dark light

Kramer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 939 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2318973
    Kramer
    Participant

    Some beautiful pics of IAF’s upgraded An-32s in Kiev, Ukraine.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2325422
    Kramer
    Participant

    It is very popular among Indian Army aviators. My cousin flies Dhruvs in Jaisalmer’s hot desert clime and he absolutely loves it. He earlier flew Chetak (Alouette III) helis for the IA and the Dhruv is a huge improvement over it in almost every way.

    Grp Cpt Hari Nari’s posts (the current LCH test pilot) on BRF reflect the same opinion on how good the Dhruv is to fly, and he claims that the LCH is even better, even more stable and he predicted it will be one damn fine attack gunship.

    The Chilean evaluation actually went off very well, and they were most interested in the high altitude operations of the Dhruv, given that they operate in high Andean altitudes all the time. But politics and possibly HAL sales bungling meant that the Bell competitor was chosen despite being at least 10% costlier (at least that is what they advertise it as being- around 10-15% cheaper than any Western heli in that class). This after the Dhruv got the Chilean military flying certificate and flew over 100 hours over varied terrain during evaluations.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2325440
    Kramer
    Participant

    Some great pics of the Dhruv at Siachen

    Ajai Shukla’s blog- Dhruv proves world beater

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2356427
    Kramer
    Participant

    One very influential Brazilian Defense industry observer told me tonight that the Rafale has been all but excluded from the bid leaving the Gripen and SH to fight each other. N Jobim`s position at this moment is a very, very dire one before Dilma…. He also said that F-X2 is still alive but will need to be posponed some moinths waiting for the hard economic times to clear…

    Regards,

    Hammer

    Rafale all but excluded ?:eek: That cannot possibly be for technical reasons..has to be cost related only. I wonder how the Super Hornet is considered when Brazil has such high expectations from FX-2 for ToT. It will be a huge error if they choose the Super Hornet.

    If the Rafale is out, then the Gripen NG should win. At least for the bulk of the non-US sourced systems, ToT will not be an issue.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2013387
    Kramer
    Participant

    Thanks for that – having had my head stuck in the sand for the past however many years I never realised that the Gr9 didnt have a radar ,…………….. sorry for being sarky but really.

    The reason they should still look at the GR9 is that they need airframes. Tell me over the past 10 years when a Indian Harrier has actually been in action???? or likely to be before the Mig 29s are fully operational.

    Now tell me if you think retiring the Harriers in UK is a good idea, no its not you lose skills. So how about India buys 15-20 GR9’s forgets about the fact that they dont have radar and uses them to fill the deck. You take 4/6 Indian Harriers out and the same GR9’s leaving the rest on rotation. You keep your pilots qualified and working off decks as well as the crew. AND you get to use a plane that’s ground attack from a carrier….something the Mig 29 can also do, so you develop you doctrine for that?

    Is that such a silly idea?

    No its not a silly idea to have GR9s just for the attack role. Its just that the IN has mainly used the Sea Harriers till date in the fleet defence role. The IN pilots primarily train for that role. That is one of the reasons you don’t see the IN’s Sea Harrier carrying any sort of PGM whatsoever despite the LUSH upgrade because the main scope of that program was the addition of a BVR weapon and a modern radar.

    Whether the IN’s Shars have seen action or not is not important and is in fact a very silly argument. How many times have Typhoons seen any action over the time it has been in service? Does that mean that the RAF can do away with what it considers the Typhoon’s basic capabilities for the roles it assigns to the fleet?

    Nevertheless, the GR9 is a capable striker and it does bring some very interesting capabilities to the table. However, the only problem with acquiring Harriers now may be time it would take to buy these GR9s, then train some new Harrier crews to operate the GR9s (there are only a few of the Shar crews now, so it would require additional investment in Harrier trainers) would all take at the very least 3 years. There is no large pool of Harrier crews in India, unlike in Britain, so training new flight crew is going to take time. That will leave these with just about 5-7 years of actual useful operation on board carriers before INS Viraat retires, leaving them land bound.

    So, the only realistic option may be to buy up the remaining SHar FA2s, upgrade them to LUSH standard to keep on standard for the fleet, and aim to keep at least 10 total radar equipped Harriers on rotation onboard the Viraat. The rest can be used as spares hulks if required.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2356601
    Kramer
    Participant

    exactly ! nowhere does it say that the IAF has already chosen the ASRAAM, yet the guys writing the headlines cannot apparently figure that out. Either they don’t really read the content of the article or they’re just plain lazy.

    in reply to: Export orders J-20 vs PAK-FA??? #2357012
    Kramer
    Participant

    That’s completely irrelevant to after sales support. Besides, I have already explained that the PLAAF never allows China’s best to be exported and have given you examples where this has cost export contracts in the past.

    If the PLAAF allowed the J10B to be exported and started taking advanced orders for the J20 now, I’m pretty sure China could easily break into ‘rich’ non-traditional markets.

    Will the J-10B be exported to Pakistan any time soon? There have been many reports emanating from Pakistan that they intend to induct it as the FC-20 at some future date, but how soon do you think that will happen?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2357752
    Kramer
    Participant

    HAL Dhruv Marketing Video

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8p3jMi6yDA&feature=player_embedded

    Impressive that the Dhruv outperforms 3 of its competitors (Sikorsky S-76, Bell 412EP, Eurocopter AS365 with
    -better cabin volume
    -lower empty weight than all except AS365
    -higher MTOW than all the rest
    -far superior rate of climb than all the rest
    -higher speed than all the rest
    -higher service ceiling than all the rest with 5500 kg weight

    All this bodes very well for the LCH which is derived from the Dhruv.

    Somehow HAL doesn’t seem able to market it very well worldwide when compared to the Bell 412 and Sikorsky S-76 at least. It is 10-15% cheaper than them as well.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2357819
    Kramer
    Participant

    Hmm, if they did it would make re-equipping the MiG-27 with the Al-31 a more attractive option perhaps.

    Russia already displayed and flew a modified MiG-27 with the Al-31 engine. Somehow the IAF hasn’t shown interest in this engine upgrade, which indicates that they don’t see a long future for the MiG-27 in the fleet.

    http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/4870/2731dk7.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2357823
    Kramer
    Participant

    If there are safety issues with the Mig-27 you have to wonder if a new FCS would help reduce the issues.

    It seems to be a very volumous airframe and if HAL can make the airframe would not be such a bad aircraft if the engines and avionics were upgraded (i do not mean the radars etc but i mean the flight control system.).

    The safety issues are more related to the engine rather than the MiG-27’s pilot exceeding its flight envelope, so an FCS may not be particularly useful.

    But the aircraft is definitely one of the first that will be replaced after the Bison’s are replaced. Only 40 odd were upgraded by HAL with new avionics.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2358363
    Kramer
    Participant

    Am I right in thinking that Dassault currently has a reputation for quoting very high prices for after sales support? When I read about the update prices reported for India’s M2K’s, I am very surprised.

    Yes, and a reputation as being a very reliable supplier as well. As in, one who is unlikely to let sanctions based on its beliefs to come in the way of business. And that is an important aspect of doing business too, isn’t it ?

    That said, from all accounts it appears that the Typhoon has the edge over the Rafale as of now as far as rankings go and some report even mentioned that when Prime Minister MM Singh was told that the US fighters didn’t do so well in the rankings, he is believed to have said, very well let it go on. If politics doesn’t play too big a part (which is unlikely to happen) then the Euro-canards have the best chances of going to the next round of financial negotiations.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2013715
    Kramer
    Participant

    They really are gonna need to look at some GR9’s then. They better do it sharpish

    Those GR9s have no radar so would be ineffective in defending the carrier fleet from attacks, a role that the SHar currently performs. They need a fighter that has STOVL and a radar, so it would need an upgrade to get the Elta 2032 and Derby missiles.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2358750
    Kramer
    Participant

    Does J-17 have BVR capability today?

    Not yet, but the SD-10 will be integrated soon.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2358768
    Kramer
    Participant

    What this little aircraft has and not will be a discussion like in the case of any aircraft.

    For our benefit and a healthy discussion, would you be able to define based on the facts you have collected , on what are the shortcomings and what are the plus compared to other aircrafts in service with the IAF.

    Should also help accessing what effect news has on people and add to some good understanding on how this aircraft is seen from a different point of view.

    Ask him to compare it to what technological or other advantages his nation’s bought fighter, the JF-17 has over this so called “three-legged cheetah”. They’ll only talk about how it has entered service, and some say without even getting IOC. 😉

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2359499
    Kramer
    Participant

    Tu-95 Bears
    Tu-160 Blackjack

    so the next logical jet bomber from Russia should be

    Tu-xx Bigmac

    😀

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 939 total)