dark light

Flyboy77

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 280 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2168290
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Piotr Unicornski at it again. 🙂 Lots of excellent nuggets of info;

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/269302992/AIR-PAKFA-Status-June-15?secret_password=3OBFokUfwt5F2RZoZWmG

    So i was correct on the stinger housing Himalaya related equipment, i was wrong on suspecting it was not a radar. It is a radar, but it does ECM tasks for Himalaya system.

    Why does that article use the Rafale purchases as a defence for “doubts from India” in regards to the FGFA? :confused: The MMRCA was also running parallel to the FGFA and had nothing to do with it. If anything, the small number purchased and news from India that no more will be brought plays into favour other aircraft projects that are under way from the Indian Air Force like the FGFA.

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2168748
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    …….

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2169615
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Always thought the SMT hump was too oversized, but it started to grow on me lately. There is something about its ungainliness that’s becoming cool (kinda like the MiG-21SMT). At least it doesn’t come with that oversized “unified” two-seater canopy of the MiG-29M2 and 35.

    No way. I’ll take the larger canopy over they hump back any day. At the very least it improves reward visibility and isn’t an eye sore at all. Definitely a better looker the a MiG-29UB and more functional.

    in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2170056
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Just with the MiG-35 and RVV-BD been integrated.

    I believe that the rumour started because of this bit of advertising that was shown at one of the MAKS airshows.

    http://www.missiles.ru/_foto/RVV-BD/IMG_0001.jpg

    I agree with most here that the RVV-BD doesn’t really suit the MiG-35’s role and wont do much good if they can’t get enough power out of the AESA radar.

    Then again, Russian love to integrate all types of weapons on their aircraft. Probably to increase their export potential and to be able to preform roles in extreme circumstances when other aircraft aren’t available. So I wouldn’t put it pass them.

    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Sheytan, any news on Iraq’s possible MiG-29 acquisition?

    Naturally the priorities have probably shifted given the situation in the country at the moment, but if the Egyptian MiG-29 deal goes through, might be a good time to follow up.

    There was a Iraq news article a few weeks ago that stated that Iraq was looking to get the MiG-35 and also the MiG-31. I’m a bit skeptical of it because it mentions the MiG-31 which I really don’t see any logical reason for but maybe it because of the positive service history the MiG-25 had in the IRAF.

    The MiG-35 has been mentioned a few times in the past so my guess it’ll happen at some point. We’ll probably wont hear about as Iraq MOD seem to have become quite secretive about arms deals with Russia.

    It they are really getting the MiG-35 and not the MiG-29M we’ll probably have to wait till after the RuAF MiG-35 deal goes through. Right now MiG is working on R&D for meeting Russian air force requirements for the aircraft.

    I’ve also been reading in a few other forums that the MiG-35 is till have trouble with its ASEA radar mainly because it leaks the power for the T/R Modules so it can’t get the max range of 200-250KM that they originally were hoping for.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2175521
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    RMAF to retain MiG-29N fighter aircraft

    Looks like another Fulcrum Operator is going to get the Ugly Hump back. Good to hear they are keeping them around.

    So what does this mean for the MRCA?

    in reply to: War in Yemen (2015) #2178590
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Well drop tanks and some AIM-9s at the very least

    in reply to: War in Yemen (2015) #2178747
    Flyboy77
    Participant
    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2179643
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Militaryphotos.net is down, any replacement to this one for Russian MPs?

    http://www.russiadefence.net/

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2180862
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    ooh what’s that? New ECM POD?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2208410
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Could just being used as a chase plane.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2209525
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    I think it’s just a matter of time before Russia ends sanctions on Iran. Really can’t see the Iranians going for anything else.

    Not Russian but UN sanctions that have stopping the sell of weapons. So until they are lifted you wont see any combat aircraft sales. Interesting to note that air defences are not cover by them so that why the news about russia going a head with the S-300 delivery after the nuclear framework agreement.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2210278
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    The first 30 would most likely be Zhuk-M as the designer mentioned recently , the later ones will come with new AESA and RD-33MKM

    Its a bit disappointing that it has taking so long to mature the ASEA on the MiG-35. It been in the works since 2007. I’m guessing it been a question of funding which they have now.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2210289
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    So with R&D being funded by the RuAF finally what requirements do you think they’ll have for the MiG-35?
    I’m guessing we’ll see an ASEA radar, the new targets Pod and possibly new weapons that are being developed for the PAK-FA integrated.
    Do you think they’ll be any airframe changes or will they stick with the 9.41 frame to keep costs low.

    Also speaking of MiG-35 looks like they are testing something new in the pods below the engine nacelles again. Any idea what these ones might be?

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to157000/156904.jpg

    in reply to: War in Yemen (2015) #2210574
    Flyboy77
    Participant

    Sana’s Airport looks intact despite the bombing and the runway was hardly damaged !.
    http://www.skynewsarabia.com/web/video/734245/

    Possible reasoning for it.

    http://spioenkop.blogspot.se/2015/03/is-saudi-led-coalition-sparing-yemeni.html

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 280 total)