dark light

voront

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Naval Aviation magazine #2056578
    voront
    Participant

    could somebody download this PDF and send it to me as i cant get the link to work

    http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/bac…/1979/jul79.pdf

    many thanks

    in reply to: To Iran with love!!! #1815384
    voront
    Participant

    not very long, the first thing to go will be the S-300. If your planning an attack you simply take out the dangers first. But does give Iran a advance in ADF

    is it replacing anything?

    in reply to: Any NEW's regarding the Japanese C-X and P-X ??? #2593252
    voront
    Participant

    there very nice design

    wonder how much they cost each, could be the transports and ASW planes some nations are needing

    in reply to: This is the Su-35 #2593309
    voront
    Participant

    i think he means buying Su-35, i think the Su-35 is a tad overkill but hey if that’s what they want

    i would of thought a Mig 29 (one of the newest upgrades) would of been much cheaper and the same level of capability minus the range and weapons load

    but thats my two cents

    in reply to: CHATHAM DOCKYARDS #2056664
    voront
    Participant

    I had the same feeling after visiting HMS Onyx. I am tll but not vet and i found that sub uncomfortable to small and no space at all,

    also all the bulkheads where small circles,

    in reply to: CHATHAM DOCKYARDS #2056700
    voront
    Participant

    Chatham dockyards always wanted to visit some great pictures, cool

    in reply to: The quest for a modern low-tech fighter #2595904
    voront
    Participant

    or a Mig-23 i remember seeing a upgrade, that whet along the lines of the IAF 21s, and was touted as being as cheap as a Mig 21-93 for the IAF, which would be cheap and give you a highly agile and fast fighter

    But i like the Mig 23

    in reply to: The quest for a modern low-tech fighter #2595960
    voront
    Participant

    a Yak 130 would suit a third world country, as a simple to operate fighter but what is the cost of operating them and there up keep?

    any idea on the cost of a Yak 130?

    in reply to: The Strike Beagle?! #2596044
    voront
    Participant

    now that i would like to have seen, would make a neat CAS,

    As a friend of mine said it may be old but i am sure you can use it, I wold really like to see the TU-16 badgers refitted to hold ALCM,

    cool joke though

    in reply to: Naval Aviation magazine #2056974
    voront
    Participant

    its not that, I tested on my PC both on firefox and IE and both said they where unable to connect to the server, cant explain it

    Most strange

    in reply to: Naval Aviation magazine #2056980
    voront
    Participant

    its really odd the pages wont open at all in my browser strange

    anybody else having this problem, In Safari or anything else?

    in reply to: blinders and fiddlers #2597787
    voront
    Participant

    Ah the good old Su-15 always liked that one, had a good Russian look to it nice find 🙂

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2597981
    voront
    Participant

    Thanks

    Not a bad weapons load but not fantastic either,

    thanks for the pic, 🙂

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2598009
    voront
    Participant

    That’s a rather nice looking fighter,

    wonder what its air to air performance is like,

    15 million for a fighter that would make it very attractive to some countries but what is it air to air load does any one know what that is?

    in reply to: k-19 the widow maker #2057727
    voront
    Participant

    lukeylad that sub is the RCN Onondaga which was a Royal Canadian Navy Submarine of the Ojibwa Class (Improved British Oberon Class or Super O’s) with its top sonar dome plated over. There one very near to where i live.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 48 total)