Yes indeed, but cancelling a project in the west to fund two projects in the east (EARL & Forth crossing) doesn’t sound like an ‘equal to all’ application of national funds…
Ok..throw in the M74 extension and even it all out a bit? :dev2: 😀
It is bit disappointing that the EARL official website sees no need to update such important news.
Talking it down? Not me. Simply being realistic. I am all for a rail link at EDI but politically it is going to take a back seat to the far more vital new Forth crossing.
Give the website time…
Will GARL politically also take a back seat to the new
Forth Crossing? :confused:
As for the other web sites..give them a chance to catch-up..
All capital project costs increase and no dout EARL will be no exception.. Shouldn’t we be wishing an aviation project
well instead of talking it down? 😉
As I understood it BAA were all for EARL as long as the Scottish Executive underwrote the risks associated with the tunnelling… :confused:
I doubt that has happened.. BAA wanted planning permission for their own private [Toll?] road from Gogar roundabout to the airport..Perhaps now it will be granted? 😮
Sign In
