dark light

Kramer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 939 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2354597
    Kramer
    Participant

    This picture taken by Shiv Aroor at an IN mess, shows two MiG-29Ks flying over the INS Viraat which has a few SHars embarked on it.

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/TPddFKZJ6lI/AAAAAAAALwA/wBFg2hf3xrU/s1600/DSC00534_2-735329.JPG

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2354905
    Kramer
    Participant

    Would you like to bet on that ? Because R73 was tested as part of IOC requirements i doubt they would be testing another SRAAM when the testing is already behind schedule, its a matter of ticking off things, and the CCM is already ticked off.

    IMHO the IN version may get Python 5 at a later stage but the intial 20-40 IAF birds will have R73.

    And what do we bet on ? I don’t even know you so what happens if you lose ? I’m going to give more credence to what PS Subramanyam said rather than what some internet poster believes on his own account.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2355213
    Kramer
    Participant

    More details on the current series of flight tests of the Tejas Mk1 in Dabolim, Goa.

    link to Aviationweek article

    By Anantha Krishnan M.
    BENGALURU

    India’s Tejas Light Combat Aircraft is ready to undergo another round of crucial sea trials in Goa.

    Sources tell AVIATION WEEK that this time the testing will involve the firing of a missile and the jettisoning of a drop tank.
    The trials are set to take place this week at Naval Air Station Hansa, Dabolim, in Goa. Tejas successfully completed earlier sea trials in September as part of its Out of Station Flight Test Plan.

    Pilots from the Bengaluru-based National Flight Test Center will perform the weapon trials this time.

    “The density of air and humidity is very high in Goa. This time during the sea-level trials we are evaluating the radar, helmet-mounted systems and instrument landing systems,” a source said. “We will also test the radar warning receiver.”

    In addition to firing a Russian-made R-73 air-to-air missile, the pilots are scheduled to test the safe drop tank separation from the aircraft.

    “We have done all the ground-based tests. We are planning four-five drops at various speeds, altitudes and angles of attack,” a source said.
    “Tejas can carry 5,000 liters of fuel, including 1,200 each in drop tanks [and] 2,400 in wings and fuselage.”

    Tejas also can carry two outboard R-73 missiles and two mid-board beyond visual range (BVR) Derby missiles from Israel.

    “We have fired an R-73 missile in October 2007 against a zero target. It is important to see the safe separation of the missile,” the source said. Plume separation studies, which involve interaction with a missile’s exhaust, also will be carried out during the trials.

    Various Tejas platforms have performed 1,481 flights, clocking about 878 hr. Tejas also has achieved Mach 1.6 at 15 km. altitude and a calibrated air speed of 1,350 kph.

    Tejas is scheduled to complete its pre-initial operational clearance requirements by Dec. 27.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2355250
    Kramer
    Participant

    Because the report clearly states that the R 73 is the chosen SRAAM, it doesn’t say chosen for the test. So in all we will not see Python 5 in IAF service unless it comes with an MRCA variant.

    PS Subramanyam himself, no less, stated that a new CCM (Close Combat Missile) will be integrated with the Tejas Mk1 during the IOC period itself. Now we already know that the IN has chosen the Derby for the N-LCA (again from PS Subramanyam) so the likeliest CCM is going to be the Python-5.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2355253
    Kramer
    Participant

    From that AW&ST article-

    Program officials indicate that talks have begun with Sweden’s Saab on a technology consultancy and partnership, although the company refused to comment

    So they’re looking to talk to SAAB about technology consultancy and partnership for the AMCA ! Excellent decision IMO..I’ve been saying this a few times in the past too, that it would be wonderful for the project if an external risk sharing partner is included, to not only help overcome any particular technological challenges, but to also make timelines sacrosanct. Will also help in marketing this fighter to other nations.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2358034
    Kramer
    Participant

    Two very detailed videos on the various technologies and facilities developed within India for the Tejas program. They cover the breadth and depth of the infrastructure setup and the knowledge gained from this program.

    Youtube video 1

    Youtube video 2

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2358365
    Kramer
    Participant

    you’re right, it was the Su-30K that the No.24 Hawks painted in that special scheme..

    image link

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2359177
    Kramer
    Participant

    Thanks J-7 ! Where’d you get that pic from? That is the No.24 Squadron “Hunting Hawks” that was the first to get the Su-30MKIs and they painted one of their MKIs in that colour scheme with the ‘dharma chakra’ (the wheel seen in India’s flag) in the center, on the top of the fuselage.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2359218
    Kramer
    Participant

    For the same reason that existing test pilots have taken their own kits to NFTC. There is only 1 picture of a test pilot flying a Tejas with a DASH HMDS. The rest have all been using their own helmets, carried over from their last squadrons.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2359238
    Kramer
    Participant

    I dont think you can take your helmet home, or any other piece of kit.

    The Navy and DRDO/HAL/ADA are different organisations, i doubt they take their own equipment for the test flights

    haha..I know that pilots don’t take their helmets “home”..

    but when they’re depute to NFTC they carry their own kit back from their parent squadrons. the NFTC doesn’t itself provide any kits to the pilots since they are all on active duty and are simply deputed to NFTC, unlike HAL test pilots who are generally retired from the IAF.

    And what does “Navy/DRDO/HAL/ADA are different organisations mean” ? That is common sense and I never said that they were the same.

    MY point was that since Lt. Cdr Ankur Jain is an active duty IN pilot deputed to the NFTC presumably to assist Cdr Mavlankar for the upcoming N-LCA flights, he might have taken his kit while on deputation.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2359426
    Kramer
    Participant

    The IAF officer’s point that

    “there was a very committed effort toward envelope expansion, though we have fallen short in certain key specifications which we will continue to work on”

    seems to indicate that this is more a case of ADA and NFTC (National Flight Test Center) not having been able to complete all the test points in time.

    The article says that EADS’ help has been enlisted for expanding the test flight envelope to meet the services’ requirements..which again indicates that they have still not yet fully explored all the test points of the flight test regime which will finally reveal the full performance that they had initially agreed to with the IAF for IOC.

    LSP-6 was supposed to be the high-alpha platform and my guess is that since it hasn’t yet flown, they won’t be able to meet the Dec-27 deadline for the high-alpha aspect of its performance.

    I just hope that retd. Air Chief Marshal Krishnaswamy’s recommendation to first induct the fighter and then iron out the issues is taken seriously. If they keep delaying induction saying that its not upto the agreed specifications, it would be a very big mistake.

    And going by what the Air Force officer involved with the program said “it appears that the exercise of resolving certain performance parameters will spill over into the post-induction phase” it looks like a pragmatic approach has finally been adopted.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2359432
    Kramer
    Participant

    this report also talks about a full partner status being offered. What I cannot understand is why these news reports are taking it for granted that the Typhoon ended up in the first 2 of the evaluation..

    According to ‘The Sunday Times’, Fox’s meetings with Defence Minister AK Antony tomorrow and on Tuesday will mark another chapter in the intense lobbying of the Indian government for the 7.1 billion-pound contract.

    Fox’s visit, the first of a British defence secretary in six years, has been described as “pivotal” as the debate on the jet deal shifts from a technical to a more political phase.

    The Typhoon received a boost in the race for the biggest defence deal in India’s history after it was ranked in the top two of the Indian Air Force’s technical trials of all six bidding aircraft,
    which included America’s F-16 and F-18 and Sweden’s Gripen, the paper said.

    The report quoted Andrew Gallagher, chief executive of BAE Systems India, as saying that the deal being offered toIndia would bring New Delhi in as a full “fifth partner”, including the transfer of full technical sovereignty, access to computer source codes and the objective of making the entire aircraft in Indian factories.

    link

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2359466
    Kramer
    Participant

    yes and the DASH has been integrated with the Tejas Mk1’s cockpit. The question was whether this particular IN test pilot would come with his own Top-Owl F and use it plainly as a regular helmet.

    I’ve seen the rest of the test pilots each having their own different helmets, some with the Russian helmet used on the Su-30MKI (like when Grp Cpt George Thomas flies it), others with the Mirage-2000 type French helmets and some with the British helmet used by Jag pilots.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2359839
    Kramer
    Participant

    Is the pilot wearing the DASH or the Thales Top-Owl F in this pic? The reason I’m thinking Top-Owl is because the pilot is a Indian Navy pilot and probably has one specially fitted out for him. Elbit DASH maybe because they’ve integrated it with the Tejas Mk1 cockpit ?

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/TOgyLZRl09I/AAAAAAAALpo/ZqW76Tl5sEk/s1600/lsp5-1-712413.JPG

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2360963
    Kramer
    Participant

    This wasn’t the standard camo earlier. the different PVs have slightly different colour schemes with a couple of them having lighter ghost gray colour and the N-LCA twin seater (PV-5) has a slightly different one as well. But they now seem to have settled on this one for the IAF, since even PV-5 (the twin seater) had exactly the same scheme.

    Griffon39, those are dummy R-73s and the R-73 is the only missile to have been test fired from the Tejas as of now. The IN has asked for the Derby BVR missile to be integrated onto the N-LCA and the IAF will most likely get the Python-5 for its version. This was recently clarified by the LCA Programme Director, when he said that by the time it attains FOC in 2013, it will get a new Close combat missile, most likely implying the Python-5. Since the Spyder SAM (with Python/Derby missiles) is going to be delivered to the IA, the offsets required that Python-5 seekers be built in India as far as I can remember. May help in reducing the cost if more are ordered by the IAF also, in addition to the IA.

    Not sure which BVR missile the IAF version of the Tejas will get..maybe the R-77 or the Derby as well..and later on, the Astra.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 939 total)