There were lot of new on Plasma Stealth on PAK FA in the past. Is there any updates on it? Haven’t heard about it the recent days.

Only by logic..
There are plenty of room between the top of the intake tunnel and top of the wing surface.
Well, i guess you’ll see what you wanna see.
Nothing i can do about it..

Thanks

Adding to this….

Also they are better designers not to forget these stuffs or might already have found a better solution.

Short takeoffs? Hah. This plane beats all. :diablo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KF687gq958&feature=related

Eager to get it to put some AAM and LGB and kick some enemy bu***:diablo:

Fantasy (Had been waiting long 🙂 )

J7 — could have put a poll

But my choice–ofcourse

DRAKEN !!

Just one doubt how many paper planes are competing for MMRCA?, heard that IAF has requested for an AESA. Oh I don`’t care about LSPs/TD in that, only operational ones…..Need quite a big paper weight by some standard as per what written by a poster above. And I guess the biggest paper weight of all of them is Gripen NG because is it atleast an LSP right now? I donnntt know. Is it operational; ayyo rama no no,

🙁 Was slowly turning out to be a fan of Gripen, but got really pissed off by some horror writing on this thread. I go back to my poor old Mig 35 and not so selling Rafale.

How many of these paltforms are for offencise purpose? Is India here with some sort of reliability test for US as a supplier?

India has a habit of appeasing everyone and all these deals happening just before the MMRCA seems to indicate that its not a US fighter that is going to get selected. :diablo:

Ok, sorry. I thought a paperplane was just a project that was early in the development and had not yet reached the goal of being built into a functional prototype. I thought of paperplane like, “blue-prints”. I think several of your comrades on this site like quadbike and me thought it meant something else.

Do you mean to say that mk2 version would be way different from that of the mk1 version, would that mean the new upgrades make mk2 say a 10 or 30 or 50 times better than mk1 and that to achieve it the amount of devlopment required is too much, making mk2 right now a paper plane? Well then definitely it is going to be atleast twice better than Gripen NG :p (I would never have dared to claim so until seeing your last few posts:eek:. )

Or please provide info on upgrade path that the ADA/IAF has suggested from mk1 to mk2 to show that none of mk1s development work goes into mk2 and its just like the Irans ghost or paper plane or what ever you call. I can do this for myself, but I would prefer you to atleast attempt it rather than typing in those unthoughtful :dev2:.