dark light

kilcoo316

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 721 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: High-Speed Air Vehicles Designed for Rapid Global Reach #2598920
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Short answer? You can’t.

    Exactly.

    But I didn’t want to say it. 🙂

    in reply to: High-Speed Air Vehicles Designed for Rapid Global Reach #2598995
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    The questions is how easy will be, even for those hypothetical Laser air defences, to early detect and lock on an extremely Stealthy high speed bomber?

    And further more how many can have such air defence in near or even more distant future except US or maybe Rusia?

    🙂

    Another question is how easy will it be to make such a high speed bomber stealthy?

    You’ve got entirely different aerodynamic needs, thermal demands and ionisation problems to deal with that no current stealth design has had to solve.

    True, it would prob be a case of US and Russia tech only for a wee while, but then you cannot go over Russia, big limitation, try selling that to congress 🙂

    in reply to: High-Speed Air Vehicles Designed for Rapid Global Reach #2599006
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    The NKC-135 laser lab is not in service, it’s in the USAF Museum. The YAL-1 is still a prototype and not yet in service. What two in-service airborne lasers are yo ureferring to, since you can’t mean either of those? 😀

    Ok, so, I’m wrong on that, they are not currently on the fleet.

    How long would it take to get them out of the museum and into the fleet?

    How long would it take them to use the knowledge gained to produce a workeable laser? (I suppose they are already doing that with the ABL 747)

    Anyway, the real point is the research of laser weapons seems to be alot more mature (than hypersonics and sustainable hypersonic propulsion) and is producing prototypes of vehicles that could easily be transferred into service, whereas the X-43 etc are definitely pure test beds.

    in reply to: High-Speed Air Vehicles Designed for Rapid Global Reach #2599019
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Sorry to burst your bubble but we’ll see hypersonic aircraft and missiles LONG before widespread deployment of laser weaponry.

    Really?

    Considering the USAF has two in-service airborne lasers, and how many in service hypersonic aircraft?

    See more here

    and more here

    and yet more here

    I think my “bubble” is far from burst to be honest.

    in reply to: High-Speed Air Vehicles Designed for Rapid Global Reach #2599188
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    a new generation of strategic bombers?

    In a word, no.

    The development and poliferation of ground based laser defences will render such machines obselete before they are in service.

    in reply to: F-18 E/F performance report #2601136
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Huh?
    Lets see, the legacy Hornet carries about 10900lbs internally and the Super carries 14700 lbs. Strap-on one or two tanks and the Super still has more fuel.

    Oh yeah, we may want to place a couple of weapons on it, so the max TO for the legacy is about 56000 lbs and the Super is about 66000 lbs. While I’m sure that the pylon boo boo decreased the range I don’t think it is a 3800 lbs worth. 😀
    Disclaimer: fuel capacities were pulled off the net and/or mags.

    The super hornet is a much draggier aircraft though… transonic drag rises on it are horrendous, so an increase in fuel capacity will not correspond to a direct increase in range quite so easily.

    in reply to: F-18 E/F performance report #2601138
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Lets recap.

    The Superbug is still poor today because a GAO report 5 years old detailed a couple of marginal performance issues.

    Lets ignor those performance measures which met or exceeded expectations for starters. That would require us to actually read the report.

    Lets ignor the fact that the GAO never gives any aircraft it audits a passing grade and sometimes recomends a program be suspended until the technology is further developed or further studies are completed. The F-22 and F-35 come to mind.

    Lets ignor the fact that time has not stood still during the last 5 years. lets pretend that no further developments have been made to any of the systems that would enhance the effectiveness of F-18E/F – no sensor, airframe, weapons, powerplant or operational improvements at all.

    Lets ignor that the Bug is on the verge of a significant radar enhancement.

    Lets ignor the fact that the Superbug has been out there for years doing the job required of todays USN not yesterdays USN. It does what it was designed to do. Lets not pretend that the competition for the USN is proven in combat.
    Simulations are one thing, actually doing the job in a war is another.

    Lets ignor the fact that the Bug can run rings around the Tomcat in a dogfight and that the F-14 is limited to the same types of weapons as the F-18E/F for BVR. (if lowspeed prowess is irrelevant for the F-18 family it is for the Mig-29, the Eurofighter and Rafale as well).

    Lets not pretend that every fighter currently in service is not undergoing some degree of modification and development including those that are only beginning to arrive in significant numbers to be relevant.

    Sauron

    Ok, all well and good, updating sensors etc – but that could have been done on the F-14 as well.

    The SH is a crap airframe aerodynamically, nothing is going to change that – the fact it is not trounching the age old F-14 speaks volumes for its inadequacies. After all, does anyone give an F-15 a chance against its replacement, the F-22?

    The Tomcat is limited to the AIM 120 as all development on the AIM54 has ceased due to the Navy’s political agenda of getting the subpar hornet in the fleet – it levels the playing field somewhat removing the F-14s most potent advantage does it not?

    Lets pretend in 10-15 years time the USN has to go up against chinese MKKs etc.

    What would you want to have on your side to defend the fleet?

    An uprated F-14 with updated sensors, avionics and phoenix’s…

    or

    the subpar hornet?

    I know which one I’d rather have.

    in reply to: F-18 E/F performance report #2601150
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Comparing the AIM 54 and the AIM 120 is not fair.

    If the Navy had kept on the tomcats, or decided on an F-14E (further updates), sure as night follows day the AIM 54 would have been updated too.

    Compare it with the sparrow, not the AMRAAM.

    Now, could the subpar hornet carry a weapon of the size of the phoenix? No

    Could the tomcat? Yes

    A modestly loaded subpar hornet is barely supersonic for crying out loud!!

    in reply to: F-18 E/F performance report #2601590
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Is the Super-Hornet so bad ? imagine the slaughter against Iranians Tomcats… 🙁

    I can imagine the tomcats doing the slaughtering all right!

    in reply to: U.S. ban on Venezuela aircraft purchases. #2602774
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Did Apartheid-era South Africa have “every right to purchase modern fighter aircraft?” Back in the 1980s, the answer was “no.”

    Should a narco-terrorist supporting regime have access to weapons that might be passed on to terrorist groups such as FARC or the Shining Path?
    I applaud any individual who can make a stand against the proliferation of MANPADS. There are too many of these missile in the world, and too many have made their way into the wrong hands.

    .

    – So is Venezuela actively discriminating against its own citizens (especially the vunerable)? Strange for a socialist government 😉

    – “narco-terrorist supporting regime”, some evidence of this please (especially the terrorist bit).

    As for the MANPADS, its alright for us to have them, but not anyone else? Hardly fair.

    in reply to: U.S. ban on Venezuela aircraft purchases. #2602776
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Yeah but what I’m looking for is WHY they’re labeled as Latino when they are not descended from the Latium region of Italy or the Roman Empire.

    Actually, there are links there – Spanish and Italian are quite close languages, and from experience Italian buddies could chat up hot Spanish girls while I was clueless (they didn’t “know” Spanish, they were able to get by as its similar enough) 😮

    Latin (the language) was spread with the Roman Empire through Gaul (France) and Spain, so I guess thats the origin of the similarities. I also guess that is where the term Latino comes from :confused:

    Google is my friend: 🙂

    http://home.att.net/~Alsosa/page2.htm

    in reply to: U.S. ban on Venezuela aircraft purchases. #2602782
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Yeah but why are the Spanish considered Latin?

    Latino/Hispanic is their race. (I think thats where it comes from – truthfully, no-ones ever asked, Spain has always been considered Latino without question :confused: 🙂 )

    in reply to: U.S. ban on Venezuela aircraft purchases. #2602788
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    And off topic, but can anyone tell me why they’re referred to as “Latin” America?

    Mainly colonised by the Spanish – Spainish are Latin – hence the use of Portugese and Spainish language/dialect. Thus – Latin America.

    in reply to: U.S. ban on Venezuela aircraft purchases. #2603238
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    In a situation where a certain country some 3,000 kms to the north possess no less than 3,000 4th gen combat aircraft, expressing concerns about two dozens of Flankers and a handful of medium transports looks almost like a bad joke to me.. Well, maybe I am different.. 😎

    And to think some people say the USAF should be able to down 5-10 flankers for every aircraft lost 😀 :p

    I work that as a 1:125 kill ratio for the Flankers…. damn, maybe they aren’t as bad as some on here would like to make them out to be. :diablo: 😀

    in reply to: U.S. ban on Venezuela aircraft purchases. #2603258
    kilcoo316
    Participant

    Yes I stand on saying Mr. Chavez is arming himself to the teeth, those 12 transport planes are just a piece of an intended purchase spree that would include two dozen SU-27 flankers with their associated ordenance and support, several frigates, etc….

    So my question is: What exactly does he plan to do with that ? Launch a parade ?

    Any evidence to support this spending spree?

    He might parade with them, or use the transports for humaniterian purposes, or ferrying equipment to the oil pipes across columbia… loads of things.

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 721 total)