoned on, all you could hear some nights was an amplified voice shouting:

    “Gerra way from my car you little b*****ds, p*** off home or I’ll come down after yer…”

    😀

    in reply to: an anyone help Id this stuff? #1282743
    682al
    Participant

    a landing type switch but has no A/M marking on it but the part number 5CW/2910

    A rotary switch, Type B. Probably post war.

    in reply to: WW2 Fighter Joystick – What is it? #1282748
    682al
    Participant

    Hi shawlein, and welcome to the forum.

    There has been lots of threads about spade grips, often mentioning Canadian ones. Try a search for more info.

    Your grip appears to be an AH2242 pattern. These were usually intended for Harvard training aircraft.

    in reply to: Original WW2 airfield signage #1283106
    682al
    Participant

    What a great idea for a thread. Here’s a few of mine, all picked up at aerojumbles:-

    CO’s Crew Only. No idea where this originated from sadly. Looks as though it’s intended to hang in a corridor, near stairs?

    Mirror from the Officer’s Mess of 101 Squadron. Looks to be 1920-1940s? Apologies for the poor quality of photo.

    Notice Board from R.A.F. Middleton St. George, with a couple of the girls alongside to give scale.

    I also had one of the Station signs from the gate at Binbrook, but passed this on to a Lightning freak. 😀

    in reply to: Short Stirling Mk III #1283735
    682al
    Participant

    Correct Cees, but it was bad grammar rather than forgetfulness on my part.

    What I should have typed was “As far as I’m aware, Stirlings used the FN 50, not the FN 150”.

    🙂

    in reply to: Short Stirling Mk III #1284082
    682al
    Participant

    Many Lancasters were fitted with Frazer Nash FN150 mid-upper turrets, as per the one in the photo. This was a slightly modified version of the FN 50. The upper structure was simplified and I presume it gave the gunner a slightly better view out.

    As far as I’m aware, Stirlings only used the FN 50 (Stirling experts feel free to correct me). It’s structure is virtually identical to that of the FN 5.

    Here’s an FN 50 with it’s lid off:-

    in reply to: Spitfire 400MPH or 480MPH ASI #1285108
    682al
    Participant

    We can always argue that this was taken in 1945

    Given that the Halifax depicted has fluorescent gauges (note the later style r.p.m.s), there’s a very high probability that it was photographed in 1945, or postwar.

    But aren’t we straying off the subject of 1939 480 m.p.h. ASIs?

    in reply to: Spitfire 400MPH or 480MPH ASI #1285256
    682al
    Participant

    No Graham,

    Coastal Command used them too, the better to co-ordinate with the Royal Navy, etc.

    in reply to: Spitfire 400MPH or 480MPH ASI #1285329
    682al
    Participant

    Olivier,

    We must have different Pilot’s Notes?

    My copy, for the ASR 1, clearly shows an ASI calibrated in m.p.h. The text quotes m.p.h. with corresponding knots shown in brackets.

    I have Provisional Notes for the GR 5. This does not have any photos, but the text refers to knots exclusively.

    So I think you have a situation where the bomber versions would have had ASIs in m.p.h., but those later adapted for use with Coastal Command would have had ASIs reading in knots (same happened to the Whitley, Hampden, Beaufighter, etc).

    My reason for mentioning the Warwick was to remind us that this aircraft was under development in the same time period as Graham’s 1939 ASI was manufactured. At this point, the aircraft was a heavy bomber. The prototype was flying in 1939.

    Hence, another candidate to explain Graham’s early dated 480 m.p.h. ASI.

    in reply to: Spitfire 400MPH or 480MPH ASI #1285705
    682al
    Participant

    For reasons best understood by Vickers-Armstrong and the Air Ministry, the Warwick also featured a 480 m.p.h. A.S.I.

    in reply to: Museums…what are your likes and dislikes #1285907
    682al
    Participant

    Arriving at the Yorkshire Air Museum at 3.10 p.m. on a blazing hot sunday in October, seeing earlier visitors strolling around in shorts and T-shirts, and being told:-

    “Sorry, we close at 4 p.m. in winter and we don’t like locking up in the dark.”

    Thanks Tom,

    Which contrasts nicely with an unplanned spur of the moment visit to the Mosquito Aircraft Museum a couple of years ago, to be told:

    “We’re not open to the public on mondays, and cannot offer you the full range of customer facilities, but if you’d like to wander around and perhaps make a small donation…”

    Was that you Bruce (or any other volunteers who frequent this board)? You’d disappeared out of sight by the time I’d ended my abbreviated tour but I wanted to thank you for showing courtesy and initiative.

    in reply to: Museums…what are your likes and dislikes #1285973
    682al
    Participant

    That good old British attitude towards customer care:-

    Arriving at the Yorkshire Air Museum at 3.10 p.m. on a blazing hot sunday in October, seeing earlier visitors strolling around in shorts and T-shirts, and being turned away, because:-

    “Sorry, we close at 4 p.m. in winter and we don’t like locking up in the dark.”

    Arriving at the Shuttleworth Trust at 2.05 p.m. on a bitterly cold snowy sunday in February, asking for two cups of coffee and being told:-

    “Sorry, refreshments finish at 2 p.m.”

    Yeah, I know, they’re all volunteers etc etc and “rules is rules”…

    in reply to: Short Stirling Mk III #1286622
    682al
    Participant

    This may help…

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 702 total)